Crescimento humano: parâmetros e reflexões acerca de referenciais

Autores

  • Claudio Leone Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.76138

Palavras-chave:

Crescimento humano, parâmetros, reflexões, referenciais

Resumo

Não se aplica

Biografia do Autor

  • Claudio Leone, Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
    Médico, Pediatra, Doutor e Livre Docente em Pediatria Social. Professor Titular do Departamento de Saúde Materno-Infantil da Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo.

Referências

Perera PJ, Fernanado MP, Ranathunga N, Sampath W, Samaranayake R, Meththananda S. Growth parameters of Sri Lankan children during infancy: A comparison with world health organization multicentre growth reference study. Journal of Human Growth and Development 2014; 24(1): 11-15.

World Health Organization Multicenter Study Group. WHO Child Growth Standards based on length/height, weight and age. Acta Paediatr Suppl 2006; 450:76-85.

Cole, TJ. Growth References and Standards. In: Cameron, N. Editor, Human Growth and Development. Academic Press, London, 2006.

Eveleth P.B., Population Differences in Growth, Environmental and Genetic Factors. In: Falkner F and Tanner JM, Editors, Human Growth, A comprehensive Treatise. 2nd Edition, Plenum Press, New York, 1986.

Marcondes E. Fatores ambientais do crescimento da criança. Revista brasileira de crescimento e desenvolvimento humano 1991, 1(1):11-24.

Popkin BM. The nutrition transition and its health implications in lower- ncome countries.Public Health Nutr 1988;1:5-22.

Ong KKL, Ahmed ML, Emmett PM, Preece MA. Association between postnatal catch-up growth and obesity in childhood: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2000; 320:967-971.

Wells JCK. The programming effects of early growth. Early Human Development 2007; 83(12):743-748.

Bielicki T. Secular trends in growth: human biologists’ contribution to the understanding of social change. In: Johnston FE, Zemel B and Eveleth PB, Editors. Human Growth in Context. Smith-Gordon and Company, London, 1999.

Takahashi E. Secular Trend in Milk Consumption and Growth in Japan. HumanBiology 1984; 56(3): 427-437.

Martorell R, Khan LK, Hughes ML and Grummer-Strawn LM. Overweight and obesity in preschool children from developing countries. International Journal of Obesity 2000, 24: 959-967.

Lindström B. For the best interest of the child – UN Convention on the rights of the child. In Lindström B and Spencer N, Editors, Social Paediatrics. Oxford University Press, 1995. Editorial Journal of Human Growth and Development 2013; 24(1): 7-10

Downloads

Publicado

2014-02-01

Edição

v. 24 n. 1 (2014)

Seção

Editorial

Licença

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis