Bird-plant interaction networks in native forests and eucalyptus plantations within a protected area

Authors

  • Cristian Daniel Veliz Baldiviezo Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP), Instituto de Ciências Exatas e Biológicas (ICEB), Departamento de Biodiversidade, Evolução e Meio Ambiente (DEBIO), Laboratório de Zoologia dos Vertebrados. Ouro Preto, MG, Brasil. Author http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5883-097X
  • Marcela Fortes de Oliveira Passos Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP), Instituto de Ciências Exatas e Biológicas (ICEB), Departamento de Biodiversidade, Evolução e Meio Ambiente (DEBIO), Laboratório de Zoologia dos Vertebrados. Ouro Preto, MG, Brasil. Author http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0992-5515
  • Cristiano Schetini de Azevedo Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP), Instituto de Ciências Exatas e Biológicas (ICEB), Departamento de Biodiversidade, Evolução e Meio Ambiente (DEBIO), Laboratório de Zoologia dos Vertebrados. Ouro Preto, MG, Brasil. Author http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0256-9017

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/1807-0205/2021.61.91

Keywords:

Bird-plant interactions, Exotic species, Frugivory, Zoochory

Abstract

Frugivory is a plant-animal mutualistic interaction carried out mostly by birds. It consists in the bird consumption of fruits with later dispersion of the plants' seeds, helping in the vegetation regeneration. Frugivory can be affected by the habitat fragmentation and introduction of exotic species, which may alter the species interaction by extinction or competitor introduction. This study aimed to compare the structure of the network of frugivorous interactions between birds and plants in native forest and eucalyptus plantation. Birds were captured by mist nets and had their feces collected. Later, the seeds were identified in laboratory. The records of fruit consumption by birds in the zoochoric plant species present in the study area were also conducted. The data collected was used to build a network of interactions and identify the most important network metrics, species, and ecological functional groups in the studied environments. The results showed that the species composition, the connectivity of the relationships, the importance of the species for the interaction networks and the number of subgroups within the networks were highly similar between the native forest and the eucalyptus plantation. This could be explained by the favorable conditions that the studied eucalyptus plantations presented, such as the lack of anthropogenic activities, well-developed understory, and the presence of native surrounding vegetation, allowing practically the same seed dispersal capacity in both types of environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Cristiano Schetini de Azevedo, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP), Instituto de Ciências Exatas e Biológicas (ICEB), Departamento de Biodiversidade, Evolução e Meio Ambiente (DEBIO), Laboratório de Zoologia dos Vertebrados. Ouro Preto, MG, Brasil.

    Department of Zoology

References

Altieri, M.A. 2009. The ecological impacts of large-scale agrofuel monoculture production systems in the Americas. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 29: 236-244. http://doi.org/10.1177/0270467609333728

Amico, G. & Aizen, M. 2005. Seed dispersal by birds in a temperate forest of southern South America: Who disperses whom? Ecología Austral, 15: 89-100.

Andrade, M. 1998. O Parque Estadual do Itacolomi e suas aves. Uiraçu, 2(2): 4.

Athie, S. & Dias, M. 2012. Frugivory by birds in a mosaico of seasonal semideciduous forest and mixed reforestation in Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil. Acta Botanica Brasilica, 26(1): 84-93.

Avila, G.; Gomes, A.; Canary, A. & Bugoni, L. 2010. The role of avian frugivores on germination and potential seed dispersal of the Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolius. Biota Neotropica, 10(3): 45-51. http://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/v10n3/en/abstract?article+bn00910032010.

Barlow, J.; Gardner, T.; Araujo, I.; Avila-Pires, T.; Bonaldo, A.; Costa, J.; Esposito, M.; Ferreira, L.; Hawes, J.; Hernandez, M.; Leite, R.; Lo-Man-Hung, N.; Malcolm, J.; Martins, M.; Mestre, L.; Nunes-Gutjahr, A.; Overal, W.; Parry, L.; Peters, S.; Ribeiro-Jr., M.; Da Silva Motta, C. & Da Silva, M. 2007. Quantifying the biodiversity value of tropical primary, secondary, and plantation forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 104(47): 18555-18560.

Bascompte, J. & Jordano, J. 2007. Plant-Animal mutualistic networks: The architecture of biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 38: 567-593.

Bascompte, J. & Jordano, P. 2014. Mutualistic networks. Princeton, Princeton University Press.

Batagelj, V. & Mrvar, A. 1998. Pajek – a program for large network analysis. Available: http://vlado.fmf.unilj.si/pub/networks/pajek. Access: 15/11/2019.

Bayle, G.K. 2019. Eological and social impacts of eucalyptus tree plantation on the environment. Journal of Biodiversity Conservation and Bioresource Management, 5: 93-104. http://doi.org/10.3329/jbcbm.v5i1.42189

Benton, T.G.; Bieg, C.; Harwatt, H.; Pudasaini, R. & Wellesley, L. 2021. Food system impacts on biodiversity loss. London, Chatham House.

Birdlife International. 2016. Swallow-tailed Cotinga Phibalura flavirostris. Available: http://www.birdlife.org. Access: 11/03/2020.

Borsboom, A.; Wang, J.; Lees, N.; Mathieson, M. & Hogan, L. 2002. Measurement and integration of fauna biodiversity values in Queensland agroforestry system. Canberra, Joint Venture Agroforestry Program. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, 2: 44.

Bremer, L. & Farley, L. 2010. Does plantation forestry restore biodiversity or create green deserts? A synthesis of effects of land-use transitions on plant species richness. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19(14): 3893-3915.

Brockerhoff, E.; Jactel, H.; Parrotta, J. & Ferraz, S. 2013. Role of eucalypt and other planted forests in biodiversity conservation and the provision of biodiversity-related ecosystem services. Forest Ecology and Management, 301: 43-50.

Brockerhoff, E.; Jactel, H.; Parrotta, J.; Quine, C. & Sayer, J. 2008. Plantation forests and biodiversity: Oxymorom or opportunity? Biodiversity and Conservation, 17: 925-951.

Carnus, J.; Parrotta, J.; Brockerhoff, E.; Arbez, M.; Jactel, H.; Kremer, A.; Lamb, D.; O'hara, K. & Walters, B. 2006. Planted forests and biodiversity. Journal of Forestry, 104(2): 65-77.

Caziani, S. 1996. Plant-seed dispersal bird interaction in a semi-arid Chaco forest. (Doctoral thesis). Facultad de ciencias exactas y naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires. Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Ceccon, E. 2001. Un paraíso casi perdido: breve historia de la deforestación en Brasil. Ciência, México, DF, 64: 22-29.

Costa, F.; Ribeiro, M.; Bronstein, J.; Guerra, T.; Muylaert, R.; Leite, A. & Neves, F. 2016. Few ant species play a central role linking different plant resources in a network in rupestrian grasslands. Plos One, 11(2): e0167161. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167161

Cullen, L.; Rudran, R. & Valladares-Padua, C. 2006. Métodos de estudo em biologia da conservação e manejo da vida silvestre. 2.ed. Curitiba, UFPR.

Edwards, F.A.; Edwards, D.P.; Sloan, S. & Hamer, K.C. 2014. Sustainable management in crop monocultures: the impact of retaining forest on oil palm yield. Plos One, 9(3): e91695. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091695

Fadini, R. & De Marco, P. 2004. Interactions between frugivorous birds and plants in Atlantic Forest fragment in Minas Gerais. Ararajuba, 12(2): 97-103.

Fleming, T. & Kress, W. 2011. A brief history of fruits and frugivores. Acta Oecologica, 37(6): 521-530.

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 2016. The state of the world's forests: Forests and agriculture, challenges and opportunities in relation to land use. Roma, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Frigieri, F.; Iwanicki, N.; Gandara, F.; Ferraz, E.; Romão, G.; Coletti, G.; Souza, V. & Moreno, M. 2016. Guia de plântulas e sementes da Mata Atlantica do Estado de São Paulo. Piracicaba, IPEF. 99p.

Galindo, J.; Guevara, S. & Sosa, V. 2000. Bat and bird generated seed rains at isolated tree in pastures in a tropical rain forest. Conservation Biology, 14(6): 1693-1703.

Governo do Estado de Minas Gerais, Secretaria de Estado de Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento Sustentável (SEMAD), Instituto Estadual de Florestas de Minas Gerais (IEF), Projeto de Proteção da Mata Atlântica em Minas Gerais (PROMATA). 2007. Management plan for the Itacolomi State Park: Chapter 1 – Park Diagnostic. Belo Horizonte.

Hernández-Ladrón de Guevara, I.; Rojas-Soto, O.; López-Barrera, F.; Puebla-Olivares, F. & Díaz-Castelazo, C. 2012. Seed dispersal by birds in a mesophilic forest landscape in central Veracruz, México: Your role in passive restoration. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 85: 89-100.

Hobbs, R.; Catling, P.; Wombey, J.; Clayton, M.; Atkins, L. & Reid, A. 2003. Faunal use of bluegum (Eucalyptus globulus) plantations in southwestern, Australia. Agroforestry Systems, 58: 195-212.

Kanowski, J.; Catterall, C. & Wardelljohnson, G. 2005. Consequences of broadscale timber plantations for biodiversity in cleared rainforest landscapes of tropical and subtropical Australia. Forest Ecology and Management, 208(1-3): 359-372.

Kuhlmann, M. 2012. Fruits and seed of Cerrado attractive to fauna: Field guide. Editora Rede de Sementes do Cerrado.

León, E. 2010. Seed rain by birds and bats to pastures associated with a fragment of tropical dry forest (Córdoba – Colombia). (Graduation Monography). Bogotá, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.

Lopes, L.; Fernandes, A. & Marini, M. 2005. Diet of some Atlantic Forest birds. Ararajuba, 13(1): 95-103.

Machado, R. & Lamas, I. 1996. Birdlife associated with eucalyptus reforestation in the municipality of Antônio Dias, Minas Gerais. Ararajuba, 4(1): 15-22.

Manhaes, M.; Loures-Ribeiro, A. & Dias, M. 2010. Diet of understory birds in two Atlantic Forest areas of southeast Brazil. Journal of Natural History, 44(7): 469-489.

Markl, J.; Schleuning, M.; Forget, P.; Jordano, P.; Lambert, J.; Traveset, A.; Wright, S. & Bohning-Gaese, K. 2012. Meta-Analysis of the effects of human disturbance on seed dispersal by animals. Conservation Biology, 26(6): 1072-1081.

Marsden, S.; Whiffin, M. & Galetti, M. 2001. Bird diversity and abundance in forest fragments and Eucalyptus plantations around an Atlantic Forest reserve, Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation, 10(5): 737-751.

Mello, M.; Muylaert, R.; Pinheiro, R. & Felix, G. 2016. Guide to ecological network analysis. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Marco_Mello/publication/307940803_Guia_para_analise_de_redes_ecologicas/links/5ceb0c31458515712ec5f040/Guia-para-analise-de-redes-ecologicas.pdf. Access: 15/02/2020.

Mello, M.; Rodrigues, F.; Costa, L.; Kissling, W.; Sekercioglu, Ç.; Marquitti, F. & Kalko, E. 2015. Keystone species in seed dispersal networks are mainly determined by dietary specialization. Oikos, 124(8): 1031-1039.

Messias, M.; Sousa, H.; Scalon, V.; Roschel, M.; Candido, E. & Fujaco, M. 2017. Phanerogamic flora and vegetation of Itacolomi State Park, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Biota Neotropica, 17(1): e20160236. http://doi.org/10.1590/1676-0611-BN-2016-0236

Myers, N.; Mittermeier, R.A.; Fonseca, G.A.B. & Kent, J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403(6772): 853-858. http://doi.org/10.1038/35002501

Pereira, H.; Silvéiro, M.; Schetini, C. & Ribon, R. 2015. Wealth and density of birds that nest in cavities in abandoned eucalyptus plantations. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia, 55(5): 81-90.

Pizo, M. & Galetti, M. 2010. Methods and perspectives for the study of frugivory and seed dispersal by birds. In: Von Matter, S.; Straube, F.; Accordi, I.; Piacentini, V. & Candido, J. (Coord.). Ornithology and conservation: Applied science, research techniques and surveys. Rio de Janeiro, Technical Books Editora. p. 491-504.

Purificação, K.; Pascotto, M.; Pedroni, F.; Pereira, J. & Lima, N. 2014. Interactions between frugivorous birds and plants in savannah and forest formations of the Cerrado. Biota Neotropica, 14(4). http://doi.org/10.1590/1676-06032014006814

R Development Team. 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing. Viena.

Rabinovich, J. 1981. Ecologia de poblaciones animales. Editora Continental. México.

Rezende, C.L.; Scarano, F.R.; Assad, E.D.; Joly, C.A.; Metzger, J.P.; Strassburg, B.B.N.; Tabarelli, M.; Fonseca, G.A. & Mittermeier, R.A. 2018. From hotspot to hopespot: An opportunity for the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, 16(4): 208-214. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2018.10.002

Sarmento, R.; Alves-Costa, C.; Ayub, A. & Mello, M. 2014. Partitioning of seed dispersal services between birds and bats in a fragment of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Zoologia, Curitiba, 31(3): 245-255.

Scherer, A.; Maraschin-Silva, F. & Baptista, M. 2007. Patterns of mutualistic interactions between tree species and frugivorous birds in a Restinga community in the state park of Itapuã, RS, Brazil. Acta Botanica Brasilica, 21(1): 203-212.

Schleuning, M.; Ingmann, L.; Strauss, R.; Fritz, S.; Dalsgaard, B.; Dehling, D. & Böhning‐Gaese, K. 2014. Ecological, historical and evolutionary determinants of modularity in weighted seed‐dispersal networks. Ecology Letters, 17(4): 454-463.

Sigrist, T. 2014. Avis Brasilis field guide: Brazilian birdlife. São Paulo, Avis Brasilis.

Silva, W.; De Marco, P.; Hasui, E. & Gomes, V. 2002. Patterns of fruit-frugivore interactions in two Atlantic Forest bird communities of south-eastern Brazil: Implications for conservation. In: Levey, D.; Silva, W. & Galetti, M. Seed dispersal and frugivory: Ecology, evolution and conservation. Oxon, UK, CABI publishing. p. 423-436.

Snow, D. 1981. Tropical frugivorous birds and their food plants: a world survey. Biotropica, 13: 1-14.

Snow, D. 2004. Family Cotingidae (Cotingas). In: Del Hoyo J.; Elliot A. & Christie D. (Eds.). Handbook of the birds of the world: Cotingas to Pipit and Wagtails. London, Lynx Editions. v. 9, p. 32-109.

Somavilla, A.; Sühs, R.B. & Köhler, A. 2010. Entomofauna associated to the floration of Schinus terebinthifolius Raddi (Anacardiaceae) in the Rio Grande do Sul state, Brazil. Bioscience Journal, 26(6): 956-965.

Stallings, J. 1991. The importance of understory on wildlife in Brazilian eucalypt plantation. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 7(3): 267-276.

Sühs, R.B.; Somavilla, A.; Köhler, A. & Putzke, J. 2009. Pollen vector wasps (Hymenoptera, Vespidae) of Schinus terebinthifolius Raddi (Anacardiaceae), Santa Cruz do Sul, RS, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biosciences, Porto Alegre, 7(2): 138-143.

Tafuri, A. 2008. Environmental evaluation of Itacolomi State Park, Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais. (Masters dissertation). Belo Horizonte, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.

Valduga, M.; Zenni, R. & Vitule, J. 2016. Ecological impacts of non-native tree species plantations are broad and heterogeneous: A review of Brazilian research. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 88(3): 1675-1688.

Vidal, M.; Hasui, E.; Pizo, M.; Tamashiro, J.; Silva, W. & Guimarães, P. 2014. Frugivores at higher risk of extinction are the key elements of a mutualistic network. Ecology, 95(12): 3440-3447.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-27

Issue

Section

Original Article

How to Cite

Baldiviezo, C. D. V., Passos, M. F. de O., & Azevedo, C. S. de. (2021). Bird-plant interaction networks in native forests and eucalyptus plantations within a protected area. Papéis Avulsos De Zoologia, 61, e20216191. https://doi.org/10.11606/1807-0205/2021.61.91