Evaluative study of nursing consultation in the basic networks of Curitiba, Brazil

Authors

  • Sandra Honorato da Silva Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná; Curso de Enfermagem
  • Marcia Regina Cubas Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná; Curso de Enfermagem
  • Maira Aparecida Fedalto Secretaria Municipal de Saude
  • Sandra Regina da Silva Universidade Federal do Paraná; Hospital de Clínicas
  • Thaís Cristina da Costa Lima Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0080-62342010000100010

Keywords:

Nursing assessment, Nursing care, Classification, Public health nursing, Nursing informatics

Abstract

The implementation of the electronic health record in the basic networks of Curitiba enabled an advance in the implementation of the nursing consultation and the ICNPCH®, whose modeling uses the ICNP® axes structure and the ICNPCH® list of action. The objective of this study was to evaluate the nursing consultation from the productivity and assistance coverage perspective. The studied population was obtained from a secondary database of nursing consultations from April to June of 2005. The analysis was performed using the Datawarehouse and OLAP tool. The productivity per professional was found to be 2.5 consultations per day. Professionals use 16% of their daily work time with this activity and up to 27% of their potential per month. The ICNPCH® was used in 21% of the consultations. There is a0.08 consultation coverage per inhabitant for 6% of the population. The nursing consultation makes it possible to characterize the nurses' role in health care and a new professional position capable of affecting the construction of public politics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2010-03-01

Issue

Section

Original Article

How to Cite

Silva, S. H. da, Cubas, M. R., Fedalto, M. A., Silva, S. R. da, & Lima, T. C. da C. (2010). Evaluative study of nursing consultation in the basic networks of Curitiba, Brazil. Revista Da Escola De Enfermagem Da USP, 44(1), 68-75. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0080-62342010000100010