Hepatitis B: epidemiological, immunological, and serological considerations emphasizing mutation

Authors

  • Marcelo El Khouri University of São Paulo; Faculty of Medicine; Hospital das Clínicas; Immunology Section, Central Lab Division
  • Vera Aparecida dos Santos University of São Paulo; Faculty of Medicine; Hospital das Clínicas; Immunology Section, Central Lab Division

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0041-87812004000400011

Keywords:

Hepatitis B, Edidemiology, Serology, Mutation

Abstract

The global prevalence of hepatitis B virus is estimated to be 350 million chronic carriers, varying widely from low (<2%, as in Western Europe, North America, New Zealand, Australia, and Japan) to high (>;8% as in Africa, Southeast Asia, and China). The overall prevalence in Brazil is about 8%. There are currently 7 genotypic variations, from A to G, and also 4 main surface antigen subtypes: adw, ayw, adr, and ayr. There has been great interest in identifying the geographic distribution and prognosis associated with the various genotypes and subtypes. Although the serologic test is highly sensitive and specific, it does not detect cases of mutant hepatitis B, which is increasingly common worldwide due to resistance and vaccine escape, antiviral therapy, and immunosuppression, among other causes. Alterations in surface, polymerase, X region, core, and precore genes have been described. The main mutations occur in surface and in core/precore genes, also known as occult hepatitis, since its serologic markers of active infection (HBsAg) and viral replication (HBeAg) can be negative. Thus, mutation should be suspected when serologic tests to hepatitis B show control of immunity or replication coincident with worsened clinical status and exclusion of other causes of hepatitis.

Downloads

Published

2004-01-01

Issue

Section

Reviews

How to Cite

El Khouri, M., & Santos, V. A. dos. (2004). Hepatitis B: epidemiological, immunological, and serological considerations emphasizing mutation . Revista Do Hospital Das Clínicas, 59(4), 216-224. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0041-87812004000400011