Critical success factors of co-innovation platforms: a systematic literature review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-06-2022-0081Palavras-chave:
s Co-innovation platforms, Collaborative innovation, Platform ecosystem, New product development, Systematic literature reviewResumo
PurposeCollaborating with consumers during new product development can provide companies with significant benefits and competitive advantages. Although several studies have been conducted on the design of co-innovation platforms, there is still a need for a more comprehensive understanding of the co-innovation phenomenon. To address this gap, this research aims to identify the critical success factors of co-innovation platforms and provide an extensive analysis of the variables that determine their effectiveness.
Design/methodology/approachThis study presents a systematic literature review of co-innovation platforms based on an analysis of 89 articles published in 50 scholarly journals in the disciplines of information systems, marketing and business, covering the years from 2006 to 2022.
FindingsThe review synthesizes the current state of scientific knowledge and groups prior studies thematically as critical success factors of co-innovation platforms. As a result, eight success factors have been identified in terms of quantity and quality of contributions. These factors include product involvement, perceived fairness, sense of community, interactive environment, employee involvement, participant diversity, assessment structure and task design.
Originality/valueThe study consolidates existing research about the critical success of co-innovation platforms. It also provides a research framework that incorporates a diverse set of variables that can be used to assess co-innovation performance in future studies.
Downloads
Referências
Akman, H., Plewa, C., & Conduit, J. (2019). Co-creating value in online innovation communities. European Journal of Marketing, 53(6), 1205–1233.
Bharti, K., Agrawal, R., & Sharma, V. (2015). Literature review and proposed conceptual framework. International Journal of Market Research, 57(4), 571–604.
Chou, E.Y., Lin, C. Y., & Huang, H.C. (2016). Fairness and devotion go far: Integrating online justice and value co-creation in virtual communities. International Journal of Information Management, 36(1), 60–72.
Cleaver, L., Lawas, K., & Marshall, A. (2023). How business can address sensitive cultural challenges through tech-enabled, large-scale open collaboration and innovation with stakeholders. Strategy and Leadership, 51(1), 35–40.
Fernandes, T., & Remelhe, P. (2016). How to engage customers in co-creation: Customers’ motivations for collaborative innovation. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 24(3), 311–326.
Franke, N., Keinz, P., & Klausberger, K. (2013). Does this sound like a fair deal?”: Antecedents and consequences of fairness expectations in the individual’s decision to participate in firm innovation. Organization Science, 24(5), 1495–1516.
Füller, J. (2010). Refining virtual co-creation from a consumer perspective. California Management Review, 52(2), 98–122.
Füller, J., & Bilgram, V. (2017). The moderating effect of personal features on the consequences of an enjoyable co-creation experience. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 26(4), 386–401.
Füller, J., Hutter, K., & Faullant, R. (2011). Why co-creation experience matters? Creative experience and its impact on the quantity and quality of creative contributions. R and D Management, 41(3), 259–273.
Füller, K., Weking, J., Böhm, M., & Krcmar, H. (2019). Leveraging customer-integration experience: A review of influencing factors and implications. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 44(1), 4.
Grissemann, U. S., & Stokburger-Sauer, N. E. (2012). Customer co-creation of travel services: The role of company support and customer satisfaction with the co-creation performance. Tourism Management, 33(6), 1483–1492.
Guzel, M., Sezen, B., & Alniacik, U. (2020). Drivers and consequences of customer participation into value co-creation: A field experiment. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 30(7), 1047–1061.
Hendricks, L., & Matthyssens, P. (2023). Platform ecosystem development in an institutionalized business market: The case of the asset management industry. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 38(2), 395–413.
Hofstetter, R., Aryobsei, S., & Herrmann, A. (2018). Should you really produce what consumers like online? Empirical evidence for reciprocal voting in open innovation contests. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(2), 209–229.
Hossain, M., & Islam, K. Z. (2015). Ideation through online open innovation platform: Dell IdeaStorm. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 6(3), 611–624.
Huertas, M. K., Veludo-de-Oliveira, T.M., & Leite, M.G. (2013). Internet tool use and virtual Co-creation in the Brazilian construction industry: Organizational practices and consumers’ personal values. Latin American Business Review, 14(3), 209–226.
Hutter, K., Hautz, J., Füller, J., Mueller, J., & Matzler, K. (2011). Communitition: The tension between competition and collaboration in community‐based design contests. Creativity and Innovation Management, 20(1), 3–21.
Jahanmir, S. F., & Lages, L.F. (2015). The lag-user method: Using laggards as a source of innovative ideas. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 37, 65–77.
Jiang, H., Yang, J., & Gai, J. (2023). How digital platform capability affects the innovation performance of SMEs—evidence from China. Technology in Society, 72, 102187.
Jukić, T., Pevcin, P., Benčina, J., Dečman, M., & Vrbek, S. (2019). Collaborative innovation in public administration: Theoretical background and research trends of co-production and co-creation. Administrative Sciences, 9(4), 90.
Li, J., Liphong, T., Qin, Y., & Gu, Q. (2020). Understanding continuous participation of customers in online co-innovation community. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 15(6), 927–936.
Liu, Q., Du, Q., Hong, Y., Fan, W., & Wu, S. (2020a). User idea implementation in open innovation communities: Evidence from a new product development crowdsourcing community. Information Systems Journal, 30(5), 899–927.
Liu, S., Xiao, W., Fang, C., Zhang, X., & Lin, J. (2020b). Social support, belongingness, and value co-creation behaviors in online health communities. Telematics and Informatics, 50, 101398.
Ma, J., Lu, Y., & Tang, J. (2023). The differential effect of learning from others on creative performance over individual tenure: Empirical evidence from open innovation communities. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(9), 2329–2349.
Marchi, G., Giachetti, C., & De Gennaro, P. (2011). Extending lead-user theory to online brand communities: The case of the community Ducati. Technovation, 31(8), 350–361.
Martínez-Torres, M. R. (2014). Analysis of open innovation communities from the perspective of social network analysis. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 26(4), 435–451.
Muzellec, L., Ronteau, S., & Lambkin, M. (2015). Two-sided internet platforms: A business model lifecycle perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 45, 139–150.
Nobre, H., & Ferreira, A. (2017). Gamification as a platform for brand co-creation experiences. Journal of Brand Management, 24(4), 349–361.
Nohutlu, Z. D., Englis, B. G., Groen, A. J., & Constantinides, E. (2021). Customer cocreation experience in online communities: Antecedents and outcomes. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(2), 630–659.
Pedeliento, G., Andreini, D., & Veloutsou, C. (2020). Brand community integration, participation and commitment: A comparison between consumer-run and company-managed communities. Journal of Business Research, 119, 481–494.
Poetz, M. K., & Schreier, M. (2012). The value of crowdsourcing: Can users really compete with professionals in generating new product ideas?. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(2), 245–256.
Priharsari, D., & Abedin, B. (2021). What facilitates and constrains value co-creation in online communities: A sociomateriality perspective. Information and Management, 58(6), 103433.
Priharsari, D., Abedin, B., & Mastio, E. (2020). Value co-creation in firm sponsored online communities: What enables, constrains, and shapes value. Internet Research.
Ranjan, K. R., & Read, S. (2016). Value co-creation: Concept and measurement. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(3), 290–315.
Renard, D., & Davis, J. G. (2019). Social interdependence on crowdsourcing platforms. Journal of Business Research, 103, 186–194.
Roberts, D. L., Palmer, R., & Hughes, M. (2021). Innovating the product innovation process to enable co‐creation. R&D Management, 52(3), 1–14.
Schemmann, B., Herrmann, A. M., Chappin, M. M., & Heimeriks, G. J. (2016). Crowdsourcing ideas: Involving ordinary users in the ideation phaseof new product development. Research Policy, 45(6), 1145–1154.
Schreier, M., Fuchs, C., & Dahl, D.W. (2012). The innovation effect of user design: Exploring consumers’ innovation perceptions of firms selling products designed by users. Journal of Marketing, 76(5), 18–32.
Singh, V. K., Singh, P., Karmakar, M., Leta, J., & Mayr, P. (2021). The journal coverage of Web of science, Scopus and dimensions: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 126, 5113–5142.
Trabucchi, D., & Buganza, T. (2022). Landlords with no lands: A systematic literature review on hybrid multi-sided platforms and platform thinking. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(6), 64–96.
Trabucchi, D., Buganza, T., & Verganti, R. (2021). Quantity or quality? Value creation in two-sided platforms. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 33(2), 162–175.
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222.
Von Briel, F., & Recker, J. (2017). Lessons from a failed implementation of an online open innovation community. MIS Quarterly Executive, 16(1), 35–46.
Wang, Y., Hsiao, S. H., Yang, Z., & Hajli, N. (2016). The impact of sellers’ social influence on the co-creation of innovation with customers and brand awareness in online communities. Industrial Marketing Management, 54, 56–70.
Wang, K., Wang, H., & Tao, Y. (2017). Combining ideas in crowdsourced idea generation. Foundations of Management, 9(1), 203–212.
Windasari, N. A., & Visita, L. (2019). User engagement mechanisms of online co-design service: Does user innovativeness matter?. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 24(1), 59–82.
Wong, T. Y., Peko, G., Sundaram, D., & Piramuthu, S. (2016). Mobile environments and innovation co-creation processes & ecosystems. Information and Management, 53(3), 336–344.
Wu, L. W. (2017). The bright side and dark side of co-production: A dyadic analysis. Management Decision, 55(3), 614–631.
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112.
Yang, M., & Han, C. (2021). Stimulating innovation: Managing peer interaction for idea generation on digital innovation platforms. Journal of Business Research, 125, 456–465.
Zhang, T. C., Kandampully, J., & Bilgihan, A. (2015). Motivations for customer engagement in online co-innovation communities (OCCs): A conceptual framework. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 6(3), 311–328.
Zhang, M., Hu, M., Guo, L., & Liu, W. (2017). Understanding relationships among customer experience, engagement, and word-of-mouth intention on online brand communities. Internet Research, 27(4), 839–857.
Zhang, S., Pan, S. L., & hua Ouyang, T. (2020). Building social translucence in a crowdsourcing process: A case study of miui. Com. Information and Management, 57(2), 103172.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Elif Ozturk, Hande Bahar Turker, V. Aslihan Nasir
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
• O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do artigo na revista;
• O(s) autor(es) garante(m) que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);
• A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, ideias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);
• É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder ajustes textuais e de adequação do artigos às normas da publicação.
