Intimate Partner Violence Against Pregnant Women: Study About The Repercussions On The Obstetric And Neonatal Results

Authors

  • Driéli Pacheco Rodrigues University of São Paulo; Ribeirao Preto School of Nursing
  • Flávia Azevedo Gomes-Sponholz University of São Paulo; Ribeirao Preto School of Nursing; Department of Maternal-Child Nursing and Public Health
  • Juliana Stefanelo University of São Paulo
  • Ana Márcia Spanó Nakano University of São Paulo
  • Juliana Cristina dos Santos Monteiro University of São Paulo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0080-623420140000200002

Abstract

This observational, descriptive and analytic study aimed to identify the prevalence of IPV cases among pregnant women and classify them according to the type and frequency; identify the obstetric and neonatal results and their associations with the intimate partner violence (IPV) occurrence in the current pregnancy. It was developed with 232 pregnant women who had prenatal care at a public maternity hospital. Data were collected via structured interview and in the patients’ charts and analyzed through the statistic software SAS® 9.0. Among the participants, 15.5% suffered IPV during pregnancy, among that 14.7% suffered psychological violence, 5.2% physical violence and 0.4% sexual violence. Women who did not desire the pregnancy had more chances of suffering IPV (p<0.00; OR=4.32 and 95% CI [1.77 – 10.54]). With regards to the obstetric and neonatal repercussions, there was no statistical association between the variables investigated. Thus, for the study participants there were no negative obstetric and neonatal repercussions related to IPV during pregnancy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2014-04-01

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Rodrigues, D. P., Gomes-Sponholz, F. A., Stefanelo, J., Nakano, A. M. S., & Monteiro, J. C. dos S. (2014). Intimate Partner Violence Against Pregnant Women: Study About The Repercussions On The Obstetric And Neonatal Results . Revista Da Escola De Enfermagem Da USP, 48(2), 206-212. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0080-623420140000200002