Academic performance and bullying in socially vulnerable students
Palavras-chave:Educational Status, Bullying, Vulnerable Populations.
Introduction: School bullying is characterized by over time repetitiveness of aggression, by the intentional injuring or causing suffering to another, and by the imbalance of power between the participants. This is not a new phenomenon, because the recurring situation of violence between peers at school has probably been a regular feature throughout human history. Involvement in school bullying can have negative consequences, including for the students´ teaching-learning process, in which those involved may have troubles such as failing, dropping out, as well as episodes of indiscipline. Objective: Identify the school performance of children and adolescents in a socially vulnerable situation, as well as to analyse the possible relationships of this performance with participation in the situations of violence that characterize school bullying. Method: 375 primary school children and adolescents of both genders aged between 8 and 16 years participated in the study. The instruments used were School Performance Test, Sociometric Scale and, Questionnaire for the Study of Violence Among Peers. The data were analysed using ANOVA Two-way test and Spearman correlation. Results: The present study indicates that children and adolescents in a socially vulnerable situation had results that were below expectations with respect to school development and performance in the three subtests – writing, arithmetic, and reading – in both genders and in different age groups. In an intra and extra analysis group, there was a significant difference between female children and adolescents in all subtests. However, the same was not observed among boys. There was also a relationship between poor school performance and participation in bullying situations, in which it was found that the score on the writing subtest was negatively correlated with practicing aggression and witnessing violence at school. A similar result occurred in relation to the reading subtest. The arithmetic subtest score, in turn, correlated negatively with the three forms of participation in situations of school violence: to assault, suffer abuse, and witnessing violence against colleagues. Finally, the total score obtained in SPT negatively and significantly correlated with practicing aggression and witnessing violence. Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, it was found that most children and adolescents in a socially vulnerable condition showed a lower school performance level than expected for their year attending. Allied to these results, it was found that teenage girls showed better performance than children of the same gender did. Moreover, there is a relationship between poor school performance and participation in bullying situations in different roles: victim, bully, and bystander.
Olweus D. School bullying: Development and some important challenges. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2013;9:751-80. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185516
Kärna A, Voeten M, Little TD, Poskiparta E, Kaljonen A, Salmivalli C. Going to Scale: A Nonrandomized Nationwide Trial of the KiVa Antibullying Program for Grades 1-9. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013;79(6):796-805. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0025740
Lopes Neto A. Bullying: comportamento agressivo entre estudantes. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2005;81(5 Suppl.):s164-72. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0021-75572005000700006
Fisher RM. Bullying escolar no Brasil: relatório final. São Paulo: CEATS/FIA; 2010.
Oliveira WA, Silva MAI, Mello FCM, Porto DL, Yoshinaga ACM, Malta DC. The causes of bullying: results from the National Survey of School Health (PeNSE). Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 2015;23(2):275-82 . DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-1169.0022.2552
Boarini ML. Indisciplina escolar: uma construção coletiva. Psicol Esc Educ. 2013;17(1):123-31.
Antunes DC, Zuin AAS. Do Bullying ao preconceito: os desafios da barbárie à educação. Psicol Soc. 2008;20(1):16-3.
Félix EMR, Alamillo RDR, Ruiz RO. Prevalencia y aspectos diferenciales relativos algénerodel fenómeno bullyingen países pobres. Psicothema. 2011;23(4):624-29.
Capellini SA, Tonelotto JMF, Ciasca SM. Medidas de desempenho escolar: avaliação formais e opinião dos professores. Estud Psicol. 2004;21(2):79-90. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-166X2004000200006
Yang KM, Chung H, Kim U. The effects of school violence on the psychological adjustment of Korean adolescents: A comparative analysis of bullies, victims, and bystanders. In: Yang KS, Hwang KK, Pedersen PB, Daibo I. Progress in Asian social psychology: conceptual and empirical contributions. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group; 2003; p.263-75.
Soares JF, Alves MTG. Desigualdades raciais no sistema brasileiro de educação básica. Educ Pesqui. 2003;29(1):147-65. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1517-97022003000100011
Stoco S, Almeida LC. Escolas municipais de Campinas e vulnerabilidade sociodemográfica: primeiras aproximações. Rev Bras Educ. 2011;16(48):663-94. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-24782011000300008
Marturano EM. A criança, o insucesso escolar precoce e a família: condições de resiliência e vulnerabilidade. In: Marturano EM, Loureiro SR, Zuardi AW. Estudos em saúde mental. Ribeirão Preto: Comissão de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Mental da FMRP/USP; 1997; p.130-49.
Stein LM. TDE: teste de desempenho escolar: manual para aplicação e interpretação. São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo; 1994.
Giacomoni CH, Athayde ML, Zanon C, Stein LM. Teste do Desempenho Escolar: evidências de validade do subteste de escrita. Psico-USF. 2015;20(1):133-40.
Freire IP, Simão AMV, Ferreira AS. O estudo da violência entre pares no 3º ciclo do ensino básico: um questionário aferido para a população escolar portuguesa. Rev Port Educ. 2006;19(2):157-83.
Capellini S, Tonelotto J, Ciasca S. Medidas de desempenho escolar: avaliação formais e opinião dos professores. Estud Psicol. 2004;21(2):79-90. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-166X2004000200006
Ferreira AA, Conte KM, Marturano EM. Meninos com queixa escolar: autopercepções, desempenho e comportamento. Estud Psicol. 2011;28(4):443-51. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-166X2011000400005
Silva JD, Beltrame TS, Oliveira AVP, Sperandio FF. Motor and learning disabilities in school children with low academic performance. Rev Bras crescimento Desenvolv Hum. 2012;22(1):41-46 . DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.20048
Coley RL, Morris JE, Hernandez D. Out-of-school care and problem behavior trajectories among low-income adolescents: individual, family, and neighborhood characteristics as added risks. Child Dev. 2004;75(3):948-65. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00716.x
Rota Júnior, C. Educação e mobilidade social: estudo sobre a legislação educacional brasileira. Educ Soc Cult. 2013;(38):169-84.
Gardner JM, Powell CA, Grantham-McGregor SM. Determinants of aggression and pro social behavior among Jamaican school boys. West Indian Med J. 2007;56(1):34-41.
Kohut MR. The Complete guide to understanding, controlling, and stopping bullies & Bullying: a completeguide for teachers & parents. Ocala: Atlantic; 2007.
Mrug S, Windle M. Bidirectional influences of violence exposure and adjustment in early adolescence: externalizing behaviors and school connectedness. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2009;37(5):611-23. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10802-009-9304-6
Brooke N. O futuro das políticas de responsabilização educacional no Brasil. Cad Pesqui. 2006;36(128):377-401. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-15742006000200006
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis