Evaluation of the surface of root canal walls after utilization of endodontic rotary systems: SEM study

Authors

  • José Carlos Yamashita University of Sagrado Coração; Department of Endodontics
  • Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte University of Sagrado Coração; Department of Endodontics
  • Fernanda Araújo Valim University of Sagrado Coração; Department of Endodontics
  • Juliano Milanezi de Almeida University of Sagrado Coração; Department of Endodontics
  • Milton Carlos Kuga University of Sagrado Coração; Department of Endodontics
  • Sylvio de Campos Fraga University of Sagrado Coração; Department of Endodontics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572005000100016

Keywords:

Root canal preparation, Rotary instruments, Smear layer

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to determine, by scanning electron microscopy, the aspect of root canal walls after utilization of different rotary instrumentation systems for root canal preparation. Forty-two single-rooted and straight teeth were divided into six groups, whose root canals were prepared using the following rotary systems: groups 1 and 2 - Quantec; groups 3 and 4 - Pow-R; groups 5 and 6 - Profile. Irrigation was performed with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite solution in all groups, while only groups 2, 4 and 6 received a final flush with EDTA. Data were analyzed by non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis and Miller tests. Removal of the smear layer and other debris was more effective in the groups receiving EDTA as final irrigant. The Profile system showed the best cleaning, generating only a minimum smear layer, with a significant difference being observed compared to the Pow-R system (p<0.05), but no difference when compared with Quantec system. The final use of EDTA favored cleaner surfaces in all groups.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2005-03-01

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Evaluation of the surface of root canal walls after utilization of endodontic rotary systems: SEM study . (2005). Journal of Applied Oral Science, 13(1), 78-82. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572005000100016