Transplants: bioethics and justice

Authors

  • Claudio Cohen
  • José Ricardo Meirelles

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0041-87812003000600001

Keywords:

Bioethics, Ethics, Equality, Justice, Lei 9.434/97, One-and-one waiting list, Transplants, Regulation 3.407/98

Abstract

Bioethics, as a branch of philosophy that focuses on questions relative to health and human life, is closely tied to the idea of justice and equality. As such, in understanding the concept of equality in its original sense, that is, in associating it to the idea to treat "unequals" (those who are unequal or different, in terms of conditions or circumstances) unequally (differentially), in proportion to their inequalities (differences), we see that the so-called "one-and-only waiting list" for transplants established in law no. 9.434/97, ends up not addressing the concept of equality and justice, bearing upon bioethics, even when considering the objective criteria of precedence established in regulation no. 9.4347/98, Thus, the organizing of transplants on a one-and-only waiting list, with a few exceptions that are weakly applicable, without a case by case technical and grounded analysis, according to each particular necessity, ends up institutionalizing inequalities, condemning patients to happenstance and, consequently, departs from the ratio legis, which aims at seeking the greatest application of justice in regards to organ transplants. We conclude, therefore, that from an analysis of the legislation and of the principles of bioethics and justice, there is a need for the creation of a collegiate of medical experts, that, based on medical criteria and done in a well established manner, can analyze each case to be included on the waiting list, deferentially and according to the necessity; thus, precluding that people in special circumstances be treated equal to people in normal circumstances.

Downloads

Published

2003-01-01

Issue

Section

Editorial

How to Cite

Transplants: bioethics and justice . (2003). Revista Do Hospital Das Clínicas, 58(6), 293-298. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0041-87812003000600001