Comparison among four commonly used demineralizing agents for root conditioning: a scanning electron microscopy

Authors

  • Nathalia Godoy do Amaral University of São Paulo; Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies
  • Maria Lúcia Rubo de Rezende University of São Paulo; Bauru School of Dentistry; Department of Prosthodontics
  • Fabiana Hirata University of São Paulo; Bauru School of Dentistry; Department of Prosthodontics
  • Marcus Gustavo Silva Rodrigues University of São Paulo; Bauru School of Dentistry; Department of Prosthodontics
  • Adriana Campos Passanezi Sant'Ana University of São Paulo; Bauru School of Dentistry; Department of Prosthodontics
  • Sebastião Luiz Aguiar Greghi University of São Paulo; Bauru School of Dentistry; Department of Prosthodontics
  • Euloir Passanezi University of São Paulo; Bauru School of Dentistry; Department of Prosthodontics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572011000500006

Keywords:

Demineralization, Root scaling, Smear layer, Scanning electron microscopy

Abstract

Dental roots that have been exposed to the oral cavity and periodontal pocket environment present superficial changes, which can prevent connective tissue reattachment. Demineralizing agents have been used as an adjunct to the periodontal treatment aiming at restoring the biocompatibility of roots. OBJECTIVE: This study compared four commonly used demineralizing agents for their capacity of removing smear layer and opening dentin tubules. METHODS: Fifty fragments of human dental roots previously exposed to periodontal disease were scaled and randomly divided into the following groups of treatment: 1) CA: demineralization with citric acid for 3 min; 2) TC-HCl: demineralization with tetracycline-HCl for 3 min; 3) EDTA: demineralization with EDTA for 3 min; 4) PA: demineralization with 37% phosphoric acid for 3 min; 5) Control: rubbing of saline solution for 3 min. Scanning electron microscopy was used to check for the presence of residual smear layer and for measuring the number and area of exposed dentin tubules. RESULTS: Smear layer was present in 100% of the specimens from the groups PA and control; in 80% from EDTA group; in 33.3% from TC-HCl group and 0% from CA group. The mean numbers of exposed dentin tubules in a standardized area were: TC-HCl=43.8±25.2; CA=39.3±37; PA=12.1±16.3; EDTA=4.4±7.5 and Control=2.3±5.7. The comparison showed significant differences between the following pairs of groups: TC-HCl and Control; TC-HCl and EDTA; CA and Control; and CA and EDTA. The mean percentages of area occupied by exposed dentin tubules were: CA=0.12±0.17%; TC-HCl=0.08±0.06%; PA=0.03±0.05%; EDTA=0.01±0.01% and Control=0±0%. The CA group differed significantly from the others except for the TC-HCl group. CONCLUSION: There was a decreasing ability for smear layer removal and dentin tubule widening as follows: AC>;TC-HCl>;PA>;EDTA. This information can be of value as an extra parameter for choosing one of them for root conditioning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2011-10-01

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Comparison among four commonly used demineralizing agents for root conditioning: a scanning electron microscopy . (2011). Journal of Applied Oral Science, 19(5), 469-475. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572011000500006