Residual stress estimated by nanoindentation in pontics and abutments of veneered zirconia fixed dental prostheses

Authors

  • Vinicius Pavesi Fardin Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Departamento de Prótese e Periodontia, Bauru, São Paulo, Brasil. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6316-7359
  • Gerson Bonfante Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Departamento de Prótese e Periodontia, Bauru, São Paulo, Brasil. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8052-3036
  • Paulo G Coelho New York University College of Dentistry, Department of Biomaterials, New York, United States.
  • Edmara T. P. Bergamo Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Departamento de Prótese e Periodontia, Bauru, São Paulo, Brasil. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5006-2184
  • Dimorvan Bordin Universidade de Guarulhos (UNG) – UNIVERITAS, Guarulhos, São Paulo, Brasil. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8466-9558
  • Malvin N. Janal New York University College of Dentistry, Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, New York, United States.
  • Nick Tovar New York University College of Dentistry, Department of Biomaterials, New York, United States.
  • Lukasz Witek New York University College of Dentistry, Department of Biomaterials, New York, United States. http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1458-6527
  • Estevam A. Bonfante Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Departamento de Prótese e Periodontia, Bauru, São Paulo, Brasil. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6867-8350

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2021-0475%20

Keywords:

Fatigue, Ceramic, Fixed partial denture

Abstract

Glass ceramics’ fractures in zirconia fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) remains a clinical challenge since it has higher fracture rates than the gold standard, metal ceramic FDP. Nanoindentation has been shown a reliable tool to determine residual stress of ceramic systems, which can ultimately correlate to failure-proneness. Objectives: To assess residual tensile stress using nanoindentation in veneered three-unit zirconia FDPs at different surfaces of pontics and abutments. Methodology: Three composite resin replicas of the maxillary first premolar and crown-prepared abutment first molar were made to obtain three-unit FDPs. The FDPs were veneered with glass ceramic containing fluorapatite crystals and resin cemented on the replicas, embedded in epoxy resin, sectioned, and polished. Each specimen was subjected to nanoindentation in the following regions of interest: 1) Mesial premolar abutment (MPMa); 2) Distal premolar abutment (DPMa); 3) Buccal premolar abutment (BPMa); 4) Lingual premolar abutment (LPMa); 5) Mesial premolar pontic (MPMp); 6) Distal premolar pontic (DPMp); 7) Buccal premolar pontic (BPMp); 8) Lingual premolar pontic (LPMp); 9) Mesial molar abutment (MMa); 10) Distal molar abutment (DMa); 11) Buccal molar abutment (BMa); and 12) Lingual molar abutment (LMa). Data were assessed using Linear Mixed Model and Least Significant Difference (95%) tests. Results: Pontics had significantly higher hardness values than premolar (p=0.001) and molar (p=0.007) abutments, suggesting lower residual stress levels. Marginal ridges yielded higher hardness values for connectors (DPMa, MMa, MPMp and DPMp) than for outer proximal surfaces of abutments (MPMa and DMa). The mesial marginal ridge of the premolar abutment (MPMa) had the lowest hardness values, suggesting higher residual stress concentration. Conclusions: Residual stress in three-unit FDPs was lower in pontics than in abutments. The outer proximal surfaces of the abutments had the highest residual stress concentration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2022-05-16

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Residual stress estimated by nanoindentation in pontics and abutments of veneered zirconia fixed dental prostheses. (2022). Journal of Applied Oral Science, 30, e20210475. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2021-0475