Cartas percentílicas da proficiência motora de crianças com idades entre os seis e os 10 anos

Autores

  • Luciana Ferreira Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brasil. University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, EUA.
  • José Luiz Lopes Vieira Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brasil.
  • Pâmela Norraila da Silva Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brasil.
  • Franciele Ferreira da Rocha Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brasil.
  • Priscila Caçola University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, EUA.
  • Raquel Nichele de Chaves Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/1807-5509202000040639

Palavras-chave:

Proficiência Motora, Bruininks-Oseretsky, Valores de referência

Resumo

Este estudo teve como objetivos principais (i) apresentar valores normativos para os oito subtestes do Teste de Proficiência Motora Bruininks-Oseretsky (BOT-2) e (ii) contrastar com os valores sugeridos no manual do teste original. A amostra foi constituída por 931 crianças com idade entre os seis e 10 anos,
de ambos os sexos, provenientes do município de Maringá-PR. Para a avaliação da profi ciência motora foi utilizado o BOT-2. A construção dos valores de referência percentílica foi efetuada com base no método LMS, implementado no software LMSchartmaker Pro versão 2.54. As meninas obtiveram maiores escores nos subtestes precisão motora fina, integração motora fina, destreza manual e equilíbrio. Os meninos apresentaram maiores escores na coordenação de membros superiores, velocidade e agilidade e força muscular. As crianças maringaenses avaliadas apresentaram valores superiores às crianças norte-americanas nos subtestes de coordenação bilateral, velocidade e agilidade, equilíbrio e coordenação dos membros superiores. Os resultados expressam a forte variabilidade interindividual em termos de profi ciência motora, bem como diferenças entre meninos e meninas. As curvas ilustram o aumento dos níveis de proficiência motora ao longo das idades, com trajetórias distintas para cada subteste. Desse modo, a utilização dos valores normativos apresentados neste estudo poderá auxiliar a ação pedagógica nos contextos escolares e esportivos, contribuindo para o planejamento de intervenções motoras mais efetivas.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Referências

Gabbard C. Lifelong motor development. San Franciso: Pearson; 2008.

Gallahue DL, Ozmun JC, Goodway JD. Compreendendo o desenvolvimento motor: bebês, crianças, adolescentes e adultos. Porto Alegre: AMGH; 2013.

Melnik BC, John SM, Schmitz G. Milk consumption during pregnancy increases birth weight, a risk factor for the development of diseases of civilization. J Transl Med. 2015;13:1-12. doi: 10.1186/s12967-014-0377-9.

Logan SW, Ross SM, Chee K, Stodden DF, Robinson LE. Fundamental motor skills: a systematic review of terminology. J Sports Sci. 2017;21:1-16. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2017.1340660.

Bart O, Jarus T, Erez Y, Rosenberg L. How do young children with DCD participate and enjoy daily activities? Res Dev Disabil 2011;32:1317-1322.

Mancini VO, Rigoli D, Cairney J, Roberts LD, Piek JP. The elaborated environmental stress hypothesis as a framework for understanding the association between motor skills and internalizing problems: a mini-review. Front Psychol. 2016;7:1-6.

Lingam R, Jongmans MJ, Ellis M, Hunt LP, Golding J, Emond A. Mental health difficulties in children with developmental coordination disorder. Pediatrics. 2012;129: e882–e891.

Hill EL, Brown D, Sorgardt K. A preliminary investigation of quality of life satisfaction reports in emerging adults with and without developmental coordination disorder. J Adult Dev. 2011;18:130-134.

Hardy LL, Reinten-Reynolds T, Espinel P, Zask A, Okely AD. Prevalence and correlates of low fundamental movement skill competency in children. Pediatrics. 2012;130:390-8.

Cattuzzo MT, Henrique RS, Réb AHN, Oliveira IS, Melo BM, Moura MS, et al. Motor competence and health related physical fitness in youth: a systematic review. J Sci Med Sport. 2016;19:123-129.

D’Hondt E, Deforche B, Bourdeaudhuij I, Lenoir M. Childhood obesity affects fine motor skill performance under different postural constraints. Neurosci Lett. 2008;440:72-75.

Clark JS. Models for Ecological Data: An Introduction. London: Paperback Lab Manual; 2007.

Kambas A, Venetsanou F, Giannakidou D, Fatouros IG, Avloniti A, Chatzinikolaou A, et al. The motorproficiency-test for children between 4 and 6 years of age (MOT 4-6): an investigation of its suitability in Greece. Res Dev Disabil. 2012;33:1626-1632.

Ulrich DA. The Test of Gross Motor Development - 3 (TGMD-3): Administration, scoring, and international norms. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 2013;24:27-33.

Henderson SE, Sugden DA, Barnett AL. Movement assessment battery for children second edition. London: Psychological Corporation; 2007.

Kiphard EJ, Schilling VF. Körper-koordinations-test für kinder KTK: manual Von Fridhelm Schilling. Weinhein: Beltz Test; 1974.

Bruininks, R.; Bruininks, B. Bruininks–Oseretsky test of motor proficiency, second edition. Minneapolis: NCS Pearson; 2005.

Cools W, Martelaer K, Samaey C, Andries C. Movement skill assessment of typically developing preschool children: A review of seven movement skill assessment tools. J Sports Sci Med. 2009;8:154-168.

Effgen S K. Meeting the Physical Therapy Needs of Children. Philadelphia: Davis Company; 2012.

McIntyre F, Parker H, Thornton A, Licari M, Piek J, Rigoli D, Hands B. Assessing motor proficiency in young adults: the Bruininks Oseretsky Test-2 Short Form and the McCarron Assessment of Neuromuscular Development. Hum Mov Sci. 53 (2017) 55–62

Kennedy J, Brown T, Stagnitti K. Top-down and bottom-up approaches to motor skill assessment of children: Are child-report and parent-report perceptions predictive of children’s performance-based assessment results? Scand J Occup Ther. 2013;20:45-53.

Brown T, Rodger S, Brown A, Roever C. A profile of Canadian pediatric occupational therapy practice. Occup Ther Health Care. 2007;21:39–69.

Wuang Y, Lin Y, Su C. Rasch analysis of the Bruininks–Oseretsky test of motor proficiency-second edition in intellectual disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2009;30:1132–1144.

Bouchard C, Malina RM, Pérusse L. Genetics of fitness and physical performance. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 1997.

Chaves RN, Tani G, Souza MC, Santos D, Maia J. Variabilidade na coordenação motora: uma abordagem centrada no delineamento gemelar. Rev Bras Educ Fís Esporte. 2012;26:301-311.

Chaves RN, Tani G, Souza MC, Baxter-Jones A, Maia J. Desempenho coordenativo de crianças: construção de cartas percentílicas baseadas no método LMS de Cole e Green. Rev Bras Educ Fís Esporte. 2013;27:1-17.

Vidal SM, Bustamante A, Lopes VP, Seabra A, Silva RG, Maia JA. Construção de cartas centílicas da coordenação motora de crianças dos 6 aos 11 anos da Região Autónoma dos Açores, Portugal. Rev Port Cien Desp. 2008;9:24-35.

Vandorpe B, Vandendriessche J, Lefevre J, et al. The KorperkoordinationsTest fur Kinder: reference values and suitability for 6-12-year-old children in Flanders. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2011;21:378-88.

Valdívia AB, Lara R, Espinoza CB, et al. Prontitud coordinativa: perfiles multivariados en función de la edad, sexo y estatus socio-económico. Rev Port Cien Desp. 2008;8:34-46.

Largo RH, Fischer JE, Rousson V. Neuromotor development from kindergarten age to adolescence: developmental course and variability. Swiss Med Wkly. 2003;133:193-97.

Silva S, Beunen G, Maia J. Valores normativos do desempenho motor de crianças e adolescentes: o estudo longitudinal-misto do Cariri. Rev Bras Educ Fís Esporte. 2011;25:111-25.

Milani S, Buckler JM, Kelnar CJ, et al. The use of local reference growth charts for clinical use or a universal standard: a balanced appraisal. J Endocrinol Invest. 2012;35:224-226.

Motta VT. Bioestatística. 2 ed. Caxias do Sul: Educs; 2006.

Cole TJ, Green PJ. Smoothing reference centile curves: the LMS method and penalized likelihood. Stat Med. 1992;11:1305-1319.

Pan H, Cole TJ. A comparison of goodness of fit tests for age-related reference ranges. Stat Med. 2004;23:1749-1765.

Royston P, Wright EM. Goodness-of-fit statistics for age-specific reference intervals. Stat Med. 2000;19:2943-2962.

Buuren S, Fredriks M. Worm plot: a simple diagnostic device for modelling growth reference curves. Stat Med. 2001;20:1259-1277.

Logan SW, Robinson, LE, Wilson AE, Lucas, WA. Getting the fundamentals of movement: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of motor skill interventions in children. Child Care Health Dev. 2011;38:305-315.

Guedes DP. Crescimento e desenvolvimento aplicado à Educação Física e ao Esporte. Rev Bras Educ Fís Esporte. 2011;25:127-40.

Clark JE, Metcalfe J. The mountain of motor development: A metaphor. In: Clark JE, Humphrey J, organizers. Motor development: Research and reviews. Reston, VA: NASPE Publications; 2002, p. 163-90.

Miyabayashi LA, Pimentel GGA. Interações sociais e proficiência motora em escolares do ensino fundamental. Rev Bras Educ Fís Esporte, 2011;25(4):649-62.

Venetsanou F, Kambas A. Motor Proficiency in Young Children: A Closer Look at Potential Gender Differences. Sage Open. 2016;6:1-10.

Mülazimoğlu-Balli Ö. Motor proficiency and body mass index of preschool children: in relation to socioeconomic status. J Educ Train Stud. 2016;4:237–43.

Yengde PN, Dhote S, Palekar T, Dighe A, Pande A. Assessment of balance using bot-2 in age group 5-15-year school going children. Asian Pac J Health Sci. 2017;4:152-160.

Chui MMY, Ng AMY, Fong AKH, Lin LSY, Ng MWF. Differences in the fine motor performance of children in Hong Kong and the United States on the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency. HKJOT. 2007;17:1-9.

Morley D, Till K, Ogilvie P, Turner G. Influences of gender and socioeconomic status on the motor proficiency of children in the UK. Hum Mov Sci. 2015;44:150-156.

Valentini NC, Oliveira MA, Pangelinan MM, Whitall J, Clark JE. Can the MABC discriminate and predict motor impairment? a comparison of Brazilian and North American children. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2017;24:1-27.

Marques A, Ekelund U, Sardinha LB. Associations between organized sports participation and objectively measured physical activity, sedentary time and weight status in youth. J Sci Med Sport. 2016;19:154-57.

Hebert JJ, Møller NC, Andersen LB, Wedderkopp N. Organized sport participation is associated with higher levels of overall health-related physical activity in children (CHAMPS Study-DK). PLoS One. 2015;10: e0134621.doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0134621

Spessato BC, Gabbard C, Robinson L, Valentini NC. Body mass index, perceived and actual physical competence: the relationship among young children. Child Care Health Dev. 2013;39:845-50.

Valentini NC, Ramalho MH, Oliveira MA. Movement assessment battery for children-2: translation, reliability, and validity for Brazilian children. Res Dev Disabil. 2014;35:733-740.

Cherney ID, Lond K. Gender-linked differences in the toys, television shows, computer games, and outdoor activities of 5- to 13-year-old children. Sex Roles. 2006;54:717–726. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9037-8.

Telama R, Yang X. Decline of physical activity from youth to young adulthood in Finland. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32:1617-22.

Singer DG, Singer JL, D’agostino H, Delong R. Children’s Pastimes and Play in Sixteen Nations Is Free-Play Declining? Am J Play. 2009;1:283-12.

Valentini NC, Clark JE, Whitall J. Developmental co-ordination disorder in socially disadvantaged Brazilian children. Child Care Health Dev. 2014;41:970-979.

Bardid F, De Meester A, Tallir I, Cardon G, Lenoir M, Haerens L. Configurations of actual and perceived motor competence among children: Associations with motivation for sports and global self-worth. Hum Mov Sci. 2016;50:1-9. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2016.09.001.

Downloads

Publicado

2020-12-22

Edição

Seção

Artigos

Como Citar

Ferreira, L. ., Vieira, J. L. L. ., Silva, P. N. da ., Rocha, F. F. da ., Caçola, P. ., & Chaves, R. N. de . (2020). Cartas percentílicas da proficiência motora de crianças com idades entre os seis e os 10 anos. Revista Brasileira De Educação Física E Esporte, 34(4), 639-652. https://doi.org/10.11606/1807-5509202000040639