Content validation of the nursing diagnosis Risk for disturbed maternal-fetal dyad*

Authors

  • Ryanne Carolynne Marques Gomes Mendes Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem, Recife, PE, Brasil. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7554-2662
  • Cecília Maria Farias de Queiroz Frazão Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem, Recife, PE, Brasil. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6403-7505
  • Ana Catarina Torres de Lacerda Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Departamento de Enfermagem, Recife, PE, Brasil. http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2161-8670
  • Marcos Venícios de Oliveira Lopes Universidade Federal do Ceará, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5867-8023
  • Francisca Márcia Pereira Linhares Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem, Recife, PE, Brasil. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9778-5024
  • Suzana de Oliveira Mangueira Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem, Recife, PE, Brasil. http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0931-8675

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/s1980-220x2019041403689

Keywords:

Nursing Diagnosis, Pregnancy, High-Risk, Maternal-Child Nursing, Validation Study

Abstract

Objective: To validate the content of the diagnosis Risk for disturbed maternal-fetal dyad in high-risk pregnant women. Method: Nursing diagnosis content analysis study in which 48 nurses evaluated agreement regarding title, definition, class, and domain of the studied nursing diagnosis, as well as the relevance of its antecedents. The items were considered relevant when the Confidence Interval of the Content Validity Index was 0.8 or higher. When lower, the item was modified or excluded according to the experts’ suggestions. Results: Out of 21 antecedents, 14 were considered relevant. The labels of five elements considered irrelevant were changed, and one item was excluded. The experts did not choose the title and definition proposed by NANDA-I, preferring instead the ones suggested in this study. The experts agreed with the class and domain proposed by the taxonomy. Conclusion: Ten risk factors, four populations at risk, and six associated conditions for this nursing diagnosis were maintained; these may provide a basis for nursing practice. The phase of clinical validation is suggested to be conducted to corroborate this study’s results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2021-04-30

How to Cite

Mendes, R. C. M. G., Frazão, C. M. F. de Q., Lacerda, A. C. T. de, Lopes, M. V. de O., Linhares, F. M. P., & Mangueira, S. de O. (2021). Content validation of the nursing diagnosis Risk for disturbed maternal-fetal dyad*. Revista Da Escola De Enfermagem Da USP, 55, e03689. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1980-220x2019041403689

Issue

Section

Original Article