Escala de autoimagem genital feminina (FGSIS): ponto de corte, confiabilidade e validação das propriedades de medida em mulheres brasileiras
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/e22015823enPalavras-chave:
Imagem Corporal, Sexualidade, Estudo de Validação, MulheresResumo
O objetivo deste estudo foi traduzir, criar um ponto de corte e avaliar as propriedades de medida da escala de autoimagem genital feminina (FGSIS – female genital self-image scale) em mulheres brasileiras. Validade de conteúdo, estrutural e de construto, consistência interna, confiabilidade teste-reteste e erros de medida foram avaliados neste estudo online. O ponto de corte do FGSIS para classificar a satisfação com a autoimagem genital foi realizado utilizando o modelo de crédito parcial. Participaram do estudo 614 mulheres (28,92±9,80 anos). O FGSIS apresentou estrutura unifatorial e propriedades de medidas adequadas. FGSIS≥22 pontos classifica as mulheres como satisfeitas com a autoimagem genital. Conclui-se que o FGSIS é uma medida simples, válida e confiável para avaliar a autoimagem genital em mulheres brasileiras.
Downloads
Referências
Berman L, Berman J, Miles M, Pollets D, Powell JA. Genital self-image as a component of sexual health: relationship between genital self-image, female sexual function, and quality of life measures. J Sex Marital Ther. 2003;29(Suppl 1):11-21. doi: 10.1080/713847124.
DeMaria AL, Hollub AV, Herbenick D. Using genital self-image, body image, and sexual behaviors to predict gynecological exam behaviors of college women. J Sex Med. 2011;8(9):2484-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02379.x.
Herbenick D, Schick V, Reece M, Sanders S, Dodge B, Fortenberry JD. The Female Genital Self-Image Scale (FGSIS): results from a nationally representative probability sample of women in the United States. J Sex Med. 2011;8(1):158-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02071.x.
Herbenick D, Reece M. Development and validation of the Female Genital Self-Image Scale. J Sex Med. 2010;7(5):1822-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01728.x.
Lordelo P, Brasil C, Lerche J, Gomes T, Martins P, Castro M. Relationship between female genital self-image and sexual function: cross-sectional study. Obstet Gynecol Int J. 2017;7(4):00253. doi: 10.15406/ogij.2017.07.00253.
International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. ISAPS international survey on aesthetic/cosmetic procedures performed in 2019. West Lebanon: ISAPS; 2020.
Ellibes Kaya A, Yassa M, Dogan O, Basbug A, Pulatoglu C, Caliskan E. The Female Genital Self-Image Scale (FGSIS): cross-cultural adaptation and validation of psychometric properties within a Turkish population. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(1):89-99. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3688-1.
Mohammed GFAE, Hassan H. Validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the female genital self-image scale. J Sex Med. 2014;11(5):1193-200. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12494.
Pakpour AH, Zeidi IM, Ziaeiha M, Burri A. Cross-cultural adaptation of the female genital self-image scale (FGSIS) in Iranian female college students. J Sex Res. 2014;51(6):646-53. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2013.821441.
Felix GAA, Nahas FX, Marcondes GB, Santos AG, Brito MJA, Ferreira LM. Brazilian Portuguese version of the Female Genital Self Image Scale (FGSIS) for women seeking abdominoplasty. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017;70(12):1786-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.07.007.
Arruda GT, Silva EV, Braz MM. Male Genital Self-Image Scale (MGSIS): cutoff point, cultural adaptation and validation of measurement properties in Brazilian men. J Sex Med. 2021;18(10):1759-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.07.016.
Mokkink LB, Prinsen CAC, Bouter LM, Vet HCW, Terwee CB. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health
Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument. Braz J Phys Ther. 2016;20(2):105-13. doi: 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0143.
Amorim H, Brasil C, Gomes T, Correia L, Martins P, Lordelo P. Relação do tipo e número de parto na função sexual e autoimagem genital feminina: um estudo observacional. Rev Pesqui Fisioter. 2015;5(1):49-56. doi: 10.17267/2238-2704rpf.v5i1.571.
Gagnier JJ, Lai J, Mokkink LB, Terwee CB. COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2021;30(8):2197-218. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02822-4.
De Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL. Measurement in medicine – a practical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, et al. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther. 2000;26(2):191-208. doi: 10.1080/009262300278597.
Wiegel M, Meston C, Rosen R. The female sexual function index (FSFI): cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores. J Sex Marital Ther. 2005;31(1):1-20. doi: 10.1080/00926230590475206.
Thiel RRC, Dambros M, Palma PCR, Thiel M, Riccetto CLZ, Ramos MF. Tradução para português, adaptação cultural e validação do Female Sexual Function Index. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2008;30(10):504-10. doi: 10.1590/S0100-72032008001000005.
Junqueira ACP, Laus MF, Almeida SS, Costa TMB, Todd J, Swami V. Translation and validation of a Brazilian Portuguese
version of the Body Appreciation Scale-2 in Brazilian adults. Body Image. 2019;31:160-70. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.10.002.
Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int J Med Educ. 2011;2:53-5. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
Cicchetti DV. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess. 1994;6(4):284-90. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284.
Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8(2):135-60. doi: 10.1177/096228029900800204.
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Routledge; 1988.
Masters GN. A rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika. 1982;47:149-74. doi: 10.1007/BF02296272.
Silva Gomes TB, Brasil CA, Barreto APP, Ferreira RS, Berghmans B, Lordelo P. Female genital image: is there a relationship with body image? Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;16(2):84-90. doi: 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2019.49799.
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios Contínua: Educação 2019. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2020.
Fitch MI, Beaudoin G, Johnson B. Challenges having conversations about sexuality in ambulatory settings: Part I —Patient perspectives. Can Oncol Nurs J. 2013;23(1):4-10. doi: 10.5737/1181912x231410.
Montejo AL. Sexuality and mental health: the need for mutual development and research. J Clin Med. 2019;8(11):1794. doi: 10.3390/jcm8111794.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 Guilherme Tavares de Arruda, Erisvan Vieira da Silva, Paula Somavilla, Maria Clara Rocha de Oliveira, Melissa Medeiros Braz
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
