Report of an extra-pair copulation in the Rufous Hornero, Furnarius rufus (Aves: Furnariidae)

Authors

  • Pedro Diniz Universidade de Brasília (UNB), Instituto de Ciências Biológicas (ICB), Departamento de Zoologia, Laboratório de Comportamento Animal. Brasília, DF, Brasil; Universidade de Brasília (UNB), Instituto de Ciências Biológicas (ICB), Departamento de Ecologia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia. Brasília, DF, Brasil. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3193-6376
  • Carlos Biagolini-Jr. Universidade de Brasília (UNB), Instituto de Ciências Biológicas (ICB), Departamento de Zoologia, Laboratório de Comportamento Animal. Brasília, DF, Brasil; Universidade de Brasília (UNB), Instituto de Ciências Biológicas (ICB), Departamento de Ecologia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia. Brasília, DF, Brasil. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3699-3337

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/1807-0205/2021.61.67

Keywords:

Infidelity, Social monogamy, Mate guarding, Eavesdropping

Abstract

In the last decade, studies in bird breeding biology have shown that infidelity is prevalent in socially monogamous species. Here, we describe an extra-pair copulation (EPC) event in the Rufous Hornero (Furnarius rufus), a socially monogamous bird with year-round territoriality and low levels of extra-pair paternity. Before the EPC, a within-pair copulation (WPC) occurred inside the pair’s territory. The WPC occurred on the ground and between a banded male (ca. 6 years-old) and an unbanded female. Ten minutes later this breeding pair invaded a neighboring territory, presumably to forage. The territorial male was chased back to its territory by an unbanded male neighbor after being detected. The male neighbor was paired with an unbanded female that did not participate in the aggressive interaction. When flying back to its territory the male neighbor copulated with the territorial female on the ground (ie. EPC). The territorial male flew, vocalized, and perched above the male neighbor, interrupting the EPC. The aggressive interaction then ceased as each pair resumed foraging in their respective territories. These observations suggest that Rufous Horneros can use EPC to obtain immediate benefits (food access in a neighbor’s territory). Moreover, WPC may be detected by neighbors and physical mate guarding and/or frequent WPC may be necessary to prevent EPC in the Rufous Hornero.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ball, A.D.; van Dijk, R.E.; Lloyd, P.; Pogány, Á.; Dawson, D.A.; Dorus, S.; Bowie, R.C.K.K.; Burke, T. & Székely, T. 2017. Levels of extra-pair paternity are associated with parental care in penduline tits (Remizidae). Ibis, 159(2): 449-455. http://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12446

Biagolini-Jr., C.; Westneat, D.F. & Francisco, M.R. 2017. Does habitat structural complexity influence the frequency of extra-pair paternity in birds? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 71(7): 101. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2329-x

Boucherie, P.H.; Poulin, N. & Dufour, V. 2018. Not much ado about something: behavioural mechanisms of pair bond separation and formation in long-term pairing rooks. Écoscience, 25: 71-83. http://doi.org/10.1080/11956860.2017.1414671

Brouwer, L. & Griffith, S.C. 2019. Extra‐pair paternity in birds. Molecular Ecology, 28(22): 4864-4882. http://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15259

Brylawski, A.M.Z. & Whittingham, L.A. 2004. An experimental study of mate guarding and paternity in house wrens. Animal Behaviour, 68(6): 1417-1424. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.02.016

Bukacińska, M.; Bukaciński, D.; Epplen, J.T.; Sauer, K.P. & Lubjuhn, T. 1998. Low frequency of extra-pair paternity in Common Gulls (Larus canus) as revealed by DNA fingerprinting. Journal of Ornithology, 139(4): 413-420. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF01653468

Culina, A.; Radersma, R. & Sheldon, B.C. 2015. Trading up: The fitness consequences of divorce in monogamous birds. Biolological Reviews, 90(4): 1015-1034. http://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12143

Dial, K.P. 2003. Evolution of avian locomotion: correlates of flight style, locomotor modules, nesting biology, body size, development, and the origin of flapping flight. The Auk, 120(4): 941-952. http://doi.org/10.1642/0004-8038(2003)120%5b0941:EOALCO%5d2.0.CO;2

Diniz, P.; Macedo, R.H. & Webster, M.S. 2019. Duetting correlates with territory quality and reproductive success in a suboscine bird with low extra-pair paternity. The Auk, 136: 1-13. http://doi.org/10.1093/auk/uky004

Diniz, P.; Ribeiro, P.H.L; Rech, G.S. & Macedo, R.H. 2016. Monochromatism, cryptic sexual dimorphism and lack of assortative mating in the Rufous Hornero, Furnarius rufus albogularis. Emu, 116(3): 294-300. http://doi.org/10.1071/MU15118

Diniz, P.; Silva-Jr., E.F.; Webster, M.S. & Macedo, R.H. 2018. Duetting behavior in a Neotropical ovenbird: sexual and seasonal variation and adaptive signaling functions. Journal of Avian Biology, 49(4): jav-01637. http://doi.org/10.1111/jav.01637

Dowling, J. & Webster, M.S. 2018. Acoustic and physical mate guarding have different effects on intruder behaviour in a duetting songbird. Animal Behaviour, 135: 69-75. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.11.011

Ewen, J.G. & Armstrong, D.P. 2000. Male provisioning is negatively correlated with attempted extrapair copulation frequency in the stitchbird (or hihi). Animal Behaviour, 60(4): 429-433. http://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1485

Figueiredo, N.S. 2011. Wiki Aves – A Enciclopédia das Aves do Brasil. Available: http://www.wikiaves.com/486091. Access: 06/04/2021.

Fraga, R.M. 1980. The Breeding of Rufous Horneros (Furnarius rufus). The Condor, 82: 58-68. http://doi.org/10.2307/1366785

Freitas, J.A. 2013. Wiki Aves – A Enciclopédia das Aves do Brasil. Available: http://www.wikiaves.com/1066264. Access: 06/04/2021.

Gilbert, L.; Burke, T. & Krupa, A. 1998. No evidence for extra‐pair paternity in the western gull. Molecular Ecology, 7(11): 1549-1552. http://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00488.x

Gill, L.F.; Van Schaik, J.; Von Bayern, A.M.P. & Gahr, M.L. 2020. Genetic monogamy despite frequent extrapair copulations in “strictly monogamous” wild jackdaws. Behavioral Ecology, 31(1): 247-260. http://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arz185

Griffith, S.C.; Owens, I.P.F & Thuman, K.A. 2002. Extra pair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific variation and adaptive function. Molecular Ecology, 11(11): 2195-2212. http://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2002.01613.x

Hall, M. & Peters, A. 2009. Do male paternity guards ensure female fidelity in a duetting fairy-wren? Behavioral Ecology, 20(1): 222-228. http://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arn139

Harts, A.M.F.; Booksmythe, I. & Jennions, M.D. 2016. Mate guarding and frequent copulation in birds: A meta-analysis of their relationship to paternity and male phenotype. Evolution, 70(12): 2789-2808. http://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13081

Hoi, H.; Krištofík, J. & Darolová, A. 2013. Experimentally simulating paternity uncertainty: immediate and long-term responses of male and female reed warblers Acrocephalus scirpaceus. PLoS One, 8: e62541. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062541

Johnsen, A.; Pärn, H.; Fossøy, F.; Kleven, O.; Laskemoen, T. & Lifjeld, J.T. 2008. Is female promiscuity constrained by the presence of her social mate? An experiment with bluethroats Luscinia svecica. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 62(11): 1761-1767. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-008-0604-6

Kempenaers, B. & Schlicht, E. 2010. Extra-pair behaviour. In: Kappeler, P. Animal Behaviour: Evolution and Mechanisms. Berlin, Springer. p. 359-411.

Low, M. 2006. The energetic cost of mate guarding is correlated with territorial intrusions in the New Zealand stitchbird. Behavioral Ecology, 17(2): 270-276. http://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arj025

Massoni, V.; Reboreda, J.C.; López, G.C. & Aldatz, M.F. 2012. High coordination and equitable parental effort in the Rufous Hornero. The Condor, 114(3): 564-570. http://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2012.110135

Matysioková, B. & Remeš, V. 2013. Faithful females receive more help: The extent of male parental care during incubation in relation to extra-pair paternity in songbirds. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 26: 155-162. http://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12039

Mays, H.L. & Ritchison, G. 2004. The effect of vegetation density on male mate guarding and extra-territorial forays in the yellow-breasted chat (Icteria virens). Naturwissenschaften, 91(4): 195-198. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-004-0510-3

Mee, A.; Whitfield, D.P.; Thompson, D.B.A. & Burke, T. 2004. Extrapair paternity in the common sandpiper, Actitis hypoleucos, revealed by DNA fingerprinting. Animal Behaviour, 67(2): 333-342. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.02.007

Meek, S.B. & Robertson, R.J. 1994. Interspecific competition for nestboxes affects mate guarding in eastern bluebirds, Sialia sialis. Animal Behaviour, 47(2): 295-302. http://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1994.1042

Muck, C.; Kempenaers, B.; Kuhn, S.; Valcu, M. & Goymann, W. 2009. Paternity in the classical polyandrous black coucal (Centropus grillii) – a cuckoo accepting cuckoldry? Behavioral Ecology, 20(6): 1185-1193. http://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arp118

Osorio-Beristain, M. & Drummond, H. 1998. Non-aggressive mate guarding by the blue-footed booby: a balance of female and male control. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 43(4-5): 307-315. http://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050496

Paula, L.A. 2014. Wiki Aves – A Enciclopédia das Aves do Brasil. Available: http://www.wikiaves.com/3537244. Access: 06/04/2021.

Petrie, M. & Kempenaers, B. 1998. Extra-pair paternity in birds: explaining variation between species and populations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 13: 52-58. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01232-9

Reding, L. 2015. Increased hatching success as a direct benefit of polyandry in birds. Evolution, 69: 264-270. http://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12553

Remsen-Jr., J.V. & Bonan, A. 2020. Rufous Hornero (Furnarius rufus), version 1.0. In: del Hoyo, J.; Elliott, A.; Sargatal, J.; Christie, D.A. & de Juana, E. Birds of the world. Ithaca, Cornell Lab of Ornithology.

Samia, D.S.M.; Nakagawa, S.; Nomura, F.; Rangel, T.F. & Blumstein, D.T. 2015. Increased tolerance to humans among disturbed wildlife. Nature Communications, 6 (8877): 1-8. http://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9877

Schamel, D.; Tracy, D.M.; Lank, D.B. & Westneat, D.F. 2004. Mate guarding, copulation strategies and paternity in the sex-role reversed, socially polyandrous red-necked phalarope Phalaropus lobatus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 57(2): 110-118. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-004-0825-2

Sheldon, B.C. 1994. Male phenotype, fertility, and the pursuit of extra-pair copulations by female birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 257: 25-30. http://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1994.0089

Sherman, P.W. & Morton, M.L. 1988. Extra-pair fertilizations in mountain white-crowned sparrows. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 22(6): 413-420. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF00294979

Valera, F.; Hoi, H. & Krištín, A. 2003. Male shrikes punish unfaithful females. Behavioral Ecology, 14(3): 403-408. http://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/14.3.403

Velando, A. 2004. Female control in yellow-legged gulls: trading paternity assurance for food. Animal Behaviour, 67(5): 899-907. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.08.019

Westneat, D.F. & Sherman, P.W. 1997. Density and extra-pair fertilizations in birds: A comparative analysis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 41(4): 205-215. http://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050381

Westneat, D.F. & Stewart, I.R.K. 2003. Extra pair paternity in birds: causes, correlates, and conflict. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 34: 365-396. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132439

Westneat, D.F.; Schofield, M.; Wright, J. 2013. Parental behavior exhibits among-individual variance, plasticity, and heterogeneous residual variance. Behavioral Ecology, 24(3): 598-604. http://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ars207

Downloads

Published

2021-07-30

Issue

Section

Original Article

How to Cite

Diniz, P., & Biagolini-Jr., C. (2021). Report of an extra-pair copulation in the Rufous Hornero, Furnarius rufus (Aves: Furnariidae). Papéis Avulsos De Zoologia, 61, e20216167. https://doi.org/10.11606/1807-0205/2021.61.67

Funding data