FACTORS RELATED TO MOTOR DEVELOPMENTAL DELAY OF NEWBORNS

Autores

  • Andréa Januário da Silva Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, UFJF; Núcleo Interdisciplinar de Estudos do Desenvolvimento Infantil - NIEDI, Faculdade de Fisioterapia, UFJF; 3Núcleo de Assessoria, Treinamento e Estudos em Saúde - NATES, UFJF, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brasil./Mestre em Saúde Coletiva (UFJF), Departamento de. Saúde Coletiva - Faculdade de Medicina-UFJF.
  • Luiz Antônio Tavares Neves Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, UFJF; Núcleo Interdisciplinar de Estudos do Desenvolvimento Infantil - NIEDI, Faculdade de Fisioterapia, UFJF; 3Núcleo de Assessoria, Treinamento e Estudos em Saúde - NATES, UFJF, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brasil./Doutor Saúde da Mulher e da Criança (IFF); Professor adjunto do Departamento de. Saúde Coletiva - Faculdade de Medicina-UFJF.
  • Jaqueline da Silva Frônio Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, UFJF; Núcleo Interdisciplinar de Estudos do Desenvolvimento Infantil - NIEDI, Faculdade de Fisioterapia, UFJF; 3Núcleo de Assessoria, Treinamento e Estudos em Saúde - NATES, UFJF, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brasil./Doutora em Ciências Médicas pela Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP); Professora Adjunta da Faculdade de Fisioterapia da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Juiz de Fora, MG, Brasil.
  • Luiz Claudio Ribeiro Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, UFJF; Núcleo Interdisciplinar de Estudos do Desenvolvimento Infantil - NIEDI, Faculdade de Fisioterapia, UFJF; 3Núcleo de Assessoria, Treinamento e Estudos em Saúde - NATES, UFJF, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brasil./Doutor em Demografia pela UFMG, Professor Associado do Departamento de Estatística do Instituto de Ciências Exatas da UFJF, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brasil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.88970

Palavras-chave:

child’s health, child development, newborn, risk factors, public health.

Resumo

Introduction: Studies on the association between motor developmental delay and events observed during the neonatal period are performed after discharge. In such cases, the associations found may be interfered by factors occurring between discharge from the NICU and evaluation. Evaluate newborns before hospital discharge can prevent these effects.The purpose of this study is to identify factors related to motor developmental delay of newborns when being discharged from Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. The method chosen to carry out this investigation was a prospective cohort, populationbased and analytic-descriptive study, and 178 newborns were assessed through the Test of Infant Motor Performance. Binomial logistic regression has been developed for analyzing the associated factors. Among the results obtained, 58.4% of them were premature, 56.2% were low weight newborns and 59.0% were male. The participants were selected among those with the following characteristics: Birth Weight (BW) 2304.3 g, Gestational Age (GA) 35.33 weeks. Morbidity occurred in 23.6% of the participants and 34.8% showed changes in the motor performance (64.7% in the ones below 1501g and 27.8% in the ones above 1500g). Upon completion of the TIMP, it was possible to conclude that the factors associated with motor developmental delay in the binomial logistic regression were prematurity, seizures, being female.

Referências

Spittle AJ, Treyvaud K, Doyle LW, Roberts G, Lee KJ, Inder TE, et al. Early emergence of behavior and social-emotional problems in very preterm infants. J Am Acad Child AdolescPsychiatry. 2009 Sep;48(9):909-18.

Santos RS, Araújo AP, Porto MA. Early diagnosis of abnormal development of preterm newborns: assessment instruments. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2008 Jul-Aug;84(4):289-99.

Mercier CE, Dunn MS, Ferrelli KR, Howard DB, Soll RF. Neurodevelopmental outcome of extremely low birth weight infants from the Vermont Oxford network: 1998-2003. Neonatology. 2010 Jun;97(4):329-38. Epub 2009 Nov 24.

Gargus RA, Vohr BR, Tyson JE, High P, Higgins RD, Wrage LA, et al. Unimpaired outcomes for extremely low birth weight infants at 18 to 22 months. Pediatrics. 2009 Jul;124(1):112-21.

Moster, D., Lie, R.T., &Maskestad, T. Long-term medical and social consequences of preterm birth. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2008; 359: 262-273.

Peralta-Carcelen M, Moses M, Adams-Chapman I, Gantz M, Vohr BR. Stability of neuromotor outcomes at 18 and 30 months of age after extremely low birth weight status. Pediatrics. 2009 May;123(5):e887-95.

Tyson JE, Parikh NA, Langer J, Green C, Higgins RD. Intensive care for extreme prematurity—moving beyond gestational age. N Engl J Med. 2008 Apr 17;358(16):1672-81.

Hintz SR, Kendrick DE, Vohr BR, Poole WK, Higgins RD. Community supports after surviving extremely low-birth-weight, extremely preterm birth: special outpatient services in early childhood. Arch PediatrAdolesc Med. 2008 Aug;162(8):748-55.

Barros FC, Diaz-Rossello JL. Redes multicêntricas e qualidade da atenção neonatal. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2004;80:254-6.

Vermont Oxford Network. Manual of operations for infants born in 2009: Release 13.2. 2009.173p.

Vermont Oxford Network. Neonatal Encephalopathy Registry: Manual of operations. Version 3.3. 2009. 109p.

Campbell SK. The Test of Infant Motor Performance. Test User´s Manual Version 2.0. Chigago; 2005. 37p.

Lekskulchai R, Cole J. Effect of a developmental program on motor performance in infants born preterm. Aust J Physiother. 2001;47(3):169-76.

Kolobe THA, Bulanda M, Susma l. Predicting motor outcome at preschool age for infants tested at 7, 30, 60, and 90 days after term age using the Test of Infant Motor Performance. PhysTher. 2004:84(12):1144-56.

Campbell SK, Kolobe THA, Wright BD, Linacre JM. Validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance for prediction of 6-, 9- and 12-month scores on the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002;44: 263–272.

Petrini JR, Dias T, McCormick MC, Massolo ML, Green NS, Escobar GJ. Increased risk of adverse neurological development for late preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2009 Feb;154(2):169-76.

Rugolo LMSS. Crescimento e desenvolvimento a longo prazo do prematuro extremo. J. pediatr. (Rio J.) 2005 mar.;81(1 supl):101-10.

Farel AM, Hooper SR, Teplin SW, Henry MM, Kraybill EN. Very-low-birthweight infants at seven years: an assessment of the health and neurodevelopmental risk conveyed by chronic lung disease. J Learn Disabil 1998; 31(2):118-26.

Spinillo A, Viazzo F, Colleoni R, Chiara A, Maria Cerbo R, Fazzi E. Two-year infant neurodevelopmental outcome after single or multiple antenatal courses of corticosteroids to prevent complications of prematurity. Am J ObstetGynecol. 2004 Jul; 191 (1): 217-24.

Kiran PSS, Dutta S, Narang A, Bhansali A, Malhi P. Multiple Courses of Antenatal Steroids. Indian J Pediatr2007;74 (5):463-9.

Nicolau CM. et al. Desempenho motor em recém-nascidos pré-termo de alto risco. RevBrasCresc e Desenv Hum 2011; 21(2):327-334.

Souza, T.G.,Stopíglia, M.S.,Baracat, E.C. Avaliação neurológica de recém-nascidos prétermo de muito baixo peso com displasia broncopulmonar. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2009;27(1):21-7.

Singer LT, Siegel AC, Lewis B, Hawkins S, Yamashita T, Baley J. Preschool language outcomes of children with history of bronchopulmonary dysplasia and very low birth weight. J Dev BehavPediatr2001; 22(1):19-26.

Katz-Salamon M, Gerner EM, Jonsson B, Lagercrantz, H. Early motor and mental development in very preterm infants with cronic lung disease. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal 2000; 83(1): F1-F6.

Holcroft CJ, Blakemore KJ , Allen M, Graham EM. Association of prematurity and neonatal infection with neurologic morbidity in very low birth weight infants. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101(6):1249-53.

Moreira RS, Figueiredo EM. Instruments of assessment for first two years of life of infant; Journal of Human Growth and Development 2013; 23(2): 215-221.

Silva NDSH et al. Instrumentos de avaliação do desenvolvimento infantil de recém-nascidos prematuros. Rev. Bras. Cresc. e Desenv. Hum. 2011; 21(1): 85-98.

Herrero D et al. Escalas de desenvolvimento motor em lactentes: Test of Infant Motor Performance e a Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Rev. Bras. Cresc. e Desenv. Hum. 2011; 21(1):122-132.

Mukerji A, Belik J Impact of birth-weight on adult minor illness. Journal of Human Growth and Development 2013; 23(1): 7-10.27.

Bellingham-Young DA, Adamson-Macedo EN. The impact of birthweight on adult minor illness: a study on a sub-clinical population.Journal of Human Growth and Development 2013; 23(1): 11-17.

Downloads

Publicado

2014-12-17

Edição

v. 24 n. 3 (2014)

Seção

Pesquisa Original

Licença

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis