Digital information product development: lessons from a small-sized German enterprise
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-03-2020-0033Palavras-chave:
New product development process, Digital products, Digital information products, Capabilities, Critical success factors, Competitive advantageResumo
Purpose – This case study examines the new product development (NPD) process of digital information
products (DIPs) and its critical success factors (CSFs) in a small-sized German enterprise.
Design/methodology/approach – A case study was conducted with a small firm focused on the
development of DIPs; data were obtained through semi-structured interviews, direct observation and
document analysis.
Findings – The firm uses an informal and cross-functional NPD process (idea generation, idea validation,
product creation and product launch) in converting an idea into a sellable product. Peculiar aspects of each
stage within the process as well as ten CSFs to NPD projects were verified.
Research limitations/implications – Limitations are attributed to its qualitative nature, which does
not allow generalizations, though careful attention was given to validity and reliability issues through the use
of data source triangulation.
Practical implications – The paper provides a conceptual process that may benefit further initiatives for
developing and launching DIPs, as well as a comprehensive list of CSFs for such projects.
Originality/value – This paper is the first one to schematize the NPD process and practices for DIPs, as
well as key capabilities. It contributes to the NPD literature in discussing dynamic aspects that are typical to
the firm analyzed and to others operating in a digital context. At the same time, it reinforces other traditional
aspects that have become overlooked in digital business debates.
Downloads
Referências
Cerchione, R., Esposito, E., & Spadaro, M.R. (2016). A literature review on knowledge management in
SMEs. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 14(2), 169–177.
Cision PR Newswire (2020). Corporate e-learning market size is projected to grow at a CAGR of 9.16% by
Available at: www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/corporate-e-learning-market-size-isprojected-to-grow-at-a-cagr-of-9-16-by-2025–valuates-reports-301122047.html.
Cooper, R.G. (1999). The invisible success factors in product innovation. Journal of Product Innovation
Management, 16(2), 115–133.
Cooper, R.G. (2001). Winning at new products: Accelerating the process from idea to launch. Cambridge,
Massachusetts, MA: Perseus Books.
Cooper, R.G., & Kleinschmidt, E.J. (2007). Winning businesses in product development: The critical
success factors. Research-Technology Management, 50(3), 52–66.
Crawford, C.M., & Di Benedetto, C.A. (2002). New product management. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Davenport, T.H., & Kudyba, S. (2016). Designing and developing analytics-based data products. MIT
Sloan Management Review, 58(1), 83–89.
De Waal, G.A., & Knott, P. (2019). NPD tools, thoroughness and performance in small firms.
International Journal of Innovation Management, 23(6), 1–26.
Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Jackson, P.R. (2015). Management and business research. Thousand
Oaks, California, CA: Sage.
Gibson, C.B. (2017). Elaboration, generalization, triangulation, and interpretation: On enhancing the
value of mixed method research. Organizational Research Methods, 20, 193–223.
Guimarães, T., Paranjape, K., & Walton, M. (2019). An expanded model of success factors for NPD
performance. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 16(7), 1–29.
Hanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D., & Marante, C.A. (2021). A systematic review of the literature on
digital transformation: insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. Journal
of Management Studies, 58(5), 1159–1197.
Healy, B., O’Dwyer, M., & Ledwith, A. (2018). An exploration of product advantage and its antecedents
in SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 25(1), 129–146.
Holahan, P.J., Markham, S.K., & Sullivan, Z.Z. (2014). Product development as core competence: How
formal product development practices differ for radical, more innovative, and incremental
product innovations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 329–345.
Keränen, J., & Prior, D.D. (2019). Opportunities for ethnographic methodologies in B2B service research.
Journal of Services Marketing, 34(1), 78–86.
Kim, M., Kim, J.E., Sawng, Y.W., & Lim, K.S. (2018). Impacts of innovation type SME’s R&D capability
on patent and new product development. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and
Entrepreneurship, 12(1), 45–61.
Koiso-kanttila, N. (2004). Digital content marketing: A literature synthesis. Journal of Marketing
Management, 20(1–2), 45–65.
Kyriakopoulos, K., & De Ruyter, K. (2004). Knowledge stocks and information flows in new product
development. Journal of Management Studies, 41(8), 1469–1498.
Liu, Z., Li, M., & Kou, J. (2015). Selling information products: Sale channel selection and versioning
strategy with network externality. International Journal of Production Economics, 166, 1–10.
Lopes, A.B., & Galletta, D. (2002). Information value in electronic networks: the case of subscriptionbased online information goods [Paper presentation]. The Academy of Management 2002
Meeting, Denver, CO.
Maidique, M.O., & Zirger, B.J. (1984). A study of success and failure in product innovation: The case of
the US electronics industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 31(4), 192–203.
Mas, J.M., & Gomez, A. (2021). Social partners in the digital ecosystem: Will business organizations,
trade unions and government organizations survive the digital revolution?. Technological
Forecast and Social Change, 162(c), 1–17.
Meyer, M.H., & Zack, M.H. (1996). The design and development of information products. Sloan
Management Review, 37(3), 43–59.
Montoya-Weiss, M., & Calantone, R. (1994). Determinants of new product performance: A review and
meta-analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11(5), 397–417.
Mosey, S. (2005). Understanding new-to-market product development in SMEs. International Journal of
Operations and Production Management, 25(2), 114–130.
Nicholas, J., Ledwith, A., & Perks, H. (2011). New product development best practice in SME and
large organisations: Theory vs practice. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(2),
–251.
O’Dwyer, M., & Gilmore, A. (2017). Competitor orientation in successful SMEs: An exploration of the
impact on innovation. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 27(1), 21–37.
Owens, J.D. (2007). Why do some UK SMEs still find the implementation of a new product development
process problematical?. Management Decision, 45(2), 235–251.
Pullen, A., Weerd-Nederhof, P.D., Groen, A., Song, M., & Fisscher, O. (2009). Successful patterns of
internal SME characteristics leading to high overall innovation performance. Creativity and
Innovation Management, 18(3), 209–223.
Raghunathan, S., & Sarkar, S. (2016). Competitive bundling in information markets: A seller-side
analysis. MIS Quarterly, 40(1), 111–132.
Raymond, L., Uwizeyemungu, S., Fabi, B., & St-Pierre, J. (2018). IT capabilities for product innovation
in SMEs: a configurational approach. Information Technology and Management, 19(1), 75–87.
Rowley, J.E. (2016). Information marketing. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Saarikko, T., Westergren, W.H., & Blomquist, T. (2020). Digital transformation: Five recommendations
for the digitally conscious firm. Business Horizons, 63(6), 825–839.
Santos-Vijande, M.L., Lopez-Sanchez, J.A., & Rudd, J. (2016). Frontline employees’ collaboration in
industrial service innovation: routes of co-creation’s effects on new service performance. Journal
of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(3), 350–375.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2016). Research methods for business students. Edinburgh:
Pearson.
Sonta-Dr ączkowska, E., & Mrozewski, M. (2019). Exploring the role of project management in product _
development of new technology-based firms. Project Management Journal, 51(2), 294–311.
Strader, T.J., & Shaw, M.J. (1999). Consumer cost differences for traditional and internet markets.
Internet Research, 9(2), 82–92.
Takeuchi, H., & Nonaka, I. (1996). The new product development game. Harvard Business Review,
(1), 137–146.
Tomkovick, C., & Miller, C. (2000). Perspective – riding the wind: Managing new product development
in an age of change. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17(6), 413–423.
Urban, G.L., & Hauser, J.R. (1993). Design and marketing of new products. Englewood Cliffs, New
Jersey, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Wong, K.Y., & Aspinwall, E. (2004). Characterizing knowledge management in the small business
environment. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(3), 44–61.
Woodcock, D.J., Mosey, S.P., & Wood, T.B.W. (2000). New product development in British SMEs.
European Journal of Innovation Management, 3(4), 212–222.
Wu, S.-Y., & Chen, P.-Y. (2007). Versioning and piracy control for digital information goods. Operations
Research, 56(1), 157–172.
Zahay, D., Hajli, N., & Sihi, D. (2018). Managerial perspectives on crowdsourcing in the new product
development process. Industrial Marketing Management, 71(1), 41–53.
Zhan, Y., & Tan, K.H. (2020). An analytic infrastructure for harvesting big data to enhance supply
chain performance. European Journal of Operational Research, 281(3), 559–574.
Zhang, J., Craciun, G., & Shin, D. (2010). When does electronic word-of-mouth matter? A study of
consumer product reviews. Journal of Business Research, 63(12), 1336–1341.
Further reading
Clark, K.B., & Fujimoto, T. (1991). Product development performance. Boston, Massachusetts, MA:
Harvard Business School Press.
Marion, T.J., Meyer, M.H., & Barczak, G. (2014). The influence of digital design and IT on modular
product architecture. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(1), 98–110.
Ozer, M. (2000). Information technology and new product development – opportunities and pitfalls.
Industrial Marketing Management, 29, 387–396.
Wu, L., Liu, H., & Su, K. (2020). Exploring the dual effect of effectuation on new product development
speed and quality. Journal of Business Research, 106, 82–93.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
• O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do artigo na revista;
• O(s) autor(es) garante(m) que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);
• A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, ideias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);
• É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder ajustes textuais e de adequação do artigos às normas da publicação.
