Effect of temporary cements on the shear bond strength of luting cements

Authors

  • Marco Fiori-Júnior University of São Paulo; Ribeirão Preto Dental School
  • Wilson Matsumoto University of São Paulo; Ribeirão Preto Dental School; Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics
  • Raquel Assed Bezerra Silva University of São Paulo; Ribeirão Preto Dental School; Department of Pediatric Clinics, Preventive and Community Dentistry
  • Sizenando Toledo Porto-Neto São Paulo State University; Araraquara Dental School; Department of Operative Dentistry
  • Jaciara Miranda Gomes Silva University of São Paulo; Ribeirão Preto Dental School; Preventive and Community Dentistry; Department of Pediatric Clinics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000100007

Keywords:

Shear bond strength, Temporary cementation, Resin-based luting cements

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate, by shear bond strength (SBS) testing, the influence of different types of temporary cements on the final cementation using conventional and self-etching resin-based luting cements. Material and Methods: Forty human teeth divided in two halves were assigned to 8 groups (n=10): I and V (no temporary cementation); II and VI: Ca(OH)2-based cement; III and VII: zinc oxide (ZO)-based cement; IV and VIII: ZO-eugenol (ZOE)-based cement. Final cementation was done with RelyX ARC cement (groups I to IV) and RelyX Unicem cement (groups V to VIII). Data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey's test at 5% significance level. RESULTS: Means were (MPa): I - 3.80 (±1.481); II - 5.24 (±2.297); III - 6.98 (±1.885); IV - 6.54 (±1.459); V - 5.22 (±2.465); VI - 4.48 (±1.705); VII - 6.29 (±2.280); VIII - 2.47 (±2.076). Comparison of the groups that had the same temporary cementation (Groups II and VI; III and VII; IV and VIII) showed statistically significant difference (p<0.001) only between Groups IV and VIII, in which ZOE-based cements were used. The use of either Ca(OH)2-based (Groups II and VI) or ZO-based (Groups III and VII) cements showed no statistically significant difference (p>;0.05) for the different luting cements (RelyX TM ARC and RelyX TM Unicem). The groups that had no temporary cementation (Groups I and V) did not differ significantly from each other either (p>;0.05). CONCLUSION: When temporary cementation was done with ZO- or ZOE-based cements and final cementation was done with RelyX ARC, there was an increase in the SBS compared to the control. In the groups cemented with RelyX Unicem, however, the use of a ZOE-based temporary cement affected negatively the SBS of the luting agent used for final cementation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2010-02-01

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Effect of temporary cements on the shear bond strength of luting cements . (2010). Journal of Applied Oral Science, 18(1), 30-36. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000100007