Technological drivers of dry port efficiency in Brazil

Authors

  • Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Governador Valadares
  • Fundação Municipal para Educação Comunitária, Belo Horizonte
  • Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-03-2021-0052

Keywords:

Dry Port, Brazil, DEA, Efficiency, Bootstrap Truncated Regression

Abstract

Purpose: Identify the scale efficiency of dry ports in Brazil and its main technological drivers.

Design/methodology/approach: This paper uses the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model in two stages. The first stage of the DEA was used to measure the efficiency of the dry ports. In the second stage, the Bootstrap Truncated Regression (BTR) was applied to explore the relationship between efficiency and the factors analyzed. The inputs, outputs, and contextual variables for this analysis were extracted from the secondary database provided by Revista Tecnologística.

Findings: In the first analysis stage, a high level of idleness was verified in the operations. The contextual variables in the second stage were significant: Certification, Warehouse Management System (WMS), Barcode, and Radio Frequency Identification (RFID). Results corroborate the positive impact of Information Technology (IT) coordination processes on logistics performance.

Practical Implications: Results show that dry ports operate below their technical and operational capacity and that the sector's lack of regulation in Brazil can facilitate and encourage the use of ports and marine terminals by importers and exporters.

Originality: Application of two-stage DEA measures efficiency as a sectoral benchmarking tool.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdoulkarim, H. T., Fatouma, S. H., & Hassane, H. T. (2019). Assessment of Dry Port Efficiency in Africa Using Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of Transportation Technologies, 09(02), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.4236/jtts.2019.92012

ABEPRA. (2015). O que são Portos Secos e Clias. Retrieved from http://www.abepra.org.br

Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078

Bogetoft, P., & Otto, L. (2011). Benchmarking with DEA, SFA, and R. Media. New York, NY: Springer New York.

Chang, Z., Yang, D., Wan, Y., & Han, T. (2019). Analysis of the features of Chinese dry ports: Ownership, customs service, rail service, and regional competition. Transport Policy, 82(May 2018), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.06.008

Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8

Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2007). Data Envelopment Analysis (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Springer US.

Cooper, William W, Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2011). Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis. (William W. Cooper, L. M. Seiford, & J. Zhu, Eds.), Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis (2nd ed., Vol. 164). Boston, MA: Springer US.

Giannopoulos, G. A. (2004). The application of information and communication technologies in transport. European Journal of Operational Research, 152(2), 302–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00026-2

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis.

Haralambides, H., & Gujar, G. (2012). On balancing supply chain efficiency and environmental impacts: An eco-DEA model applied to the dry port sector of India. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 14(1), 122–137. https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2011.19

Jeevan, J., Chen, S.-L., & Cahoon, S. (2017). Determining the influential factors of dry port operations: worldwide experiences and empirical evidence from Malaysia. Maritime Economics & Logistics. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-017-0063-y

Khaslavskaya, A., & Roso, V. (2020). Dry ports: research outcomes, trends, and future implications. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 22(2), 265–292. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-020-00152-9

Korovyakovsky, E., & Panova, Y. (2011). Dynamics of Russian dry ports. Research in Transportation Economics, 33(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2011.08.008

Li, Y., Dong, Q., & Sun, S. (2015). Dry Port Development in China: Current Status and Future Strategic Directions. Journal of Coastal Research, 73(1), 641–646. https://doi.org/10.2112/SI73-111.1

Lo, C. K. Y., Yeung, A. C. L., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2009). ISO 9000 and supply chain efficiency: Empirical evidence on inventory and account receivable days. International Journal of Production Economics, 118(2), 367–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.11.010

Markovits-Somogyi, R., Gecse, G., & Bokor, Z. (2011). Essential efficiency measurement of Hungarian logistics centres using data envelopment analysis. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 19(2), 97. https://doi.org/10.3311/pp.so.2011-2.06

Miraj, P., Berawi, M. A., Zagloel, T. Y., Sari, M., & Saroji, G. (2020). Research trend of dry port studies: a two-decade systematic review. Maritime Policy and Management, 00(00), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2020.1798031

Mirzabeiki, V., Roso, V., & Sjöholm, P. (2016). Collaborative tracking and tracing applied on dry Ports. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 25(3), 425–440. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLSM.2016.079834

Moshtari, M. (2016). Inter-Organizational Fit, Relationship Management Capability, and Collaborative Performance within a Humanitarian Setting. Production and Operations Management, 25(9), 1542–1557. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12568

Ng, A. K. Y., & Liu, J. J. (2014). Port-Focal Logistics and Global Supply Chains. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137273697

Ng, A. K. Y., Padilha, F., & Pallis, A. A. (2013). Institutions, bureaucratic and logistical roles of dry ports: The Brazilian experiences. Journal of Transport Geography, 27, 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.05.003

Ng, A. K. Y., & Tongzon, J. L. (2013). The Transportation Sector of India’s Economy: Dry Ports as Catalysts for Regional Development. Eurasian Geography and Economics.

Padilha, F., & Ng, A. K. Y. (2012). The spatial evolution of dry ports in developing economies: The Brazilian experience. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 14(1), 99–121. https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2011.18

Prajogo, D., Huo, B., & Han, Z. (2012). The effects of different aspects of ISO 9000 implementation on key supply chain management practices and operational performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(3), 306–322. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541211227135

Rodrigue, J. P., Debrie, J., Fremont, A., & Gouvernal, E. (2010). Functions and actors of inland ports: European and North American dynamics. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(4), 519–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JTRANGEO.2010.03.008

Rodrigue, J. P., & Notteboom, T. (2009). The terminalization of supply chains: reassessing the role of terminals in port/hinterland logistical relationships. Maritime Policy & Management, 36(2), 165-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088830902861086

Rodrigues, A. C., Martins, R. S., Wanke, P. F., & Siegler, J. (2018). Efficiency of specialized 3PL providers in an emerging economy. International Journal of Production Economics, 205, 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.09.012

Ross, A. D., & Droge, C. (2004). An analysis of operations efficiency in large-scale distribution systems. Journal of Operations Management, 21(6), 673–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2003.11.003

Santos, P. G. F. (2019). O Porto Seco no Brasil. Estudo Técnico, 20.

Simar, L. . C., & Wilson, P. W. . (2000). Statistical Inference in Nonparametric Frontier Models: The State of the Art. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 13(1), 49–78. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007864806704

Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2007). Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. Journal of Econometrics, 136(1), 31–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.07.009

Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2011). Two-stage DEA: Caveat emptor. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 36(2), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-011-0230-6

Singh, V. K., Singh, P., Karmakar, M., Leta, J., & Mayr, P. (2021). The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 126(6), 5113–5142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03948-5

Thomé, A. M. T., Scavarda, L. F., & Scavarda, A. J. (2016). The Management of Operations Conducting systematic literature review in operations management. Production Planning & Control, 7287, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2015.1129464

Wanke, P. F. (2012). Determinants of scale efficiency in the Brazilian 3PL industry: a 10-year analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 50(9), 2423–2438. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.581005

Witte, P., Wiegmans, B., & Ng, A. K. Y. (2019). A critical review on the evolution and development of inland port research. Journal of Transport Geography, 74, 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JTRANGEO.2018.11.001

Yang, C., Taudes, A., & Dong, G. (2015). Efficiency analysis of European Freight Villages: three peers for benchmarking. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 25(1), 91–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-015-0424-5

Published

2023-05-08

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

Technological drivers of dry port efficiency in Brazil. (2023). REGE Revista De Gestão, 30(2), 176-189. https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-03-2021-0052