Use of microhabitats affects butterfly assemblages in a rural landscape

Keywords: Atlantic Rainforest, Landscape fragmentation, Host plants, Species list


Landscapes composed of small rural properties may support highly heterogeneous habitat, because they often support distinct types of land uses adjacent to surrounding forest fragments. Many butterfly species may benefit from this kind of landscape, as very distinct microhabitats can be found in a very restricted spatial scale. To better understand how different microhabitats are related to fragmentation in rural landscapes the present study collected the butterfly fauna in 18 sampling point sites, representing distinct types of forest edges and forest interiors. Although closely located, these sites showed no spatial autocorrelation. Instead, a major distinction in species richness and composition was found among forest interior and edge habitats while no significant difference was found in species composition among distinct edge habitats. Therefore, the high segregation of butterfly assemblages found in a very restricted geographic scale suggests the presence of two different groups of butterflies that respond independently to forest fragmentation, the forest interior assemblages and forest edge assemblages. This distinction of butterfly assemblages related to forest interior and forest edges were already reported, but our results highlights that these differences are found mostly due to species turnover between those habitats. In other words, both microhabitat types present a high number of specialized species compared to a smaller fraction of generalist species that may occurs in both microhabitats. Althoug, in the case of Atlantic Forest the species of special conservation concern are those true specialized in forest interior habitats and not those specialized in forest edges, the present study corroborates the importance of sampling different microhabitats when studying fragmentation processes, both inside and outside of fragments. Although forest edges may present different kinds of habitat types, species present along border tend to be as heterogeneous as species present in different locations inside the forest. This information should be considered in sampling designs of biodiversity essays that focus on a more consistent representation of local diversity.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Elton Orlandin, Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Departamento de Zoologia (DZOO) - Curitiba, PR, Brasil.

Avenida Coronel Francisco Heráclito dos Santos, 100, Jardim das Américas, CEP 81531-980, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.

Mônica Piovesan, Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Departamento de Zoologia (DZOO) - Curitiba, PR, Brasil.

Avenida Coronel Francisco Heráclito dos Santos, 100, Jardim das Américas, CEP 81531-980, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.

Fernanda Maurer D’Agostini, Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC) - Joaçaba, SC, Brasil.

Campus de Joaçaba, Rua Getúlio Vargas, 2.125, Bairro Flor da Serra, CEP 89600-000, Joaçaba, SC, Brasil.

Eduardo Carneiro, Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Departamento de Zoologia (DZOO) - Curitiba, PR, Brasil.

Avenida Coronel Francisco Heráclito dos Santos, 100, Jardim das Américas, CEP 81531-980, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.


Albrecht, M.; Schmid, B.; Obrist, M.K.; Schüpbach, B.; Kleijn, D. & Duelli, P. 2010. Effects of ecological compensation meadows on arthropod diversity in adjacent intensively managed grassland. Biological Conservation, 143(3): 642‑649.

Alvares, C.A.; Stape, J.L.; Sentelhas, P.C.; de Moraes Gonçalves, J.L. & Sparovek, G. 2013. Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 22(6): 711‑728.

Andersson, S.; Nilsson, L.A.; Groth, I. & Bergström, G. 2002. Floral scents in butterfly-pollinated plants: Possible convergence in chemical composition. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 140(2): 129‑153.

Baselga, A. 2013. Separating the two components of abundance-based dissimilarity: Balanced changes in abundance vs. abundance gradients. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4(6): 552‑557.

Beccaloni, G.W.; Viloria, A.L. Hall, S.K. & Robinson, G.S. 2008. Catalogue of the hostplants of the Neotropical butterflies / Catálogo de las plantas huésped de las mariposas neotropicales. Zaragoza, Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa. 536p.

Begnini, S. & Almeida, L.E.D.F. de. 2016. Grau de desenvolvimento regional dos municípios da mesorregião oeste catarinense: caracterização e classificação. Interações, Campo Grande, 17(4): 547‑560.

Biezanko, C.M. & Mielke, O.H.H. 1973. Contribuição ao estudo faunístico dos Hesperiidae americanos. IV. Espécies do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil, com notas taxonômicas e descrições de espécies novas (Lepidoptera). Acta Biológica Paranaense, 2: 51‑102.

Biezanko, C.M.; Ruffinelli, A. & Link, D. 1974. Plantas y otras sustancias alimenticias de las orugas de los lepidópteros uruguayos. Revista do Centro de Ciências Rurais, 4: 107‑148.

Bobo, K.S.; Waltert, M.; Fermon, H.; Njokagbor, J. & Mühlenberg, M. 2006. From forest to farmland: butterfly diversity and habitat associations along a gradient of forest conversion in Southwestern Cameroon. Journal of Insect Conservation, 10(1): 29‑42.

Bonebrake, T.C.; Ponisio, L.C.; Boggs, C.L. & Ehrlich, P.R. 2010. More than just indicators: A review of tropical butterfly ecology and conservation. Biological Conservation, 143(8): 1831‑1841.

Brito, M.M.; Ribeiro, D.B.; Raniero, M.; Hasui, É.; Ramos, F.N. & Arab, A. 2014. Functional composition and phenology of fruit-feeding butterflies in a fragmented landscape: Variation of seasonality between habitat specialists. Journal of Insect Conservation, 18(4): 547‑560.

Brown Jr., K.S. & Freitas, A.V.L. 2002. Butterfly communities of urban forest fragments in Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil: Structure, instability, environmental correlates, and conservation. Journal of Insect Conservation, 6(4): 217‑231.

Brown Jr., K.S. & Hutchings, R.W. 1997. Disturbance, fragmentation, and the dynamics of diversity in Amazonian forest butterflies. In: Laurance, W.F. & Bierregaard Jr., R.O. Tropical forest remnants: Ecology, management, and conservation of fragmented communities. Chicago, Chicago University Press. p. 91‑110.

Brown, K. 1992. Borboletas da Serra do Japi: Diversidade, habitats, recursos alimentares e variação temporal. In: Morellto, L.P.C. História Natural da Serra do Japi: Ecologia e Preservação de uma área Florestal no Sudeste do Brasil. Campinas, UNICAMP. p. 142‑186.

Buchmann, C.M.; Schurr, F.M.; Nathan, R. & Jeltsch, F. 2013. Habitat loss and fragmentation affecting mammal and bird communities.The role of interspecific competition and individual space use. Ecological Informatics, 14: 90‑98.

Carneiro, E.; Mielke, O.H.H.; Casagrande, M.M. & Fiedler, K. 2014. Skipper richness (Hesperiidae) along elevational gradients in Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Neotropical Entomology, 43(1): 27‑38.

Chao, A. & Jost, L. 2012. Coverage-based rarefaction and extrapolation: Standardizing samples by completeness rather than size. Ecology, 93(12): 2533‑2547.

Cleary, D.F.R. & Genner, M.J. 2004. Changes in rain forest butterfly diversity following major ENSO-induced fires in Borneo. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 13(2): 129‑140.

Collier, N.; Gardner, M.; Adams, M.; McMahon, C.R.; Benkendorff, K. & Mackay, D.A. 2010. Contemporary habitat loss reduces genetic diversity in an ecologically specialized butterfly: Contemporary habitat loss and genetic diversity. Journal of Biogeography, 37(7): 1277‑1287.

De Jong, R. 1982. Secondary sexual characters in Celaenorrhinus and the delimitation of the genus (Lepidoptera, Hesperiidae). Journal of Natural History, 16(5): 695‑705.

Devries, P.J. & Walla, T.R. 2001. Species diversity and community structure in neotropical fruit-feeding butterflies. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 74(1): 1‑15.

Didham, R.K.; Ghazoul, J.; Stork, N.E. & Davis, A.J. 1996. Insects in fragmented forests: A functional approach. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 11(6): 255‑260.

Driscoll, D.A.; Banks, S.C.; Barton, P.S.; Lindenmayer, D.B. & Smith, A.L. 2013. Conceptual domain of the matrix in fragmented landscapes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 28(10): 605‑613.

Duarte, M.; Robbins, R.K. & Mielke, O. H. H. 2005. Immature stages of Calycopis caulonia (Hewitson, 1877) (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae, Theclinae, Eumaeini), with notes on rearing detritivorous hairstreaks on artificial diet. Zootaxa, 1063: 1‑31

Dufrene, M. & Legendre, P. 1997. Species Assemblages and Indicator Species: The Need for a Flexible Asymmetrical Approach. Ecological Monographs, 67(3): 345.

Fahrig, L. 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 487‑515.

Fahrig, L.; Baudry, J.; Brotons, L.; Burel, F.G.; Crist, T.O.; Fuller, R.J.; Sirami, C.; Siriwardena, G.M. & Martin, J.‑L. 2011. Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: Heterogeneity and biodiversity. Ecology Letters, 14(2): 101‑112.

Fahrig, L.; Girard, J.; Duro, D.; Pasher, J.; Smith, A.; Javorek, S.; King, D.; Lindsay, K.F.; Mitchell, S. & Tischendorf, L. 2015. Farmlands with smaller crop fields have higher within-field biodiversity. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 200: 219‑234.

Filgueiras, B.K.C.; Melo, D.H.A.; Leal, I.R.; Tabarelli, M.; Freitas, A.V.L. & Iannuzzi, L. 2016. Fruit-feeding butterflies in edge-dominated habitats: Community structure, species persistence and cascade effect. Journal of Insect Conservation, 20(3): 539‑548.

Filgueiras, B.K.C.; Melo, D.H.A.; Uehara-Prado, M.; Freitas, A.V.L.; Leal, I.R. & Tabarelli, M. 2019. Compensatory dynamics on the community structure of fruit-feeding butterflies across hyper-fragmented Atlantic forest habitats. Ecological Indicators, 98: 276‑284.

Foley, J.A. 2005. Global Consequences of Land Use. Science, 309(5734): 570‑574.

Foley, J.A.; Ramankutty, N.; Brauman, K.A.; Cassidy, E.S.; Gerber, J.S.; Johnston, M.; Mueller, N.D.; O’Connell, C.; Ray, D.K.; West, P.C.; Balzer, C.; Bennett, E.M.; Carpenter, S.R.; Hill, J.; Monfreda, C.; Polasky, S.; Rockström, J.; Sheehan, J.; Siebert, S.; Tilman, D. & Zaks, D.P.M. 2011. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature, 478(7369): 337‑342.

Freitas, A.V.; Kaminski, L.A.; Mielke, O.H.H.; Barbosa, E.P. & Silva-Brandao, K.L. 2012. A new species of Yphthimoides (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Satyrinae) from the southern Atlantic forest region. Zootaxa, 3526: 31‑44.

Gascon, C.; Lovejoy, T.E.; Bierregaard Jr., R.O.; Malcolm, J.R.; Stouffer, P.C.; Vasconcelos, H.L.; Laurance, W.F.; Zimmermann, B.; Tocher, M. & Borges, S. 1999. Matrix habitat and species richness in tropical forest remnants. Biological Conservation, 91(2‑3): 223‑229.

Gibson, L.; Lynam, A.J.; Bradshaw, C.J.A.; He, F.; Bickford, D.P.; Woodruff, D.S.; Bumrungsri, S. & Laurance, W.F. 2013. Near-Complete Extinction of Native Small Mammal Fauna 25 Years After Forest Fragmentation. Science, 341(6153): 1508‑1510.

Google Earth. 2016. Joaçaba (27°10’41.0”S, 51°30’17.0”W). Available at: Access in: 28/10/2017.

Haddad, N.M.; Brudvig, L.A.; Clobert, J.; Davies, K.F.; Gonzalez, A.; Holt, R.D.; Lovejoy, T.E.; Sexton, J.O.; Austin, M.P.; Collins, C.D.; Cook, W.M.; Damschen, E.I.; Ewers, R.M.; Foster, B.L.; Jenkins, C.N.; King. A.J.; Faurance, W.F.; Levey, D.J.; Margules, C.R.; Melbourne, B.A.; Nicholls, A.O.; Orrock, J.L.; Song, D.‑X. & Townshend, J.R. 2015. Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Science Advances, 1(2): e1500052.

Hamer, K.C.; Hill, J.K.; Benedick, S.; Mustaffa, N.; Chey, V.K. & Maryati, M. 2006. Diversity and ecology of carrion- and fruit-feeding butterflies in Bornean rain forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 22(01): 25‑33.

Hill, J.; Hamer, K.; Tangah, J. & Dawood, M. 2001. Ecology of tropical butterflies in rainforest gaps. Oecologia, 128(2): 294‑302.

Hsieh, T.C.; Ma, K.H. & Chao, A. 2016. iNEXT: An R package for rarefaction and extrapolation of species diversity (Hill numbers). Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(12): 1451‑1456.

Ibáñez, I.; Katz, D.S.W.; Peltier, D.; Wolf, S.M. & Connor Barrie, B.T. 2014. Assessing the integrated effects of landscape fragmentation on plants and plant communities: The challenge of multiprocess-multiresponse dynamics. Journal of Ecology, 102(4): 882‑895.

Iserhard, C.A.; Duarte, L.; Seraphim, N. & Freitas, A.V.L. 2018. How urbanization affects multiple dimensions of biodiversity in tropical butterfly assemblages. Biodiversity and Conservation, 28(3): 621‑638.

Jokimäki, J.; Huhta, E.; Itämies, J. & Rahko, P. 1998. Distribution of arthropods in relation to forest patch size, edge, and stand characteristics. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 28(7): 1068‑1072.

Justino, C.E.L.; dos Santos, E.F. & Noll, F.B. 2016. Diversity of Tiphiidae (Insecta: Hymenoptera) in the fragmented Brazilian semi-deciduous Atlantic Forest. Journal of Insect Conservation, 20(3): 417‑431.

Landis, D.A.; Wratten, S.D. & Gurr, G.M. 2000. Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture. Annual Review of Entomology, 45(1): 175‑201.

Lawson, C.R.; Bennie, J.; Hodgson, J.A.; Thomas, C.D. & Wilson, R.J. 2014. Topographic microclimates drive microhabitat associations at the range margin of a butterfly. Ecography, 37(8): 732‑740.

Maté, C.; Micheleti, T. & Santiago, A.G. 2015. Cidades de pequeno porte em Santa Catarina: Uma reflexão sobre planejamento territorial. Revista Políticas Públicas & Cidades, 3(2): 28‑47.

Melo, A.S. & Hepp, L.U. 2008. Ferramentas estatísticas para análises de dados provenientes de biomonitoramento. Oecologia brasiliensis, 12(3): 463‑486.

Öckinger, E.; Lindborg, R.; Sjödin, N.E. & Bommarco, R. 2012. Landscape matrix modifies richness of plants and insects in grassland fragments. Ecography, 35(3): 259‑267.

Oksanen, J.; Blanchet, F.G.; Friendly, M.; Kindt, R.; Legendre, P.; McGlinn, D.; Minchin, P.R.; O’Hara, R.B.; Simpson, G.L.; Solymos, P.; Stevens, M.H.H.; Szoecs, E.; Wagner, H. 2017. Vegan: community ecology package, R package version 2.4‑3.

Poggio, S.L.; Chaneton, E.J. & Ghersa, C.M. 2010. Landscape complexity differentially affects alpha, beta, and gamma diversities of plants occurring in fencerows and crop fields. Biological Conservation, 143(11): 2477‑2486.

Prieto, C. & Dahners, H.D. 2006. Eumaeini (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) del cerro San Antonio: Dinámica de la riqueza y comportamiento de “Hilltopping”. Revista Colombiana de Entomología, 32(2): 179‑190.

Prugh, L.R.; Hodges, K.E.; Sinclair, A.R.E. & Brashares, J.S. 2008. Effect of habitat area and isolation on fragmented animal populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(52): 20770‑20775.

R Core Team. 2015. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: Access in: 27/08/2017.

Ramírez, N. 2004. Ecology of pollination in a tropical Venezuelan savanna. Plant Ecology, 173(2): 171‑189.

Ribeiro, D.B.; Batista, R.; Prado, P.I.; Brown, K.S. & Freitas, A.V.L. 2012. The importance of small scales to the fruit-feeding butterfly assemblages in a fragmented landscape. Biodiversity and Conservation, 21(3): 811‑827.

Ribeiro, D.B.; Prado, P.I.; Brown Jr., K.S. & Freitas, A.V.L. 2008. Additive partitioning of butterfly diversity in a fragmented landscape: Importance of scale and implications for conservation. Diversity and Distributions, 14(6): 961‑968.

Rigueira, D.M.G.; Molinari, A.L.M.; Mariano, D.L.S.; Reis, R.M.; Portugal, A.B.; Santana, N.S. & Santos, R.A. 2012. Influência da distância da borda e do adensamento foliar sobre a abundância de plantas pioneiras em um fragmento de floresta tropical submontana na Estação Ecológica de Wenceslau Guimarães (Bahia, Brasil). Acta Botanica Brasilica, 26(1): 197‑202.

Roberts, D.W. 2016. Package ‘labdsv’. Available at: Access in: 28/09/2017.

Robinson, N.; Kadlec, T.; Bowers, M.D. & Guralnick, R.P. 2014. Integrating species traits and habitat characteristics into models of butterfly diversity in a fragmented ecosystem. Ecological Modelling, 281: 15‑25.

Rutowski, R.L. 1991. The evolution of male mate-locating behavior in butterflies. The American Naturalist, 138(5): 1121‑1139.

Sancha, N.U. de la, Higgins, C.L.; Presley, S.J. & Strauss, R.E. 2014. Metacommunity structure in a highly fragmented forest: Has deforestation in the Atlantic Forest altered historic biogeographic patterns? Diversity and Distributions, 20(9): 1058‑1070.

Shuey, J.A.; Labus, P.; Carneiro, E.V.; Dias, F.M.S.; Leite, L.A.R. & Mielke, O.H.H. 2017. Butterfly communities respond to structural changes in forest restorations and regeneration in lowland Atlantic Forest, Paraná, Brazil. Journal of Insect Conservation, 21(3): 545‑557.

Silberbauer-Gottsberger, I. & Gottsberger, G. 1988. A polinização de plantas do cerrado. Revista Brasileira de Biologia, 48(4): 651‑663.

Steffan-Dewenter, I. 2003. Importance of habitat area and landscape context for species richness of bees and wasps in fragmented orchard meadows. Conservation Biology, 17(4): 1036‑1044.

Summerville, K.S.; Veech, J.A. & Crist, T.O. 2002. Does variation in patch use among butterfly species contribute to nestedness at fine spatial scales? Oikos, 97(2): 195‑204.

Tews, J.; Brose, U.; Grimm, V.; Tielbörger, K.; Wichmann, M.C.; Schwager, M. & Jeltsch, F. 2004. Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: The importance of keystone structures: Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity. Journal of Biogeography, 31(1): 79‑92.

Trivellini, G.; Polidori, C.; Pasquaretta, C.; Orsenigo, S. & Bogliani, G. 2016. Nestedness of habitat specialists within habitat generalists in a butterfly assemblage. Insect Conservation and Diversity, 9(6): 495‑505.

Truxa, C. & Fiedler, K. 2012. Down in the flood? How moth communities are shaped in temperate floodplain forests: Floodplain forest moths. Insect Conservation and Diversity, 5(5): 389‑397.

Uehara-Prado, M. & Freitas, A.V.L. 2009. The effect of rainforest fragmentation on species diversity and mimicry ring composition of ithomiine butterflies. Insect Conservation and Diversity, 2(1): 23‑28.

Uehara-Prado, M.; Brown, K.S. & Freitas, A.V.L. 2007. Species richness, composition and abundance of fruit-feeding butterflies in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest: Comparison between a fragmented and a continuous landscape. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 16(1): 43‑54.

Uehara-Prado, M.; Fernandes, J. de O.; Bello, A. de M.; Machado, G.; Santos, A.J.; Vaz-de-Mello, F.Z. & Freitas, A.V.L. 2009. Selecting terrestrial arthropods as indicators of small-scale disturbance: A first approach in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biological Conservation, 142(6): 1220‑1228.

Verbeylen, G.; De Bruyn, L.; Adriaensen, F. & Matthysen, E. 2003. Does matrix resistance influence Red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris L. 1758) distribution in an urban landscape? Landscape Ecology, 18(8): 791‑805.

Vibrans, A.C.; Sevegnani, L.; Gasper, A.L. de & Lingner, D.V. 2012. Inventário florístico florestal de Santa Catarina. Vol. 2: Floresta estacional decidual. Blumenau, Universidade Regional de Blumenau.

Vieira, M.V.; Olifiers, N.; Delciellos, A.C.; Antunes, V.Z.; Bernardo, L.R.; Grelle, C.E.V. & Cerqueira, R. 2009. Land use vs. Fragment size and isolation as determinants of small mammal composition and richness in Atlantic Forest remnants. Biological Conservation, 142(6): 1191‑1200.

Warren, A.D.; Davis, K.J.; Grishin, N.V.; Pelham, J.P. & Stangeland, E.M. 2013. Butterflies of America. Illustrated Lists of American Butterflies.

Zacca, T.; Paluch, M.; Siewert, R.; Freitas, A.; Barbosa, E.; Mielke, O.H.H. & Casagrande, M.M. 2017. Revision of Godartiana Forster (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae), with the description of a new species from northeastern Brazil. Austral Entomology, 56: 169‑190.

How to Cite
Orlandin, E., Piovesan, M., D’Agostini, F., & Carneiro, E. (2019). Use of microhabitats affects butterfly assemblages in a rural landscape. Papéis Avulsos De Zoologia, 59, e20195949.
Original Article