Does eco-innovation lead to company growth?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1108/inmr-04-2023-0052Palavras-chave:
Eco-innovation, Employment, Manufacturing, Propensity score matching, SalesResumo
PurposeThis study presents new empirical evidence to the relatively scarce number of research papers on the correlation between eco-innovation and company growth. It sheds light on the causal relationship between these two variables.
Design/methodology/approachData from the Spanish Technological Innovation Panel from 2008 to 2016. Propensity Score Matching is applied to avoid self-selection problems.
FindingsThe study found that engaging eco-innovation has no statistically significant impact on employment and sales growth. Therefore, the main benefits of transitioning to green innovations are in the environmental aspect.
Practical implicationsThe research findings provide a clear direction for policymakers. Such directions suggest the design of instruments that make the adoption of eco-innovations mandatory with the firm promise of substantial environmental benefits.
Originality/valueThe paper explores an important issue for environmental policy. If being an eco-innovator is positively or at least neutrally related to growth, policymakers could create measures that encourage this type of green innovation. This would benefit the environment, and if the impact is positive, it would also have a positive social effect.
Downloads
Referências
Banerjee, S. B. (2001). Managerial perceptions of corporate environmentalism: Interpretations from industry and strategic implications for organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 38(4), 489–513. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00246.
Bitencourt, C. C., Santini, F., Zanandrea, G., Froehlich, C., & Ladira, W. J. (2020). Empirical generalizations in eco-innovation: A meta-analytic approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118721. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118721.
Brécard, D., Boubaker, H., Sterenn, L., Perraudeau, Y., & Salladarré, F. (2009). Determinants of demand for green products: An application to eco-label demand for fish in Europe. Ecological Economics, 69(1), 115–125. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.07.017.
Cainelli, G., Mazzanti, M., & Zoboli, R. (2011). Environmentally oriented innovative strategies and firm performance in services. Micro-evidence from Italy. International Review of Applied Economics, 25(1), 61–85. doi: 10.1080/02692170903426146.
Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2008). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Survey, 22(1), 31–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x.
Carrasco, I., & Buendía-Martínez, I. (2016). From the business strategy result to a source of economic development: The dual role of CSR. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 26(1), 69–86.
Chen, H., Zeng, S., Lin, H., & Ma, H. (2015). Munificence, dynamism, and complexity: How industry context drives corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(2), 125–141. doi: 10.1002/bse.1902.
Cheng, C. C., & Shiu, E. C. (2012). Validation of a proposed instrument for measuring eco-innovation: An implementation perspective. Technovation, 32(6), 329–344. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2012.02.001.
Chiou, T. Y., Chan, H. K., Lettice, F., & Chung, S. H. (2011). The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(6), 822–836. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2011.05.016.
Coad, A. (2009). The growth of firms: A survey of theories and empirical evidence. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Colombelli, A., Krafft, J., & Quatraro, F. (2021). Firms’ growth, green gazelles and eco-innovation: Evidence from a sample of European firms. Small Business Economics, 56(4), 1721–1738. doi: 10.1007/s11187-019-00236-8.
Cornell University, INSEAD &WIPO. (2020). The global innovation Index 2020: Who will finance innovation? Ithaca, Fontainebleau, and Geneva: Cornell University, INSEAD & WIPO.
del Rio, P., Peñasco, C., & Romero-Jordán, D. (2015). Distinctive features of environmental innovators: An econometric analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(6), 361–385. doi: 10.1002/bse.1822.
Demire, P., & Mazzucato, M. (2013). Innovation and economic performance (industrial and financial). In A. Pyka, & H. P. Burghof (Eds.), Innovation and Finance. Routledge.
Demirel, P., & Danisman, G. O. (2019). Eco-innovation and firm growth in the circular economy: Evidence from European small- and medium-sized enterprises. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(8), 1608–1618. doi: 10.1002/bse.2336.
Demirel, P., & Kesidou, E. (2011). Stimulating different types of eco‐innovation in the UK: Government policies and firm motivations. Ecological Economics, 70(8), 1546–1557. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.019.
Demirel, P., Iatridis, K., & Kesidou, E. (2018). The impact of regulatory complexity upon self-regulation: Evidence from the adoption and certification of environmental management systems. Journal of Environmental Management, 207, 80–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.019.
Doran, J., & Ryan, G. (2012). Regulation and firm perception, eco-innovation and firm performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 15(4), 421–441. doi: 10.1108/14601061211272367.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Tabrizi, B. N. (1995). Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Administrative Science, Q(40), 84–110. doi: 10.2307/2393701.
European Commission, Directorate-General for Environment (2017). Attitudes of European citizens towards the environment: Report. Publications Office. Available from: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2779/84809 (accessed 13 January 2023).
European Environment Agency (2019). The European environment state and outlook 2020. Knowledge for transition to a sustainable Europe. Luxembourg: European Environment Agency. Office of the European Unión.
Frondel, M., Horbach, J., Rennings, K., & Requate, T. (2005). Environmental policy tools and firm-level management practices: Empirical evidence for Germany. Economics Working Paper, 2004-02. Kiel: Kiel University, Department of Economics. Available from: https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:101:1-200910132048
Gagliardi, L., Marin, G., & Miriello, C. (2016). The greener the better? Job creation effects of environmentally-friendly technological change. Industrial and Corporate Change, 25(5), 779–807. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtv054.
García-Quevedo, J., Martinez-Ros, E., & Tchorzewska, K. B. (2022). End-of-pipe and cleaner production technologies. Do policy instruments and organizational capabilities matter? Evidence from Spanish firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 340, 130307. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130307.
Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101889.
Halbritter, G., & Dorfleitner, G. (2015). The wages of social responsibility-where are they? A critical review of ESG investing. Review of Financial Economics, 26(1), 25–35. doi: 10.1016/j.rfe.2015.03.004.
Harrison, R., Jaumandreu, J., Mairesse, J., & Peters, B. (2014). Does innovation stimulate employment? A firm-level analysis using comparable micro-data from four European countries. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 35, 29–43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2014.06.001.
Hizarci-Payne, A. K., Ipek, I., & Gumus, G. K. (2020). How environmental innovation influences firm performance: A meta-analytic review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 1174–1190. doi: 10.1002/bse.2678.
Hojnik, J., & Ruzzier, M. (2016). The driving forces of process eco-innovation and its impact on performance: Insights from Slovenia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, 812–825. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.002.
Horbach, J. (2010). The impact of innovation activities on employment in the environmental sector – empirical results for Germany at the firm level. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 230(4), 403–419. doi: 10.1515/jbnst-2010-0403.
Horbach, J. & Rammer, Ch. (2019). Employment and performance effects of circular economy innovations. ZEW - Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper 19-016. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3383936. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3383936 (accessed 25 February 2023).
Horbach, J., & Rammer, C. (2020). Circular economy innovations, growth and employment at the firm level: Empirical evidence from Germany. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 24(3), 615–625. doi: 10.1111/jiec.12977.
Horbach, J., & Rennings, K. (2013). Environmental innovation and employment dynamics in different technology fields—an analysis based on the German Community Innovation Survey 2009. Journal of Cleaner Production, 57, 158–165. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.034.
Hu, R., Xu, W., Yang, Y., & Ni, G. (2023). A combined scientometric and meta-analysis exploration of eco-innovation: Evolution and determinants. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(1), 3174–3201, published online 21 March 2023. doi: 10.1007/s13132-023-01331-8.
Ilyas, I. M., & Osiyevskyy, O. (2021). Exploring the impact of sustainable value proposition on firm performance. European Management Journal, 5, 729–740. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2021.09.009.
Jové‐Llopis, E., & Segarra‐Blasco, A. (2018). Eco‐efficiency actions and firm growth in European SMEs. Sustainability, 10(1), 281. doi: 10.3390/su10010281.
Kunapatarawong, R., & Martínez-Ros, E. (2016). Towards green growth: How does green innovation affect employment?. Research Policy, 45(6), 1218–1232. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.013.
Lasisi, T. T., Alola, A. A., Muoneko, O. B., & Eluwole, K. K. (2022). The moderating role of environmental related innovation and technologies in growth-energy utilization nexus in highest performing eco-innovating economies. Technology Forecasting and Social Change, 183, 121953. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121953.
Leoncini, R., Marzucchi, A., Montresor, S., Rentocchini, F., & Rizzo, U. (2017). ‘Better late than never’: The interplay between green technology and age for firm growth. Small Business Economics, 52(4), 891–904. doi: 10.1007/s11187-017-9939-6.
Licht, G., & Peters, B. (2013). The impact of green innovation on employment growth in Europe. WWWforEurope Working Paper, 53. Available from: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/125705/1/WWWforEurope_WPS_no050_MS53.pdf (accessed 12 January 2023).
Licht, G., & Peters, B. (2014). Do green innovations stimulate employment? Firm-level evidence from Germany. WWWforEurope Working Paper, 53. Available from: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/125706/1/WWWforEurope_WPS_no053_MS54.pdf (accessed 12 January 2022).
Pfeiffer, F., & Rennings, K. (2001). Employment impacts of cleaner production – evidence from a German study using case studies and surveys. Business Strategy and the Environment, 10(3), 161–175. doi: 10.1002/bse.285.
Porter, M. E., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment‐competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118, doi: 10.1257/jep.9.4.97.
Rennings, K. (2000). Redefining innovation — eco‐innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 32(2), 319–332. doi: 10.1016/S0921‐8009(99)00112‐3.
Rennings, K., Ziegler, A., & Zwick, T. (2004). The effect of environmental innovations on employment changes: An econometric analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13(6), 374–387. doi: 10.1002/bse.424.
Soltmann, C., Stucki, T., & Wörter, M. (2015). The impact of environmentally friendly innovations on value added. Environmental and Resource Economics, 62(3), 457–479. doi: 10.1007/s10640-014-9824-6.
Zhang, D., Rong, Z., & Ji, Q. (2019). Green innovation and firm performance: Evidence from listed companies in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 144, 48–55. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.023.
Zheng, L., & Iatridis, K. (2022). Friends or foes? A systematic literature review and meta‐analysis of the relationship between eco‐innovation and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1249–1874. doi: 10.1002/bse.2986.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Amaia Altuzarra Artola
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
• O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do artigo na revista;
• O(s) autor(es) garante(m) que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);
• A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, ideias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);
• É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder ajustes textuais e de adequação do artigos às normas da publicação.
