Carências afetivas dos negros marron (Guiana Francesa): da maternagem tradicional à maternagem de “bricolagem”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.40002Palavras-chave:
Eu-Pele. Carências afetivas. Negros marron. Maternagem.Resumo
A presente pesquisa se apoia em trabalhos anteriores referentes a relatórios médicos e psicológicos sobre a subnutrição e sobre a carência das crianças no vale do Maroni, Surimam. Estuda-se os comportamentos de maternagem das mães Bushi-Nenghe. Submetidas a novas condições sócio-econômicas e políticas, novas práticas de maternagem aparecem nas mães, que tendem a combinar, sob essa influência, práticas modernas e práticas tradicionais. Em decorrência, produz-se um distanciamento corporal e afetivo no apego que leva, em parte, a um questionamento do papel do “eu-pele”, constitutivo do Eu.Referências
Delpech B. Les Aluku de Guyane à untournant: de l’économie de subsistance à lasociété de consommation. Les Cahiers d’OutreMer 1993; (182): 175-93.
Winnicott W. De la pédiatrie à la psychanalyse. Paris: Payot; 1969.
Ainsworth MDS. Object relations, dependency and attachment: a theorical review of the in fant mother relationship. Child Development. 1969;(40): 969-1025.
Anzieu D. Le moi peau. Paris: Dunod; 1985.
Hurault J, Orru JF. Quarante ans de modernitéchez les Aluku de Guyane. In: Grenand P. Lespeuples des forêts tropicales aujourd’hui. Bruxelles: APFT; 2002.
Levi-Strauss C. Les structures élémentaires dela parenté. New York: Mouton de Gruyter; 2000.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis
