Are green areas all the same? the importance of considering typologies of urban green areas to evaluate their benefits in Curitiba
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2359-5361.paam.2022.192983Keywords:
Ecosystem services, Land use and land cover, NDVI, Urban arborization, Urban forest, vegetation qualityAbstract
Urban green areas (UGA) are open spaces, predominantly with vegetation cover, which generate important ecosystem services to cities, such as microclimate improvement, water security, and physical and mental health of its inhabitants. Usually, UGA are considered as one in urban forest studies, although their land cover and vegetation quality may differ from each other. This research aimed to characterize typologies of urban green areas using the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) to investigate whether there is a distinction between them. For this, Curitiba was selected as the study area, a city with 18 types of green areas. The NDVI of the municipality, of the green areas altogether, and of each typology was calculated based on a LANDSAT-8 image and classified as water, non-vegetation, grass and or shrub cover, sparse tree cover, or dense tree cover. In addition, descriptive statistical analysis and t-test for equality between means were performed. Results showed differences between most typologies, with high amplitude between minimum, maximum, and mean values, these differing from each other in most cases (72.50%). The proportion occupied by each class also varied between typologies, mainly for grass and or shrub cover (0.00% to 72.22%) and sparse tree cover (5.26% to 80.00%). Therefore, the importance of knowing and qualifying the vegetation of different green areas in future studies is highlighted.
Downloads
References
AKBAR, Tahir Ali et al. Investigative Spatial Distribution and Modelling of Existing and Future Urban Land Changes and Its Impact on Urbanization and Economy. Remote Sensing, Suíça, v. 11, n. 2, 2019. DOI: 10.3390/rs11020105.
AKPINAR, Abdullah; BARBOSA-LEIKER, Celestina; BROOKS, Kerry R. Does Green Space Matter?: Exploring Relationships between Green Space Type and Health Indicators. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, Alemanha, v. 20, p. 407-418, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.10.013.
BARGOS, Danúbia Caporusso; MATIAS, Lindon Fonseca. Áreas verdes urbanas: um estudo de revisão e proposta conceitual. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Arborização Urbana, Curitiba, v. 6, n. 3, p. 172-188, 2011. DOI: 10.5380/revsbau.v6i3.66481.
BEUTE, Femke et al. Types and Characteristics of Urban and Peri-Urban Green Spaces Having an Impact on Human Mental Health and Wellbeing. União Europeia: EKLIPSE report, 2020. Disponível em: https://eklipse.eu/wp-content/uploads/website_db/Calls/CfReview/CfR_Health_green_2020.pdf. Acesso em: 30 ago. 2021.
BIONDI, Daniela. Floresta urbana: conceitos e terminologias. In: BIONDI, Daniela. Floresta urbana. Curitiba: Edição da Autora, 2015. p. 11-27.
BRASIL. Lei n° 9.985, de 18 de julho de 2000. Regulamenta o art. 222, § 1º, incisos I, II, III e VII da Constituição Federal, institui o Sistema Nacional de Unidades de Conservação da Natureza e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, 2000.
BUYADI, Siti Nor Afzan; MOHD, Wan Mohd Naim Wan; MISNI, Alamah. Vegetation’s Role on Modifying Microclimate of Urban Resident. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, Reino Unido, v. 202, p. 400-407, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.244.
CLIFF, Andrew D.; ORD, J. Keith. Spatial Processes: Models and Applications. London: Pion, 1981.
CONNECTED SMART CITIES (CSC). Ranking Connected Smart Cities 2019. Connected Smart Cities, São Paulo, 2019. Disponível em: https://connectedsmartcities.com.br. Acesso em: 11 maio 2021.
CURITIBA. Decreto n° 427, de 20 de outubro de 1983. Define critérios para denominação de áreas públicas ajardinadas. Diário oficial do Município de Curitiba, Curitiba, 1983.
CURITIBA. Lei n° 9.804, de 3 de janeiro de 2000. Cria o Sistema de Unidades de Conservação do Município de Curitiba e estabelece critérios e procedimentos para implantação de novas Unidades de Conservação. Diário oficial do Município de Curitiba, Curitiba, n. 1, 2000.
CURITIBA. Lei n° 15.744, de 27 de outubro de 2020. Dispõe sobre a revisão do Sistema Municipal de Unidades de Conservação de Curitiba e estabelece critérios e procedimentos para a implantação e gestão das unidades de conservação. Diário oficial do Município de Curitiba, Curitiba, n. 204, 2020.
EKKEL, E. Dinand; DE VRIES, Sjerp. Nearby Green Space and Human Health: Evaluating Accessibility Metrics. Landscape and Urban Planning, Holanda, v. 157, p. 214-220, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.06.008.
FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION (FAO). Guidelines on Urban and Peri-Urban Forestry. Roma: FAO, 2016. (FAO Forestry Paper, 178).
FARES, Silvano et al. Urban Forests and the Time of COVID-19 Protect us from Fine Dust. Forest@: Journal of Silviculture and Forest Ecology, Itália, v. 17, p. 48-51, 2020. DOI: 10.3832/efor3494-017.
FARYADI, Shirin; TAHERI, Shirin. Interconnections of Urban Green Spaces and Environmental Quality of Tehran. International Journal of Environmental Research, Suíça, v. 3, n. 2, p. 199-208, 2009.
FUNDAÇÃO BRASILEIRA PARA O DESENVOLVIMENTO SUSTENTÁVEL (FBDS). Projeto de mapeamento em alta resolução dos biomas brasileiros. [S. l.: s. n.], 2020. Disponível em: https://geo.fbds.org.br. Acesso em: 30 jun. 2020.
GERRISH, Ed; WATKINS, Shannon Lea. The Relationship between Urban Forests and Income: A Meta-Analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning, Holanda, v. 170, p. 293-308, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.09.005.
GRISE, Mayssa Mascarenhas; BIONDI, Daniela; ARAKI, Hideo. Distribuição espacial e cobertura de vegetação das tipologias de áreas verdes de Curitiba (PR). Floresta e Ambiente, Rio de Janeiro, v. 23, n. 4, 2016. DOI: 10.1590/2179-8087.127715.
HUANG, Sha et al. A Commentary Review on the Use of Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) in the Era of Popular Remote Sensing. Journal of Forestry Research, China, v. 32, n. 1, p. 1-6, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s11676-020-01155-1.
INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA (IBGE). Manual técnico da vegetação brasileira. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 1992.
INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA (IBGE). Biomas e sistema costeiro-marinho do Brasil: compatível com a escala 1:250.000. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 2019.
INTELLIGENT COMMUNITY FORUM (ICF). Smart21 Communities of 2019. [S. l.: s. n.], 2019. Disponível em: https://www.intelligentcommunity.org/smart21. Acesso em: 11 maio 2021.
INTELLIGENT COMMUNITY FORUM (ICF). Smart21 Communities of 2020. Disponível em: https://www.intelligentcommunity.org/smart21. [S. l.: s. n.], 2020. Acesso em: 11 maio 2021.
INTELLIGENT COMMUNITY FORUM (ICF). Smart21 Communities of 2021. Disponível em: https://www.intelligentcommunity.org/smart21. [S. l.: s. n.], 2021. Acesso em: 11 maio 2021.
INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS (INPE). Catálogo de imagens: divisão de Geração de Imagens. [S. l.: s. n.], 2020. Disponível em: https://www.dgi.inpe.br. Acesso em: 1 fev. 2021.
INSTITUTO DE PESQUISA E PLANEJAMENTO URBANO DE CURITIBA (IPPUC). Curitiba em Dados. [S. l.: s. n.], 2021. Disponível em: http://www.ippuc.org.br. Acesso em: 6 maio 2021.
INTERNATIONAL PLATFORM ON BIODIVERSITY AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES (IPBES). Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Bonn: IPBES Secretariat, 2019.
KANANI-SADAT, Yousef et al. A New Approach to Flood Susceptibility Assessment in Data-Scarce and Ungauged Regions Based on GIS-Based Hybrid Multi Criteria Decision-Making Method. Journal of Hydrology, Holanda, v. 572, p. 17-31, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.02.034.
KIM, Hyun Woo et al. Exploring the Impact of Green Space Health on Runoff Reduction Using NDVI. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, Alemanha, v. 28, p. 81-87, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.10.010.
KHOSRAVI, Khabat et al. A GIS-Based Flood Susceptibility Assessment and Its Mapping in Iran: A Comparison between Frequency Ratio and Weights-of-Evidence Bivariate Statistical Models with Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Technique. Natural Hazards, Holanda, v. 83, n. 2, p. 947-987, 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s11069-016-2357-2.
KRIEGLER, Frank J. et al. Preprocessing Transformations and Their Effect on Multispectral Recognition. In: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 6., 1969, Ann Arbor. Proceedings […]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1969. p. 97-132.
MARONI, Daniela; CARDOSO, Grace Tibério; NECKEL, Alcindo; MACULAN, Laércio Stolfo; OLIVEIRA, Marcos L. S.; BODAH, Eliane Thaines; BODAH, Brian William; SANTOSH, M. Land surface temperature and vegetation index as a proxy to microclimate. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, v. 9, n. 4, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.105796
MARTINI, Angeline et al. Análise microclimática das diferentes tipologias de floresta urbana de Curitiba. Floresta, Curitiba, v. 47, n. 2, 137-144, 2017. DOI: 10.5380/rf.v47il.49518.
MARTINI, Angeline; BIONDI, Daniela; BATISTA, Antônio Carlos. A influência das diferentes tipologias de floresta urbana no microclima do entorno imediato. Ciência Florestal, Santa Maria, v. 28, n. 3, 2018. DOI: 10.5902/1980509833381.
PARANÁ. Ministério Público. Manual para elaboração do Plano Municipal de Arborização Urbana. 2. ed. Curitiba: Procuradoria-Geral de Justiça, 2018.
MORATO; Rúbia Gomes; MACHADO, Reinaldo Paul Pérez; MARTINES, Marcos Roberto. Mapeamento da justiça ambiental e racismo ambiental na bacia do Córrego do Morro do “S”, São Paulo (SP). Geoambiente On-Line, Goiânia, n. 30, p. 214-233, 2018. DOI: 10.5216/revgeoamb.v0i30.51683.
MYERS, Norman et al. Biodiversity Hotspots for Conservation Priorities. Nature, Reino Unido, v. 403, p. 853-857, 2000. DOI: 10.1038/35002501.
REZENDE, Camila Linhares et al. From Hotspot to Hopespot: An Opportunity for the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, Brasil, v. 16, n. 4, p. 208-214, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.pecon.2018.10.002.
SIKORSKA, Daria et al. The Role of Informal Green Spaces in Reducing Inequalities in Urban Green Space Availability to Children and Seniors. Environmental Science and Policy, Holanda, v. 108, p. 144-154, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.03.007.
SOMMEECHAI, Montahip et al. Ecological Structure of a Tropical Urban Forest in the Bang Kachao Peninsula, Bangkok. Forests, Suíça, v. 9, n. 1, 2018. DOI: 10.3390/f9010036.
SOWIŃSKA-ŚWIERKOSZ, Barbara; MICHALIK-ŚNIEŻEK, Malwina. The Methodology of Landscape Quality (LQ) Indicators Analysis Based on Remote Sensing Data: Polish National Parks Case Study. Sustainability, Suíça, v. 12, n. 7, 2020. DOI: 10.3390/su12072810.
TANG, Zhiyao et al. Effectiveness of Protected Areas in Maintaining Plant Production. PLOS ONE, Estados Unidos, v. 6, n. 4, 2011. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019116.
UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY (USGS). NDVI, the Foundation for Remote Sensing Phenology. [S. l.: s. n.], 2018.
Disponível em: https://www.usgs.gov/core-science-systems/eros/phenology/science/ndvi-foundation-remote-sensing-phenology?qt-science_center_objects=0#qt-science_center_objects. Acesso em: 13 jul. 2021.
VENTER, Zander S. et al. Green Apartheid: Urban Green Infrastructure Remains Unequally Distributed Across Income and Race Geographies in South Africa. Landscape and Urban Planning, Holanda, v. 203, 103889, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103889.
WOOD, Emma et al. Not All Green Space is Created Equal: Biodiversity Predicts Psychological Restorative Benefits from Urban Green Space. Frontiers in Psychology, Suíça, v. 9, 2018. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02320.
XI, Henghui et al. Spatiotemporal Evolution Characteristics of Ecosystem Service Values Based on NDVI Changes in Island Cities. IEEE Access, Estados Unidos, v. 9, p. 12922-12931, 2021. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3051244.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Jennifer Viezzer, Daniela Biondi, Angeline Martini, Fabio Rubio Scarano
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
A revista Paisagem e Ambiente: ensaios tem licença Creative Commons
Creative Commons - Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0 Internacional
DIADORIM - Diretório de Políticas Editoriais
O detentor dos direitos autorais é o autor do artigo. A revista exige apenas o ineditismo na publicação do artigo. O autor tem do direito de divulgar seu artigo conforme sua conveniência.
