Hybrid fixation in the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for lower jaw advancement

Authors

  • Felipe Ladeira Pereira Juiz de Fora General Hospital; Brazilian Army; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon
  • Marcos Janson Private Practice; Orthodontist
  • Eduardo Sant'Ana University of São Paulo; Bauru School of Dentistry; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000100015

Keywords:

Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy, Orthognathic surgery, Monocortical fixation, Bicortical fixation, Mandibular advancement, Condylar torque

Abstract

Miniplate and screw fixation has been widely used in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy, but some issues remain unclear concerning its lack of rigidity when compared to Spiessl's bicortical technique. This paper demonstrates the hybrid fixation technique in a case report. A 34-year-old female patient underwent a double jaw surgery with counter-clockwise rotation of the mandible fixed using the hybrid fixation technique. The patient evolved well in the postoperative period and is still under follow up after 14 months, reporting satisfaction with the results and no significant deviation from the treatment plan up to now. No damage to tooth roots was done, maxillomandibular range of motion was within normality and regression of the inferior alveolar nerve paresthesia was observed bilaterally. The hybrid mandibular fixation is clearly visible in the panoramic and cephalometric control radiographs. It seems that the hybrid fixation can sum the advantages of both monocortical and bicortical techniques in lower jaw advancement, increasing fixation stability without significant damage to the mandibular articulation and the inferior alveolar nerve. A statistical investigation seems necessary to prove its efficacy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2010-02-01

Issue

Section

Case Report

How to Cite

Hybrid fixation in the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for lower jaw advancement . (2010). Journal of Applied Oral Science, 18(1), 92-99. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000100015