Evaluation of the implementation process of the #Tamojunto2.0 prevention program in Brazilian schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e3220Keywords:
Implementation science, Program evaluation, Drug abuse prevention, Adolescents, SchoolsAbstract
The #Tamojunto2.0 program (Unplugged) has been evaluated in Brazil in order to support its implementation as a national public policy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation process of the #Tamojunto2.0 school-based program, disseminated by the Ministry of Health, in the prevention of alcohol and other drug use among adolescents. This is a mixed-methods study. The sample consisted of 13 teachers and eight managers of 8th grade classes of elementary education public schools located in two cities, and a training provider professional for the program’s application. Observation, evaluation and semi-structured interview forms were used. Descriptive and thematic analyses were performed. The results indicate low implementation fidelity, good quality in the application of the program, and high student absenteeism. Aspects which facilitate or hinder implementation of the program are also presented. Such results are relevant for the large-scale implementation of #Tamojunto2.0.
Downloads
References
Bartelink, N. H. M., van Assema, P., Jansen, M. W. J., Savelberg, H. H. C. M., Moore, G. F., Hawkins, J., & Kremers, S. P. J. (2019). Process evaluation of the healthy primary school of the future: The key learning points. BMC Public Health, 19(1), 698. doi:10.1186/s12889-019-6947-2
Bowen, D. J., Kreuter, M., Spring, B., Cofta-Woerpel, L., Linnan, L., Weiner, D., … Fernandez, M. (2009). How we design feasibility studies. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36(5), 452-457. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002
Bradshaw, C. P., & Pas, E. T. (2011). A statewide scale up of positive behavioral interventions and supports: A description of the development of systems of support and analysis of adoption and implementation. School Psychology Review, 40(4), 530-548. doi:10.1080/02796015.2011.12087528
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cook, P. J., Dodge, K. A., Gifford, E. J., & Schulting, A. B. (2017). A new program to prevent primary school absenteeism: Results of a pilot study in five schools. Children and Youth Services Review, 82(1), 262-270. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.09.017
Danna, M. F., & Matos, M. A. (1982). Ensinando observação: Uma introdução [Teaching observation: An introduction]. São Paulo, SP: Edicon.
Dusenbury, L., & Hansen, W. B. (2004). Pursuing the course from research to practice. Prevention Science, 5(1), 55-59. doi:10.1023/B:PREV.0000013982.20860.19
Faggiano, F., Galanti, M. R., Bohrn, K., Burkhart, G., Vigna-Taglianti, F., Cuomo, L., … The EU-Dap Study Group. (2008). The effectiveness of a school-based substance abuse prevention program: EU-Dap cluster randomised controlled trial. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 47(5), 537-543. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.06.018
Forman, S. G., Shapiro, E. S., Codding, R. S., Gonzales, J. E., Reddy, L. A., Rosenfield, S. A., … Stoiber, K. C. (2013). Implementation science and school psychology. School Psychology Quarterly, 28(2), 77-100. doi:10.1037/spq0000019
Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., & Fixsen, D. L. (2017). Implementing effective educational practices at scales of social importance. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 20(1), 25-35. doi:10.1007/s10567-017-0224-7
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2021). Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde do Escolar: 2019 [National Adolescent School-based Health Survey: 2019]. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Autor. Retrieved from https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv101852.pdf
Kok, G., Gottlieb, N. H., Peters, G. J. Y., Mullen, P. D., Parcel, G. S., Ruiter, R. A. C., … Bartholomew, L. K. (2016). A taxonomy of behaviour change methods: An Intervention Mapping approach. Health Psychology Review, 10(3), 297-312. doi:10.1080/17437199.2015.1077155
Leeman, J., Birken, S. A., Powell, B. J., Rohweder, C., & Shea, C. M. (2017). Beyond implementation strategies: Classifying the full range of strategies used in implementation science and practice. Implementation Science, 12, 125. doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0657-x
Medeiros, P. F. P., Pereira, A. P. D., Schneider, D. R., & Sanchez, Z. M. (2018). Percepções da comunidade escolar sobre a implantação do programa unplugged em escolas [School community perceptions on implementation of the unplugged program in schools]. Psicologia Escolar e Educacional, 22(1), 173-184. doi:10.1590/2175-35392018014256
Mercer, S. H., McIntosh, K., & Hoselton, R. (2017). Comparability of fidelity measures for assessing tier 1 school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 19(4), 195-204. doi:10.1177/1098300717693384
Mihalic, S. F., Fagan, A. A., & Argamaso, S. (2008). Implementing the LifeSkills Training drug prevention program: Factors related to implementation fidelity. Implementation Science, 3, 5. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-3-5
Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de Ações Programáticas Estratégicas. (2018). Programa #Tamojunto: Prevenção na escola: Guia do professor [#Tamojunto Program: Prevention at school: Teacher’s guide]. Brasília, DF: Autor. Retrieved from https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/programa_tamojunto_prevencao_escola_guia_professor.pdf
Morrison, J. Q., Newman, D. S., & Erickson, A. G. (2021). Process evaluation of literacy practices within a multi-tiered system of supports framework. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 37(2), 140-164. doi:10.1080/15377903.2020.1804030
Moullin, J. C., Dickson, K. S., Stadnick, N. A., Rabin, B., & Aarons, G. A. (2019). Systematic review of the exploration, preparation, implementation, sustainment (EPIS) framework. Implementation Science, 14, 1. doi:10.1186/s13012-018-0842-6
Nelson, C., & Madiba, S. (2020). Barriers to the implementation of the ward-based outreach team program in Mpumalanga Province: Results from process evaluation. Journal of Primary Care and Community Health, 11(1), 1-13. doi:10.1177/2150132720975552
Organização para a Cooperação e Desenvolvimento Econômico. (2016). Brasil no PISA 2015: Análises e reflexões sobre o desempenho dos estudantes brasileiros [Brazil in PISA 2015: Analyzes and reflections on Brazilian students’ performance]. São Paulo, SP: Fundação Santillana. Retrieved from https://download.inep.gov.br/acoes_internacionais/pisa/resultados/2015/pisa2015_completo_final_baixa.pdf
Sanchez, Z. M., Valente, J. Y., Galvão, P. P., Gubert, F. A., Melo, M. H. S, Caetano, S. C., ... Cogo-Moreira, H. (2021). A cluster randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of the school-based drug prevention program #Tamojunto2.0. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 116(6), 1580-1592. doi:10.1111/add.15358
Throuvala, M. A., Griffiths, M. D., Rennoldson, M., & Kuss, D. J. (2019). School-based prevention for adolescent internet addiction: Prevention is the key: A systematic literature review. Current Neuropharmacology, 17(6), 507-525. doi:10.2174/1570159X16666180813153806
Márcia Helena da Silva Melo is a Professor of the Instituto de Psicologia of the Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo-SP, Brazil.
Iara da Silva Freitas is a Ph.D. candidate of the Instituto de Psicologia at the Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo-SP, Brazil.
Luiza Chagas Brandão is a Ph.D. candidate of the Instituto de Psicologia at the Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo-SP, Brazil.
Fabiane do Amaral Gubert is a Professor of the Departamento de Enfermagem of the Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza-CE, Brazil.
Lidiane Nogueira Rebouças is a Coordinator of the Secretaria da Proteção Social, Justiça, Cidadania, Mulheres e Direitos Humanos do Governo do Estado do Ceará, Fortaleza-CE, Brazil.
Zila van der Meer Sanchez is a Professor of the Preventive Medicine Department of the Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo-SP, Brazil.
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Editorial Board authorizes free access to and distribution of published contentes, provided that the source is cited, that is, granding credit to the authors and Paidéia and preserving the full text. The author is allowed to place the final version (postprint / editor’s PDF) in an institutional/thematic repositor or personal page (site, blog), immediately after publication, provided that it is available for open access and comes without any embargo period. Full reference should be made to the first publication in Paidéia. Access to the paper should at least be aligned with the access the journal offers.
As a legal entity, the University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto School of Philosophy, Sciences and Languages owns and holds the copyright deriving from the publication. To use the papers, Paidéia adopts the Creative Commons Licence, CC BY-NC non-commercial attribution. This licence permits access, download, print, share, reuse and distribution of papers, provided that this is for non-commercial use and that the source is cited, giving due authorship credit to Paidéia. In these cases, neither authors nor editors need any permission.
When deriving from research involving human beings, manuscripts need IRB approval, in compliance with the guidelines and standards of the Brazilian National Health Council Resolution 196/96 – Ministry of Health. Authors should attach the digital copy of the IRB declaration of approval, according to instructions displayed further ahead.
