Teachers’ motivation for teaching in higher education: portuguese validation of a questionnaire
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e3104Keywords:
Intrinsic motivation, Teachers, Higher educationAbstract
Motivation for teaching is key in the establishment and further development of high-quality higher education, as it affects teachers’ investment in quality learning experiences for their students, as well as institutional efficacy and well-being. This study aimed to validate a questionnaire, originally developed in Belgium, designed to evaluate three dimensions (self-efficacy, interest, and effort) of intrinsic motivation for teaching for a different national population. The sample consisted of 616 academics working in public higher education institutions in Portugal. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted and internal consistency of items analyzed. The results show that the original dimensionality of the construct is confirmed in the Portuguese teachers’ sample. Motivation for teaching in the Portuguese context is primarily explained by the following factors: personal efficacy, interest in the task, and effort placed on teaching responsibilities. A difference was found in that personal efficacy could not be divided in context and general personal efficacy.
Downloads
References
Aldridge, J. M., & Fraser, B. J. (2016). Teachers’ views of their school climate and its relationship with teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction. Learning Environments Research, 19(2), 291-307. doi:10.1007/s10984-015-9198-x
Armor, D. J., Conry-Oseguera, P., Cox, M., King, N. J., McDonnell, L. M., Pascal, A. H., … Zellman, G. L. (1976). Analysis of the school preferred reading programs in selected Los Angeles minority schools. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation. Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/reports/2005/R2007.pdf
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Worth.
Bandura, A., Azzi, R. G., & Polydoro, S. (2008). Teoria social cognitiva: Conceitos básicos [Cognitive social theory: Basic concepts]. Porto Alegre, RS: Artmed.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
Blaskova, M., Blasko, R., Figurska, I., & Sokol, A. (2015). Motivation and development of the university teachers’ motivational competence. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 182, 116-126. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.746
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology, 49(1), 14-23. doi:10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.14
Dybowski, C., & Harendza, S. (2015). Validation of the Physician Teaching Motivation Questionnaire (PTMQ). BMC Medical Education, 15, 166. doi:10.1186/s12909-015-0448-5
Dybowski, C., Sehner, S., & Harendza, S. (2017). Influence of motivation, self-efficacy and situational factors on the teaching quality of clinical educators. BMC Medical Education, 17, 84. doi:10.1186/s12909-017-0923-2
El Alfy, S., & David, S. A. (2017). Investigating organisational justice in higher education in UAE. International Journal of Management in Education, 11(2), 163-187. doi:10.1504/IJMIE.2017.083355
Esdar, W., Gorges, J., & Wild, E. (2015). The role of basic need satisfaction for junior academics’ goal conflicts and teaching motivation. Higher Education, 72(2), 175-190. doi:10.1007/s10734-015-9944-0
Flores, M. A., & Niklasson, L. (2014). Why do student teachers enroll for a teaching degree? A study of teacher recruitment in Portugal and Sweden. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 40(4), 328-343. doi:10.1080/02607476.2014.929883
Garcia, N. R., & Boruchovitch, E. (2014). Atribuições de causalidade para o desempenho escolar e resiliência em estudantes [Causal attributions for school performance and resilience of students]. Psico-USF, 19(2), 277-286. doi:10.1590/1413-82712014019002003
Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569-582. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.569
Gunersel, A. B., Kaplan, A., Barnett, P., Etienne, M., & Ponnock, A. R. (2016). Profiles of change in motivation for teaching in higher education at an American research university. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(6), 628-643. doi:10.1080/13562517.2016.1163668
Han, J., & Yin, H. (2016). Teacher motivation: Definition, research development and implications for teachers. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1217819. doi:10.1080/2331186X.2016.1217819
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
Iacobucci, D. (2009). Everything you always wanted to know about SEM (structural equations modeling) but were afraid to ask. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(4), 673-680. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2009.09.002
Inigo, M., & Raufaste, E. (2019). Academics’ motivations explain time-allocation and well-being at work. European Review of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 19-30. doi:10.1016/j.erap.2018.11.002
Katz, I., & Shahar, B.-H. (2015). What makes a motivating teacher? Teachers’ motivation and beliefs as predictors of their autonomy-supportive style. School Psychology International, 36(6), 575-588. doi:10.1177/0143034315609969
Kheir-Faddul, N., & Dănăiaţă, D. (2019). The influence of leadership style on teachers’ job motivation and satisfaction in the Druze sector of Israel. Timisoara Journal of Economics and Business, 12(1), 17-42. doi:10.2478/tjeb-2019-0002
Kiziltepe, K. (2008). Motivation and demotivation of university teachers. Teachers and Teaching, 14(5-6), 515-530. doi:10.1080/13540600802571361
Lam, W.-H. (2012). The study of teacher efficacy in Hong Kong sub-degree sector. Education Research International, 2012, 265293. doi:10.1155/2012/265293
indawi Publishing Corporation
Education Research International
Volume 2012, Article ID 265293, 6 pages
doi:10.1155/2012/265293
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Education Research International
Volume 2012, Article ID 265293, 6 pages
doi:10.1155/2012/265293
Machado-Taylor, M. L., Soares, V. M., Brites, R., Ferreira, J. B., Farhangmehr, M., Gouveia, O. M. R., & Peterson, M. (2016). Academic job satisfaction and motivation: Findings from a nationwide study in Portuguese higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 41(3), 541-559. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.942265
Miller, A. D., Ramirez, E. M., & Murdock, T. B. (2017). The influence of teachers’ self-efficacy on perceptions: Perceived teacher competence and respect and student effort and achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 64, 260-269. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.02.008
O’Keefe, P. A., Dweck, C. S., & Walton, G. M. (2018). Implicit theories of interest: Finding your passion or developing it? Psychological Science, 29(10), 1653-1664. doi:10.1177/0956797618780643
Oliden, P. E., & Zumbo, B. D. (2008). Coeficientes de fiabilidad para escalas de respuesta categórica ordenada [Reliability coefficients for ordinal response scales]. Psicothema 20(4), 896-901. Retrieved from http://www.psicothema.com/pdf/3572.pdf
Palermo, C., & Thomson, M. M. (2019). Large-scale assessment as professional development: Teachers’ motivations, ability beliefs, and values. Teacher Development, 23(2), 192-212. doi:10.1080/13664530.2018.1536612
Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Ramos, M. P. H., Ramos, E. M. L., Pontes, F. A. R., Casanova, D. C. G., Silva, S. S. C., & Azzi, R G. (2018). Characterization of basic education teachers based on the Social Cognitive Model of Job Satisfaction. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 28, e2811. doi:10.1590/1982-4327e2811
Raykov, T. (2001). Estimation of congeneric scale reliability using covariance structure analysis with nonlinear constraints. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 54(Pt 2), 315-323. doi:10.1348/000711001159582
Saglam, A. C. (2007). Motivation of academics: An empirical assessment of Herzberg’s theory. International Journal of Educational Reform, 16(3), 260-274. doi:10.1177/105678790701600302
Schiefele, U. (2009). Situation and individual interests. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 197-222). New York, NY: Routledge.
Schiefele, U., & Schaffner, E. (2015). Teacher interests, mastery goals, and self-efficacy as predictors of instructional practices and student motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 159-171. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.06.005
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2017). Motivated for teaching? Associations with school goal structure, teacher self-efficacy, job satisfaction and emotional exhaustion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 152-160. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.006
Slavich, G. M., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2012). Transformational teaching: Theoretical underpinnings, basic principles, and core methods. Educational Psychology Review, 24(4), 569-608. doi:10.1007/s10648-012-9199-6
Schneider, M., & Preckel, F. (2017). Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 143(6), 565- 600. doi:10.1037/bul0000098
Stankovska, G., Angelkoska, S., Osmani, F., & Grncarovska, S. P. (2017). Job motivation and job satisfaction among academic staff in higher education. In N. Popov, C. Wolhuter, J. Kalin, G. Hilton, J. Ogunleye, E. Niemczyk, & O. Chigisheva (Eds.), Current business and economics driven discourse and education: Perspectives from around the world (Vol. 15, pp. 159-166). Sofia, Bulgaria: Bulgarian Comparative Education Society.
Uiterwijk-Luijk, L., Krüger, M., Zijlstra, B., & Volman, M. (2017). Inquiry-based leadership: The influence of affective attitude, experienced social pressure and self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(5), 492-509. doi:10.1108/JEA-12-2015-0114
Veiga-Simão, A.-M., Flores, M.-A., Barros, A., Fernandes, S., & Mesquita, D. (2015). Perceptions of university teachers about teaching and the quality of pedagogy in higher education: A study in Portugal. Infancia y Aprendizaje: Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 38(1), 102-143. doi:10.1080/02103702.2014.996408
Viseu, J., Jesus, S. N., Rus, C., Canavarro, J. M., & Pereira, J. (2016). Relationship between teacher motivation and organizational variables: A literature review. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 26(63), 111-120. doi:10.1590/1982-43272663201613
Visser-Wijnveen, G. J., Stes, A., & Van Petegem, P. (2012). Development and validation of a questionnaire measuring teachers’ motivations for teaching in higher education. Higher Education, 64(3), 421-436. doi:10.1007/s10734-011-9502-3
Visser-Wijnveen, G. J., Stes, A., & Van Petegem, P. (2014). Clustering teachers' motivations for teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(6), 644-656. doi:10.1080/13562517.2014.901953
Weiner, B. (2000). Intrapersonal and interpersonal theories of motivation from an attributional perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 12(1), 1-14. doi:10.1023/A:1009017532121
Yada, A., Tolvanen, A., Malinen, O. P., Imai-Matsumura, K., Shimada, H., Koike, R., & Savolainen, H. (2019). Teachers' self-efficacy and the sources of efficacy: A cross-cultural investigation in Japan and Finland. Teaching and Teacher Education, 81, 13-24. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2019.01.014
Zabalza, M. A. (2007). La enseñanza universitária: El escenario y sus protagonistas [University teaching: The scenery and its actors]. Madrid, España: Narcea.
Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981-1015. doi:10.3102/0034654315626801
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Editorial Board authorizes free access to and distribution of published contentes, provided that the source is cited, that is, granding credit to the authors and Paidéia and preserving the full text. The author is allowed to place the final version (postprint / editor’s PDF) in an institutional/thematic repositor or personal page (site, blog), immediately after publication, provided that it is available for open access and comes without any embargo period. Full reference should be made to the first publication in Paidéia. Access to the paper should at least be aligned with the access the journal offers.
As a legal entity, the University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto School of Philosophy, Sciences and Languages owns and holds the copyright deriving from the publication. To use the papers, Paidéia adopts the Creative Commons Licence, CC BY-NC non-commercial attribution. This licence permits access, download, print, share, reuse and distribution of papers, provided that this is for non-commercial use and that the source is cited, giving due authorship credit to Paidéia. In these cases, neither authors nor editors need any permission.
When deriving from research involving human beings, manuscripts need IRB approval, in compliance with the guidelines and standards of the Brazilian National Health Council Resolution 196/96 – Ministry of Health. Authors should attach the digital copy of the IRB declaration of approval, according to instructions displayed further ahead.
