Surface morphology and mechanical properties of conventional and selfadhesive resin cements after aqueous aging

Authors

  • Yahui Pan Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Department of Prosthodontics
  • Xiaodong Xu Northern Jiangsu People’s Hospital, Department of Stomatology
  • Fangfang Sun Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Department of Prosthodontics
  • Xiangfeng Meng Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Department of Prosthodontics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0449

Keywords:

Resin cement, Aging, Surface property, Sorption, Solubility, Hardness

Abstract

The stable long-term performance of resin cement under oral environmental conditions is a crucial factor to obtain a satisfactory success of the allceramic dental restoration. Objective: This study aimed at evaluating and comparing the surface morphology and mechanical property of conventional and self-adhesive resin cement after aqueous aging. Materials and Methods: Disc-shaped specimens of 3 conventional (C1: Multilink N, C2: Duolink, C3: Nexus 3) and 3 self-adhesive (S1: Multilink Speed, S2: Biscem, S3: Maxcem) types of resin cements were subjected to irradiation. After 24 h, the Knoop microhardness of each resin cement was evaluated. The specimens were immersed separately in distilled water and maintained at 37°C. A total of 5 specimens of each resin cement were collected at the following time intervals of immersion: 1, 6, 12 and 18 months. The samples were used to evaluate the Knoop parameters of microhardness, sorption and solubility. The surface morphology of the specimens after 18 months of immersion was observed by scanning electron microscopy. The sorption and solubility data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA. The Knoop microhardness was tested by the ANOVA repeated measures (P<0.05). Results: The sorption and solubility parameters of C1 and S1 exhibited significant fluctuations during the aqueous aging. The hardness of the S1 and S2 specimens decreased significantly after an 18-month water immersion. The S1, S2 and S3 specimens indicated higher filler exposure and stripping and apparent pores and cracks compared to specimens C1, C2 and C3, respectively. Conclusion: The surface of selfadhesive resin cements is more susceptible to aqueous damage than that of the conventional resin cements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2019-05-29

Issue

Section

Original Articles