Relative fracture toughness of differents dental ceramics

Authors

  • Clovis Pagani UNESP; Faculdade de Odontologia de São José dos Campos; Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora
  • Carolina Baptista Miranda UNESP; Faculdade de Odontologia de São José dos Campos; Curso de Pós-Graduação em Odontologia
  • Marco Cícero Bottino UNESP; Faculdade de Odontologia de São José dos Campos; Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572003000100012

Keywords:

Dental ceramics, Fracture toughness, Indentation method

Abstract

Although ceramics present high compressive strength, they are brittle materials due to their low tensile strength so they have lower capacity to absorb shocks. This study evaluated the fracture toughness of different ceramic systems, which refers to the ability of a friable material to absorb defformation energy. Three ceramic systems were investigated. Ten cylindrical samples (5,0mm x 3,0mm), were obtained from each ceramic material as follows: G1- 10 samples of Vitadur Alpha (Vita-Zahnfabrik); G2- 10 samples of IPS Empress2 (Ivoclar-Vivadent); G3- 10 samples of In-Ceram Alumina (Vita-Zahnfabrik). Fracture toughness values were collected upon indentation tests that were performed under a heavy load. A microhardness tester (Digital Microhardness Tester FM) utilized a 500gf load cell during 10seconds to perform four impressions on each sample. Statistically significant results were observed (ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests). In-Ceram Alumina presented the highest median toughness values (2,96N/m3/2), followed by Vitadur Alpha (2,08N/m3/2) and IPS Empress2 (1,05N/m3/2). It may be concluded that different ceramic systems present distinct fracture toughness values, thus In-Ceram is capable of absorbing superior stress when compared to Vitadur Alpha and IPS Empress2.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2003-03-01

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Relative fracture toughness of differents dental ceramics . (2003). Journal of Applied Oral Science, 11(1), 69-75. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572003000100012