Evaluation of clinical periodontal conditions in smokers and non-smokers

Authors

  • Lucinara Ignez Tavares Luzzi São Paulo State University; Bauru School of Dentisty; Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontics
  • Sebastião Luiz Aguiar Greghi São Paulo State University; Bauru School of Dentisty; Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontics
  • Euloir Passanezi São Paulo State University; Bauru School of Dentisty; Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontics
  • Adriana Campos Passanezi Sant'ana São Paulo State University; Bauru School of Dentisty; Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontics
  • José Roberto Pereira Lauris São Paulo State University; Bauru School of Dentisty; Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Orthodontics and Public Health
  • Tânia Mary Cestari São Paulo State University; Bauru School of Dentisty; Department of Biological Sciences, Laboratory of Histology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572007000600011

Keywords:

Smoking, Periodontal disease, Periodontal parameters

Abstract

Given that tobacco smoking habit is a risk factor for periodontal diseases, the aim of this study was to compare clinical periodontal aspects between smokers and non-smokers. The clinical status were assessed in 55 patients, 29 smokers and 26 non-smokers, aged 30 to 50 years, with mean age of 40. The clinical parameters used were: probing depth (PD), plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession (GR) and gingival bleeding index (GBI) for arches (upper and lower ) and teeth (anterior and posterior). Tooth loss was also evaluated in both groups. Multiple regression analysis showed: tendency of greater probing depth and clinical attachment level means for smokers; greater amount of plaque in smokers in all regions; greater gingival index means for non-smokers with clinical significance (p<0.05) in all regions. Although, without statistical significance, the analysis showed greater gingival bleeding index means almost always for non-smokers; similar gingival recession means in both groups and tendency of upper tooth loss in smokers and lower tooth loss in non-smokers. The findings of this study showed that clinical periodontal parameters may be different in smokers when compared to non-smokers and that masking of some periodontal signs can be a result of nicotine's vasoconstrictor effect.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2007-12-01

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Evaluation of clinical periodontal conditions in smokers and non-smokers . (2007). Journal of Applied Oral Science, 15(6), 512-517. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572007000600011