SEM analysis of the acid-etched enamel patterns promoted by acidic monomers and phosphoric acids

Authors

  • Mirela Sanae Shinohara Campinas State University; Piracicaba School of Dentistry; Department of Restorative Dentistry
  • Marcelo Tavares de Oliveira Campinas State University; Piracicaba School of Dentistry; Department of Restorative Dentistry
  • Vinícius Di Hipólito Campinas State University; Piracicaba School of Dentistry; Department of Restorative Dentistry
  • Marcelo Giannini Campinas State University; Piracicaba School of Dentistry; Department of Restorative Dentistry
  • Mario Fernando de Goes Campinas State University; Piracicaba School of Dentistry; Department of Restorative Dentistry

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572006000600008

Keywords:

Dental acid etching, Dental enamel, Electron microscopy

Abstract

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: Although self-etching bonding systems (SES) are indicated to prepare dental enamel for bonding, concerns have been expressed regarding their effectiveness. The aim of this study was to analyze the etching pattern (EP) of nine SES in comparison with 35% and 34% phosphoric acid etchants (FA) on intact (IN) and ground (GR) enamel surface. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two human third molars were sectioned in mesial-distal and buccal-lingual directions, and four dental fragments were obtained from each tooth. Half of the fragments were ground using 600-grit SiC paper and the other half remained intact. The fragments were randomly assigned into 22 groups, according to the texture of enamel surface (IN and GR) and the technique to etch the enamel (34% FA, 35% FA, AdheSE primer; Brush & Bond; Clearfil Protect Bond primer; iBond; One-up Bond F; OptiBond Solo Plus primer; Tyrian SPE primer; Unifil Bond primer and Xeno III). Conditioners were applied to IN and GR enamel surfaces, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Specimens etched with phosphoric acids were washed with water, while the surfaces treated with SES were submitted to alternate rinsing with alcohol and acetone. The specimens were dried, sputter-coated and examined under a scanning electron microscope. RESULTS: For both IN and GR enamel surfaces, the EP of 34 and 35% FA was deeper and more homogeneous in comparison to EP of SES, except for Tyrian SPE. The acidic monomer action of self-etching systems was more effective on GR enamel. CONCLUSION: Most of the SES are less aggressive than phosphoric acid etchants and their etching effects were reduced on intact enamel surfaces.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2006-12-01

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

SEM analysis of the acid-etched enamel patterns promoted by acidic monomers and phosphoric acids . (2006). Journal of Applied Oral Science, 14(6), 427-435. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572006000600008