O conceito de coparentalidade e suas implicações para a pesquisa e para a clínica: implication for research and clinical practice

Autores

  • Giana Bitencourt Frizzo Universidade Federal do Rrio Grande do Sul; Instituto de Psicologia; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia
  • Carla Meira Kreutz Universidade Federal do Rrio Grande do Sul
  • Carlo Schmidt Universidade Federal do Rrio Grande do Sul
  • Cesar Augusto Piccinini CNPq
  • Cleonice Bosa University of London; Institute of Psychiatry

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.19774

Palavras-chave:

Coparentalidade, Sistema familiar, Relacionamento conjugal

Resumo

Este estudo tem por objetivo revisar o conceito de coparentalidade e suas implicações para a pesquisa e para a clínica. Para isso, examinou-se a origem e a evolução do conceito e sua relevância para o contexto atual. O uso deste conceito nas pesquisas tem sido ampliado, passando de uma ênfase nas díades mãe-criança para uma concepção que envolve a tríade mãe-pai-criança. Esta evolução no conceito de coparentalidade tem implicações para a clínica, tanto com famílias de pais casados como divorciados. Verificou-se também uma carência de instrumentos nessa área, cuja elaboração merece ser enfocada em futuros estudos.

Referências

McHale JP. Co-parenting and triadic interactions during infancy: the roles of marital distress andchild gender. Developmental Psychology. 1995;31(6): 985-96.

Feinberg M. The internal structure and ecological context of co-parenting: A framework for rese-arch and intervention. Parenting: Science and Practice 2003;3: 95-131.

Margolin G, Godis EB, John RS. Coparenting: a link between marital conflict and parenting in two-parent families. Journal of Family Psychology2001; 15(1), 3-21.

Galper M. Coparenting: sharing your child equally. A source book for the separated or divorced family. ERIC 1978. Available from: http://ca1.csa.com.w20048.dotlib.com.br/ids70/view_record.php?id.

Koch MA, Lowery CR. Visitation and the non-custodial father. Journal of Divorce 1984;2: 47-65.

Ahrons GR. The continuing coparental relationship between divorced spouses. Am J Orthopychiatry. 1981;51(30:415-28.

Schoppe S ,Mangelsdorf SC, Frosch CA. Copa-renting, family process and family structure: implications for preschoolers’ externalizing behavi-or problems. Journal of Family Psychology. 2001;15(3): 526-45.

Belsky J, Crnic K, Gable S. The determinants of co-parenting in families with toddler boys: spousal differences and daily hassles. Child Development. 1995; 66: 629-42.

Coiro MJ, Emery RE. Do marriage problems affect fathering more than mothering? A quantitative and qualitative review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review 1998; 1: 23-40.

Minuchin S. Famílias: funcionamento e tratamento. (JA Cunha, Trad.). Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas; 1982. (Original publicado em 1974).

Minuchin S, Fishman HC. Famílias. em: técnicas de terapia familiar. (Kinsch e Maia, Trad.). (pp.21-36). Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas; 1990.

Walsh F. Casais saudáveis e casais disfuncionais: qual a diferença?. In: Andolfi M. (organizador). A crise do casal uma perspectiva sistêmico relacional (L. Kahl & G, Menegoz, Trad.). (pp.13-28).Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2002.

McHale JP. (1997). Overt and covert coparenting processes in the family. Family Process 1997; 36:183-201.

Barnes HL, Olson DH. Parent-adolescent communication and the circumplex model. Child Development 1985; 55: 438-47.

Andolfi M. O triângulo como unidade mínima de observação. A linguagem do encontro terapêutico. (pp.30-47). Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas; 1996.

Minuchin P. Families and individual development: provocations from the field of family therapy. Child Development. 1985; 56: 289-302.

Gable S, Belsky J, Crnic K. Marriage, parent-ing and child development: Progress and prospects. J Family Psychology. 1992; 5: 276-94.

McHale JP, Kuersten-Hogan R, Lauretti A, Rasmussen JL. Parental reports of coparenting and observed coparenting behavior during the toddler period. Journal of Family Psychology 2000;14:220-36.

Belsky J, Hsieh K. Patterns of marital change during the early childhood years: parent personality, coparenting and division of labor correlates. Jour-nal of Family Psychology, 1998;12: 511-28.

Vaughn AB. The dynamics of coparenting in family interactions. Dissertation Abstracts International-Section B-The Sciences and Engineering. 2000; 60: 3599.

Retting KD, Leichtentritt RD, Staton LM. Under-standing noncustodial fathers’s family and life satisfaction from resource theory perspective. J Family Issues 1999;20: 507-38.

Madden-Derdich DA, Leonard AS, Christopher FS. Boundary ambiguity and coparental conflict after divorce: An empirical test of a family systems model of the divorce preocess. J Marriage and the Family. 1999;61:588-98.

McHale JP, Johnson D, Sinclair R Family dynamics, preschoolers’ family representativeness and preschool peer relationships. Early Education and Development 1999;1:, 373-401.

Van-Egeren LA. Pre-birth predictors of coparen-ting experiences in early infancy. Infant Mental Health Journal 2000;24: 278-95.

Kitzmann KM. Effects of marital conflict on sub-sequent triadic family interactions and parenting. Developmental Psychology. 2000;36:3-13.

Downloads

Publicado

2005-12-01

Edição

v. 15 n. 3 (2005)

Seção

Atualização

Licença

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis