Linking corporate social responsibility, cooperation and innovation: the triple bottom line perspective

Autores

  • Telma Mendes Mendes CIICESI, ESTG/P. PORTO – Centro de Inovaç~ao e Investigaç~ao em Ci^encias Empresariais e Sistemas de Informaç~ao (CIICESI)
  • Victor Braga CIICESI, ESTG/P. PORTO – Centro de Inovação e Investigação em Ciências Empresariais e Sistemas de Informação (CIICESI)
  • Aldina Correia CIICESI, ESTG/P. PORTO – Centro de Inovação e Investigação em Ciências Empresariais e Sistemas de Informação (CIICESI)
  • Carina Silva CIICESI, ESTG/P. PORTO – Centro de Inovação e Investigação em Ciências Empresariais e Sistemas de Informação (CIICESI)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-03-2021-0039

Palavras-chave:

Corporate social responsibility, Cooperation, Innovation, Eco-innovation

Resumo

Purpose – Drawing on the resource-based view (RBV) and knowledge-based view (KBV) theories, this study
contributes to deepen the knowledge that corporate social responsibility (CSR) exerts on firms’ innovation,
considering the role played by cooperation. The research also seeks to ascertain the factors that influence the
development of business cooperation.


Design/methodology/approach – The database used is the Community Innovation Survey (CIS, 2014)
applied in the European Union (EU) during the time period 2012–2014. A sample of 7083 Portuguese firms were
analyzed through the partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM).


Findings – The results suggest that CSR positively relates with firms’ innovation, and business cooperation
partially mediates this relationship. The outcomes also reveal that investing in certain types of innovation
activities increases the firms’ willingness to cooperate.


Originality/value – The findings contribute to encourage an open innovation strategy as an easy and
effective way to cope with rapid trends and changes, since it demonstrates the complementary between
innovation and cooperation, as sources of value creation. From a triple bottom line (TBL) perspective, it also
highlights that CSR must include social, economic and environmental initiatives, and should be a part of the
firms’ innovation strategy. As a result, managers who intend to contribute for society in the long term should
plan, monitor and manage all CSR dimensions.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Referências

Abramovsky, L., Kremp, E., L opez, A., Schmidt, T., & Simpson, H. (2009). Understanding co-operative innovative activity: Evidence from four European countries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 18(3), 243–265, doi: 10.1080/10438590801940934.

Aguirre-Urreta, M. I., & R€onkk€o, M. (2018). Statistical inference with PLSc using bootstrap confidence intervals. MIS Quarterly, 42(3), 1001–1020. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/ Mikko_Roenkkoe/publication/315697533_Statistical_Inference_with_PLSc_Using_Bootstrap_ Confidence_Intervals/links/58dcbf76a6fdcc7c9f4efe7d/Statistical-Inference-with-PLSc-UsingBootstrap-Confidence-Intervals.pdf (accessed 30 December 2020).

Alarc on, S., & S anchez, M. (2013). External and internal R&D, capital investment and business performance in the Spanish agri-food industry. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64(3), 654–675, doi: 10.1111/1477-9552.12015.

Almeyda, R., & Darmansya, A. (2019). The influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure on firm financial performance. IPTEK Journal of Proceedings Series, (5), 278–290, doi: 10.12962/j23546026.y2019i5.6340.

Amara, N., Landry, R., & Doloreux, D. (2009). Patterns of innovation in knowledge-intensive business services. Services Industries Journal, 29(4), 407–430, doi: 10.1080/02642060802307847.

Anser, M. K., Zhang, Z., & Kanwal, L. (2018). Moderating effect of innovation on corporate social responsibility and firm performance in realm of sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(5), 799–806, doi: 10.1002/csr.1495.

Arag on-Correa, J. A., Hurtado-Torres, N., Sharma, S., & Garc ıa-Morales, V. J. (2008). Environmental strategy and performance in small firms: A resource-based perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(1), 88–103, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.11.022.

Bach, M. P., Lojpur, A., Pekovi c, S., & Stanovci c, T. (2015). The influence of different information sources on innovation performance: Evidence from France, The Netherlands and Croatia. South East European Journal of Economics and Business, 10(2), 89–101, doi: 10.1515/jeb-2015-0012.

Bacinello, E., Tontini, G., & Alberton, A. (2020). Influence of maturity on corporate social responsibility and sustainable innovation in business performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 749–759, doi: 10.1002/csr.1841.

Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 197–218, doi: 10.1002/smj.441.

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120, doi: 10.1177/014920639101700108.

Batas, S., & Liu, L. (2013). The internationalization process of born-global high technology SMEs: The moderating role of business and social networks. In 2013 Suzhou-Silicon Valley-Beijing International Innovation Conference. (pp. 25-30), doi: 10.1109/SIIC.2013.6624161.

Baum, J. R., Locke, E. A., & Smith, K. G. (2001). A multidimensional model of venture growth. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 292–303, doi: 10.5465/3069456.

Bayona, C., Garc ıa-Marco, T., & Huerta, E. (2001). Firms motivations for cooperative R&D: Na empirical analysis of Spanish firms. Research Policy, 30(1), 1289–1307, doi: 10.1016/S0048- 7333(00)00151-7.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00151-7.

Becker, W., & Dietz, J. (2004). R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms - evidence for the German manufacturing industry. Research Policy, 33(2), 209–223, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2003. 07.003.

Beise, M., & Rennings, K. (2005). Lead markets and regulation: A framework for analyzing the international diffusion of environmental innovations. Ecological Economics, 52(1), 5–17, doi: 10. 1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.007.

Belderbos, R., Carree, M., Diederen, B., Lokshin, B., & Veugelers, R. (2004). Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22(8–9), 1237–1263. Available at: https://portal.cepr.org/discussion-paper/7355 (accessed 16 November 2018).

Bocquet, R., Le Bas, C., Mothe, C., & Poussing, N. (2013). Are firms with different CSR profiles equally innovative? Empirical analysis with survey data. European Management Journal, 31(6), 642–654, doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2012.07.001.

Bocquet, R., Le Bas, C., Mothe, C., & Poussing, N. (2017). CSR, innovation, and firm performance in sluggish growth contexts: A firm-level empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 146(1), 241–254, doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2959-8.

Boesso, G., Favotto, F., & Michelon, G. (2015). Stakeholder prioritization, strategic corporate social responsibility and company performance: Further evidence. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(6), 424–440, doi: 10.1002/csr.1356.

Braga, A., & Braga, V. (2013). Factors influencing innovation decision making in Portuguese firms. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 14(3–4), 329–349, doi: 10.1504/IJIL.2013. 056232.

Braga, V., Gonçalves, A. C., & Braga, A. (2016). The Portuguese textile industry business co-operation: Informal relationships for international entry. Romanian Review Precision Mechanics, Optics and Mechatronics, 49, 52–60. Available at: https://www.incdmtm.ro/editura/documente/52-60_THE%20PORTUGUESE%20TEXTILE%20INDUSTRY%20BUSINESS%20CO-OPERATION. pdf (accessed 9 January 2019).

Briones Penalver, A. J., Bernal Conesa, J. A., & de Nieves Nieto, C. (2018). Analysis of corporate social ~ responsibility in Spanish agribusiness and its influence on innovation and performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(2), 182–193, doi: 0.1002/ csr.1448.

Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural Holes. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.

Caloghirou, Y., Kastelli, I., & Tsakanikas, A. (2004). Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: Complements or substitutes for innovative performance? Technovation, 24(1), 29–39, doi: 10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00051-2.

Camacho, J., & Rodr ıguez, M. (2005). How innovative are services? An empirical analysis for Spain. The Service Industries Journal, 25(2), 253–271, doi: 10.1080/0264206042000305448.

Caro, E. M., Penalver, A. J. B., & Nieto, C. D. N. (2011). Responsabilidad social, cooperaci ~ on empresarial e innovaci on en agronegocios. Revista Europea de Direcci on y Econom ıa de la Empresa, 20(3), 63–76.

Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505, doi: 10.5465/amr.1979.4498296.

Casanueva, C., Castro, I., & Gal an, J. L. (2013). Informational networks and innovation in mature industrial clusters. Journal of Business Research, 66(5), 603–613, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012. 02.043.

Cegarra-Navarro, J. G., Reverte, C., G omez-Melero, E., & Wensley, A. K. (2016). Linking social and economic responsibilities with financial performance: The role of innovation. European Management Journal, 34(5), 530–539, doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2016.02.006.

Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 35–41.

Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

CIS (2014). The community innovation survey 2014. The Harmonized Survey Questionnaire. Available at: https://circabc.europa.eu/ui/group/47133480-29c1-4c23-9199-72a631f4fd96/library/32ab7d19- 446e-404c-9ea5-e2524065b2a0/details (accessed 12 November 2018).

CISEP/GEPE (1992). Inovação industria portuguesa – observat orio M.I.E. Lisboa: GEPE.

Costa, C., Lages, L. F., & Hortinha, P. (2015). The bright and dark side of CSR in export markets: Its impact on innovation and performance. International Business Review, 24(5), 749–757, doi: 10. 1016/j.ibusrev.2015.01.008.

Coviello, N. E., & Cox, M. P. (2006). The resource dynamics of international new venture networks. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 4(2–3), 113–132. doi:10.1007/s10843-007-0004-4.

Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1–13, doi: 10.1002/ csr.132.

Decree-Law No 98/2015, June 2 of the Ministry of Finance. Di ario da Republica: I Series, No. 106 (2015). Available at: https://dre.pt/application/conteudo/67356342 (assessed 28 March 2020).

DGEEC (2016a). Sum arios estat ısticos: CIS 2014 – inqu erito comunit ario A inovaç ~ao. Lisboa: Direção – Geral de Estat ısticas da Educação e Ciência.

DGEEC (2016b). Principais resultados do CIS 2014 – Inqu erito Comunit ario a Inovaç~ao. Available at: http://www.dgeec.mec.pt/np4/207/%7B$clientServletPath%7D/?newsId5113&fileName5Princip ais_Resultados_CIS2014_29092016.pdf (accessed 13 December 2018).

Di Tommaso, C., & Thornton, J. (2020). Do ESG scores effect bank risk taking and value? Evidence from European banks. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(5), 2286–2298, doi: 10.1002/csr.1964.

Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS Quarterly, 39(2), 297–316.

Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/95/oj (assessed 22 July 2021).

Curr as-P erez, R., Dolz-Dolz, C., Miquel-Romero, M. J., & S anchez-Garc ıa, I. (2018). How social, environmental, and economic CSR affects consumer-perceived value: Does perceived consumer effectiveness make a difference?. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(5), 733–747, doi: 10.1002/csr.1490.

Easton, G., & Araujo, L. (1992). Non-economic exchange in industrial networks in Industrial. in Axelsson, B. & Easton, G. (Eds). A New View of Reality. London: Routledge.

Efron, B. (1987). Better bootstrap confidence intervals. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82(397), 171–185, doi: 10.1080/01621459.1987.10478410.

Elche, D., & Gonz alez, A. (2008). Influence of innovation on performance: Analysis of Spanish service firms. The Service Industries Journal, 28(10), 1483–1499, doi: 10.1080/02642060802250294.

European Commission (2003). Responsible Entrepreneurship: A Collection of Good Practice Cases Among Small and Medium-sized Enterprises Across Europe. Brussels: European Commission Publishing.

European Innovation Scoreboard. (2020). European innovation scoreboard. Available at: https://ec. europa.eu/growth/industry/policy/innovation/scoreboards_en (accessed 25 January 2021).

Eurostat. (2020). High-tech aggregation by NACE rev. 1.1. Available at: ttps://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ cache/metadata/en/htec_esms.htm#annex1580829488131 (accessed 26 December 2020).

Fabrizi, A., Guarini, G., & Meliciani, V. (2018). Green patents, regulatory policies and research network policies. Research Policy, 47(6), 1018–1031, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.005.

Faems, D., Looy, B., & Debackere, K. (2005). Interorganizational collaboration and innovation: Toward a portfolio approach. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(3), 238–250, doi: 10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.00120.x.

Faria, P., Lima, F., & Santos, R. (2010). Cooperation in innovation activities: The importance of partners. Research Policy, 39(8), 1082–1092, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.003.

Fernandes, S., Ces ario, M., & Barata, J. M. (2017). Ways to open innovation: Main agents and sourcesin the Portuguese case. Technology in Society, 51, 153–162, doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.09.002.

Ferreira, J. J., & Teixeira, A. A. (2019). Open innovation and knowledge for fostering business ecosystems. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 4(4), 253–255, doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2018.10.002.

Flikkema, M., Jansen, P., & Van Der Sluis, L. (2007). Identifying neo-schumpeterian innovation in service firms: A conceptual essay with a novel classification. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16(7), 541–558, doi: 10.1080/10438590600918602.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50, doi: 10.1177/ 002224378101800104.

Freel, M. S., & Harrison, R. T. (2006). Innovation and cooperation in the small firm sector: Evidence from Northern Britain. Regional Studies, 40(4), 289–305, doi: 10.1080/00343400600725095.

Freire, A. (2000). Inovação - novos Produtos, Serviços e Neg ocios para Portugal. Lisboa, Editorial Verbo.

Friedman, M. (2007). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. In Corporate ethics and corporate governance (pp. 173–178), Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, doi: 10.1007/978-3-540- 70818-6_14.

Gallagher, V. C., Hrivnak, M. W., Valcea, S., Mahoney, C. B., & LaWong, D. (2018). A comprehensive three-dimensional sustainability measure: The ‘missing P’of ‘people’–a vital stakeholder in sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(5), 772–787, doi: 10.1002/csr.1493.

Gallego-Alvarez, I. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and innovation: A resource-based theory. Management Decision, 49(10), 1709–1727, doi: 10.1108/00251741111183843.

Garc es-Ayerbe, C., Rivera-Torres, P., & Su arez-Perales, I. (2019). Stakeholder engagement mechanisms and their contribution to eco-innovation: Differentiated effects of communication and cooperation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1321–1332, doi: 10.1002/ csr.1749.

Garc ıa-Piqueres, G., & Garc ıa-Ramos, R. (2020). Is the corporate social responsibility–innovation link homogeneous?: Looking for sustainable innovation in the Spanish context. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 803–814, doi: 10.1002/csr.1845.

Gassmann, O., Enkel, E., & Chesbrough, H. (2010). The future of open innovation. R&D Management, 40(3), 213–221, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00605.x.

Graafland, J., Van de Ven, B., & Stoffele, N. (2003). Strategies and instruments for organising CSR by small and large businesses in The Netherlands. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(1), 45–60, doi: 10. 1023/A:1026240912016.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026240912016.

Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510, doi: 10.1086/228311.

Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109–122, doi: 10.1002/smj.4250171110.

Grant, R., & Baden-Fuller, C. (2004), A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management Studies, 41(1), 61–84, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00421.x.

Gras-Gil, E., Manzano, M. P., & Fern andez, J. H. (2016). Investigating the relationship between corporate social responsibility and earnings management: Evidence from Spain. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 19(4), 289–299, doi: 10.1016/j.brq.2016.02.002.

Griggs, D., Stafford-Smith, M., Gaffney, O., Rockstrom, J., Ohman, M. C., Shyamsundar, P., Steffen, W.,Glaser, G., Kanie, N. & Noble, I. (2013). Sustainable development goals for people and planet. Nature, 495(7441), 305–307, doi: 10.1038/495305a.

Guerrero-Villegas, J., Sierra-Garc ıa, L., & Palacios-Florencio, B. (2018). The role of sustainable development and innovation on firm performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(6), 1350–1362, doi: 10.1002/csr.1644.

Gupta, P. (2008). Inovaç~ao Empresarial no s eculo XXI. Porto: Grupo Editorial Vida Econ omica. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414–433, doi: 10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G., Tomas, M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M. (2013). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling. Long Range Planning, 46(1–2), 184–185, doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2013. 01.002.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M. and Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringlec, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review. 31(1), 1–25.

Hakansson, H., & Johanson, J. (1998). Formal and informal cooperation strategies international industrial networks. In Contractor, F. J. (Ed.). Cooperative Strategies in International Bussiness. Toronto.

Hanna, V., & Walsh, K. (2008). Interfirm cooperation among small manufacturing firms. International Small Business Journal, 26(3), 299–321, doi: 10.1177/0266242608088740.

Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014, doi: 10.5465/amr.1995.9512280033.

He, W., & Shen, R. (2019). ISO 14001 certification and corporate technological innovation: Evidence from Chinese firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 158(1), 97–117, doi: 10.1007/s10551-017-3712-2.

Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T. K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D. W., Ketchen, D. J., Hair, J. F., Hult, T. M. & Calantone, R, J. (2014). Common beliefs and reality about PLS: Comments on R€onkk€o and Evermann (2013). Organizational Research Methods, 17(2), 182–209, doi: 10.1177/1094428114526928.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135, doi: 10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8.

Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20, doi: 10.1108/IMDS09-2015-0382.

Hern andez, S. B., & S anchez, P. E. (2012). La influencia de las pol ıticas de responsabilidad social y la pertenencia a redes de cooperaci on en el capital relacional y estructural de las microempresas. Investigaciones Europeas de Direcci on y Econom ıa de la Empresa, 18(2), 166–176, doi: 10.1016/ S1135-2523(12)70007-2.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1135-2523(12)70007-2.

Hipp, C., & Grupp, H. (2005). Innovation in the service sector: The demand for service-specific innovation measurement concepts and typologies. Research Policy, 34(4), 517–535, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.002.

Horbach, J., Oltra, V., & Belin, J. (2013). Determinants and specificities of eco-innovations compared to other innovations—an econometric analysis for the French and German industry based on the community innovation survey. Industry and Innovation, 20(6), 523–543, doi: 10.1080/13662716.2013.833375.

Jamali, D., & Karam, C. (2018). Corporate social responsibility in developing countries as an emerging field of study. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 32–61, doi: 10.1111/ ijmr.12112.

Jansen, J. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmentalmoderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661–1674, doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576.

Juntunen, J. K., Halme, M., Korsunova, A., & Rajala, R. (2019). Strategies for integrating stakeholders into sustainability innovation: A configurational perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36(3), 331–355, doi: 10.1111/jpim.12481.

Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1183–1194, doi: 10.5465/ 3069433.

Kaufmann, A., & Todting, F. (2001). Science-industry interaction in the process of innovation: The importance of boundary-crossing between systems. Research Policy, 30(5), 791–804, doi: 10. 1016/S0048-7333(00)00118-9.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00118-9.

Kemp, R., & Pearson, P. (2020). Final Report MEI Project About Measuring Ecoinnovation. Maastricht: UM-MERIT. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/env/consumption-innovation/43960830.pdf (assessed 12 January 2021).

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.

Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of E-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10, doi: 10.4018/ijec.2015100101.

Koschatzky, K., & Sternberg, R. (2000). R&D cooperation in innovation systems - some lessons from the European regional innovation survey (ERIS). European Planning Studies, 8(4), 487–501, doi: 10.1080/713666415.

Kotler, P., Armstrong, G., Saunders, J., Wong, V., Miquel, S., Bign e, E., & C amara, D. (2000). Introducci on Al marketing. Madrid: Prentice Hall Lagasio, V., & Cucari, N. (2019). Corporate governance and environmental social governance disclosure: A meta-analytical review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(4), 701–711, doi: 10.1002/csr.1716.

Lazzarotti, V., Manzini, R., Nosella, A., & Pellegrini, L. (2017). Innovation ambidexterity of open firms. The role of internal relational social capital. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 29(1), 105–118, doi: 10.1080/09537325.2016.1210119.

Lee, C., Lee, K., & Pennings, J. (2001). Internal capabilities, external networks and performance: A study on technology-based ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 615–640, doi: 10.1002/smj.181.

Leifer, R., McDermott, C. M., O’Connor, G. C., Peters, L. S., Rice, M., & Veryzer, R. W. (2000). Radical innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Le on-Bravo, V., Caniato, F., Caridi, M., & Johnsen, T. (2017). Collaboration for sustainability in the food supply chain: A multi-stage study in Italy. Sustainability, 9(7), 1253–1274, doi: 10.3390/ su9071253.

Lewandowska, M. S., Szymura-Tyc, M., & Gołe˛biowski, T. (2016). Innovation complementarity, cooperation partners, and new product export: Evidence from Poland. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3673–3681, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.028.

Li, T., Ma, L., Liu, Z., & Liang, K. (2020). Economic granularity interval in decision tree algorithm standardization from an open innovation perspective: Towards a platform for sustainable matching. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 149, doi: 10.3390/joitmc6040149.

Liao, Z., & Long, S. (2019). Can interfirm trust improve firms’ cooperation on environmental innovation? The moderating role of environmental hostility. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1), 198–205, doi: 10.1002/bse.2249.

Ling, A., Forrest, S., Lynch, M., & Fox, M. (2007). Global food & beverages: Integrating ESG. New York, NY: Goldman Sachs.

Lundvall, B., & Nielsen, P. (1999). Competition and transformation in the learning economy-Illustrated by the Danish case. Revue D’ economie Industrielle, 88(1), 67–89. Available at: https://www. persee.fr/doc/rei_0154-3229_1999_num_88_1_1745 (accessed 29 November 2018).

Luo, X., & Du, S. (2015). Exploring the relationship between corporate social responsibility and firm innovation. Marketing Letters, 26(4), 703–714, doi: 10.1007/s11002-014-9302-5.

Mansfield, E. (1988). The speed and cost of industrial innovation in Japan and the United States: External vs. internal technology. Management Science, 34(10), 1157–1168, doi: 10.1287/mnsc.34.10.1157.

Melander, L. (2018). Customer and supplier collaboration in green product innovation: External and internal capabilities. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(6), 677–693, doi: 10.1002/bse.2024.

Miotti, L., & Sachwald, F. (2003). Co-operative R&D: Why and with whom? An integrated framework of analysis. Research Policy, 32(8), 481–1499, doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00159-2.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00159-2.

Mithani, M. A. (2017). Innovation and CSR—do they go well together?. Long Range Planning, 50(6),699–711, doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2016.08.002.

Navarro, M. (2002). La cooperaci on para la innovaci on de la empresa espanola desde una perspectiva ~internacional comparada. Econom ıa Industrial, (346), 47–66.

Nieto, M., & Santamar ıa, L. (2007). The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation. Techovation, 27(3), 367–377, doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2006.10.001.

Nitzl, C. (2016). The use of partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) in management accounting research: Directions for future theory development. Journal of Accounting Literature, 37, 19–35, doi: 10.1016/j.acclit.2016.09.003.

OECD (2005). Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data (3rd ed.). Paris: OECD Publishing, doi: 10.1787/9789264013100-en.

OECD (2009). Patents in environment-related technologies. Paris: OECD Publishing.

OECD (2018). Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation (4th ed.). The measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities. Paris/Eurostat, Luxembourg: OECD Publishing, doi: 10.1787/9789264304604-en.

Orlitzky, M., Siegel, D. S., & Waldman, D. A. (2011). Strategic corporate social responsibility andenvironmental sustainability. Business and Society, 50(1), 6–27, doi: 10.1177/0007650310394323.

Pan, X., Sinha, P., & Chen, X. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and eco-innovation: The triple bottom line perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 214–228, doi: 10.1002/csr.2043.

Perdomo, J., & Escobar, A. (2011). La investigaci on en RSE: Una revisi on desde el management. Cuadernos de Administraci on, 24(43), 193–219. Available at: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/205/20521435009.pdf (accessed 14 January 2021).

Pereira, R. M., MacLennan, M. L. F., & Tiago, E. F. (2020). Interorganizational cooperation and ecoinnovation: A literature review. International Journal of Innovation Science, 12(5), 477–493, doi:10.1108/IJIS-01-2020-0008.

Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 259–280, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00225.x.

Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116–145, doi: 10.2307/2393988.

Rennings, K. (2000). Redefining innovation—eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 32(2), 319–332, doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00112-3.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00112-3.

Reverte, C., G omez-Melero, E., & Cegarra-Navarro, J. G. (2016). The influence of corporate social responsibility practices on organizational performance: Evidence from eco-responsible Spanish firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2870–2884, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.128.

Ruan, L., & Liu, H. (2021). Environmental, social, governance activities and firm performance: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 13(2), 767, doi: 10.3390/su13020767.

S anchez-Hern andez, M. I., Gallardo-V azquez, D., Dziwinski, P., & Barcik, A. (2019). Innovation through corporate social responsibility: Insights from Spain and Poland. In Corporate Social Responsibility: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1086–1102). IGI Global, doi: 10.4018/978-1-5225-6192-7.ch056.

Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Hair, J. F. (2017). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In Homburg, C., Klarmann, M., Vomberg, A. (Eds.) Handbook of Market Research. Cham: Springer, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-1.

Scandelius, C., & Cohen, G. (2016). Achieving collaboration with diverse stakeholders—the role of strategic ambiguity in CSR communication. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3487–3499, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.037.

Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London and New York: George Allen & Unwin (Publishers).

Schumpeter, J. A., & Nichol, A. J. (1934). Robinson’s economics of imperfect competition. Journal of Political Economy, 42(2), 249–259.

Shields, M., & Young, S. (1994). Managing innovation costs: A study of cost consciousness behavior by R&D professionals. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 6(1), 175–189. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Michael_Shields4/publication/284388888_Managing_innovation_costs_A_study_of_cost_conscious_behavior_by_RD_professionals/links/ 5693ddea08aeab58a9a2b8ca/Managing-innovation-costs-A-study-of-cost-conscious-behaviorby-R-D-professionals.pdf (accessed 26 October 2018).

Sim~oes, V. (1997). Inovaç~ao e Gest~ao em PME. Gabinete de Estudos e Prospectiva Econ omica (GEPE). Lisboa: Minist erio de Economia.

Svensson, G., Ferro, C., Høgevold, N., Padin, C., Varela, J. C. S., & Sarstedt, M. (2018). Framing the triple bottom line approach: Direct and mediation effects between economic, social and environmental elements. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 972–991, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.226.

Tate, W. L., & Bals, L. (2018). Achieving shared triple bottom line (TBL) value creation: Toward a social resource-based view (SRBV) of the firm. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(3), 803–826, doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3344-y.

Tether, B. (2002). Who co-operates for innovation, and why. An empirical analysis. Research Policy, 31(6), 947–967, doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00172-X.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01) 00172-X.

Torugsa, N. A., O’Donohue, W., & Hecker, R. (2013). Proactive CSR: An empirical analysis of the role of its economic, social and environmental dimensions on the association between capabilities and performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(2), 383–402.

Tourigny, D., & Le, C. D. (2004). Impediments to innovation faced by Canadian manufacturing firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 13(3), 217– 250, doi: 10.1080/10438590410001628387.

Tsai, K. (2009). Collaborative networks and product innovation performance: Toward a contingency perspective. Research Policy, 38(5), 765–778, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.012.

Valdez-Ju arez, L. E., & Castillo-Vergara, M. (2021). Technological capabilities, open innovation, and eco-innovation: Dynamic capabilities to increase corporate performance of SMEs. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 8–27, doi: 10.3390/joitmc7010008.

Vishwanathan, P., van Oosterhout, H., Heugens, P. P., Duran, P., & Van Essen, M. (2020). Strategic CSR: A concept building meta-analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 57(2), 314–350, doi: 10.1111/joms.12514.

Weiss, P. (2003). Adoption of product and process innovations in differentiated markets: The impact of competition. Review of Industrial Organization, 23(3–4), 301–314, doi: 10.1023/B:REIO. 0000031372.79077.fc.https://doi.org/10.1023/B:REIO.0000031372.79077.fc.

Y anez-Araque, B., Hern ~ andez, J. P. S. I., Guti errez-Broncano, S., & Jim enez-Est evez, P. (2020). Corporate social responsibility in micro-, small-and medium-sized enterprises: Multigroup analysis of family vs. nonfamily firms. Journal of Business Research, 124, 581–592, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.023.

Yun, J. J., Zhao, X., Jung, K., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2020). The culture for open innovation dynamics.Sustainability, 12(12), 5076, doi: 10.3390/su12125076.

Zhao, C., Guo, Y., Yuan, J., Wu, M., Li, D., Zhou, Y., & Kang, J. (2018). ESG and corporate financial performance: Empirical evidence from China’s listed power generation companies. Sustainability, 10(8), 2607, doi: 10.3390/su10082607.

Zhu, Q., Zou, F., & Zhang, P. (2019). The role of innovation for performance improvement through corporate social responsibility practices among small and medium-sized suppliers in China. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(2), 341–350, doi: 10.1002/csr.1686.

Downloads

Publicado

2023-09-13

Edição

Seção

Artigos

Como Citar

Linking corporate social responsibility, cooperation and innovation: the triple bottom line perspective. (2023). INMR - Innovation & Management Review, 20(3), 244-280. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-03-2021-0039