Detection of virulence genes in Salmonella Heidelberg isolated from chicken carcasses

  • Bruna Webber Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Veterinária, Centro de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa em Patologia Aviária https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6578-7105
  • Karen Apellanis Borges Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Veterinária, Centro de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa em Patologia Aviária
  • Thales Quedi Furian Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Veterinária, Centro de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa em Patologia Aviária
  • Natalie Nadin Rizzo Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Veterinária, Centro de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa em Patologia Aviária
  • Eduardo Cesar Tondo Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Instituto de Ciências e Tecnologia de Alimentos
  • Luciana Ruschel dos Santos Universidade de Passo Fundo, Medicina Veterinária
  • Laura Beatriz Rodrigues Universidade de Passo Fundo, Medicina Veterinária
  • Vladimir Pinheiro do Nascimento Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Veterinária, Centro de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa em Patologia Aviária
Keywords: Salmonellosis, Salmonella Heidelberg, Poultry, PCR, Virulence genes

Abstract

During the last years, Brazilian government control programs have detected an increase of Salmonella Heidelberg in poultry slaughterhouses a condition that poses a threat to human health However, the reasons remain unclear. Differences in genetic virulence profiles may be a possible justification. In addition, effective control of Salmonella is related to an efficient epidemiological surveillance system through genotyping techniques. In this context, the aim of this study was the detection of 24 virulence-associated genes in 126 S. Heidelberg isolates. We classified the isolates into 56 different genetic profiles. None of the isolates presented all the virulence genes. The prevalence of these genes was high in all tested samples as the lowest number of genes detected in one isolate was 10/24. The lpfA and csgA (fimbriae), invA and sivH (TTSS), and msgA and tolC (intracellular survival) genes were present in 100% of the isolates analyzed. Genes encoding effector proteins were detected in the majority of SH isolates. No single isolate had the sefA gene. The pefA gene was found in only four isolates. We have also performed a screening of genes associated with iron metabolism: 88.9% of isolates had the iroN geneand 79.4% the sitC gene. Although all the isolates belong to the same serotype, several genotypic profiles were observed. These findings suggest that there is a diversity of S. Heidelberg isolates in poultry products. The fact that a single predominant profile was not found in this study indicates the presence of variable sources of contamination caused by SH. The detection of genetic profiles of Salmonella strains can be used to determine the virulence patterns of SH isolates.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2019-09-18
How to Cite
Webber, B., Borges, K., Furian, T., Rizzo, N., Tondo, E., Santos, L., Rodrigues, L., & Nascimento, V. (2019). Detection of virulence genes in Salmonella Heidelberg isolated from chicken carcasses. Revista Do Instituto De Medicina Tropical De São Paulo, 61, e36. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-9946201961036
Section
Original Articles

INTRODUCTION

Salmonella spp. is one of the main pathogens causing foodborne bacterial infections in humans and poultry products are the main sources of bacterial contamination1 . The presence of this microbiological hazard affects negatively the poultry industry. Brazilian products of avian origin are exported to five continents. These poultry products should meet certain sanitary requirements of control and certification in order for this trade to occur properly. The control of Salmonella spp. in slaughterhouses is strict. In addition to having its relevance as a cause of foodborne disease, this bacterial pathogen has a major economic impact causing great losses to the domestic market and to export as well2 .

It is worth mentioning that the performance of the Brazilian government in programs aimed to control S. enteritidis and S. typhimurium in food processing led to the reduction of their prevalences. In contrast, during the last couple of years there has been an increase in the prevalence of other serotypes, as Salmonella Heidelberg (SH). SH is one of the most widely distributed serotypes worldwide and is among the ten Salmonella serotypes most frequently associated with human diseases3 , 4 . In a retrospective study spanning three decades (between 1962 and 1991) carried out in Brazil, S. Heidelberg was identified in birds and poultry products5 . According to the Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed Safety Alerts (RASFF), S. Heidelberg was among the serotypes most often isolated in the years 2013, 2014, and 20166 .

The successful control of this microorganism is also related to efficient national epidemiological surveillance systems using genotyping and phenotyping techniques. This methodology helps to study characteristics of the various serotypes of Salmonella as the ability and the way the pathogen adapts to the host and to the environment, depending on the virulence of each strain. Among the Salmonella that cause foodborne infections in humans, S. Heidelberg has been shown to be more invasive compared to other serotypes that cause gastroenteritis. Systemic disease occurs in approximately 13% of the cases of S. Heidelberg infections7 , 8 .

S. Heidelberg’s increasing importance is due to the frequent development of resistance to antimicrobial drugs, limiting treatment options in cases of salmonellosis9 and leading to a number of studies on this subject, carried out by many researchers around the world. The main issues are closely related to the pathogenicity of the microorganisms as they depend on a number of factors, including virulence factors of each strain, the serotype involved, the amount of inoculum, virulence factors expressed by the microorganism and the immunological status of the host. Therefore, Salmonella spp. may cause a broad spectrum of clinical diseases that vary in severity ranging from a mild gastrointestinal infection to a severe systemic illnesses10 .

Virulence factors are encoded by a number of genes located on the bacterium own chromosome, the so-called housekeeping genes, which give specific and basic characteristics to bacteria from the same family. These genes can be found in the so-called pathogenicity islands, or in mobile genetic elements such as transposons, plasmids and bacteriophages11 - 13 . These genes confer advantages for bacteria such as adaptation to the host cell, resistance to antimicrobials and the ability to overcome host defense mechanisms.

The increase in the occurrence of SH in food products and in SH-related infections is of concern to Brazilian authorities, since SH control and elimination from poultry farms is a major problem (data not shown). Changes in the acquisition of genes by SH strains have been reported in other animal species and have been considered as important factors that may have contributed to the increase of virulence14 . In this context, the present study aimed to screen the 24 genes associated with virulence of SH isolates by polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial isolates

The present study was carried out at the Laboratory of Bacteriology and Mycology, Veterinary Hospital of the Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF) and Centro de Diagnostico e Pesquisa em Patologia Aviaria (CDPA) of the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS). A total of 126 Salmonella Heidelberg isolates from chilled and frozen chicken carcasses collected in 2015 in a poultry slaughterhouse and serotyped at the Osvaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil, were used in this study. These samples were kindly provided by Eduardo Cesar Tondo from the Institute of Food Science and Technology (ICTA) at UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. Samples were stored at -20 °C in a Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) broth with 20% glycerol. All stored isolates were reactivated and re-identified biochemically and serologically.

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

The molecular characterization of the 126 isolates of S. Heidelberg consisted of screening 24 genes involved in the virulence and pathogenicity of Salmonella spp. The following genes were screened in this study: invA, hilA, lpfA, lpfC, sefA, csgA [ agfA ] , spvB, pefA, sopE, avrA, sivH, orgA, prgH, spaN, tolC, sipB, sitC, pagC, msgA, spiA, iroN, sopB, cdtB and sifA . DNA extraction was carried out through a heat treatment15 . Only samples with at least 10 ng of DNA were subjected to amplification. The method used was adapted from the technique published by Borges et al. 15 . Amplifications were performed in a MaxPro Swift thermocycler (Esco, Singapore) and afterwards electrophoresis was performed in 1.5% agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide. The analysis of the amplified products was performed by the visualization of the corresponding bands under ultraviolet light using a transilluminator (MacroVue, Pharmacia LKB Biotechnologies, Uppsala, Sweden) coupled to digital photodocumentation of these bands/transilluminated gels (Alpha Innotche, San Leandro, USA). The sequence of primers, as well as the size of amplicons and the reference of protocols for detection of each gene are presented in Table 1 . Cycling conditions and reaction mixtures (25 µL of total volume) were previously described16 . Standard strains of Mannheimia haemolytica (ATCC 29694) and Salmonella enteritidis (ATCC 13076) were used as negative and positive control, respectively. PCR assays were repeated three times.

Table 1:
Salmonella spp. virulence genes (n=24), sequence of primers to amplify Salmonella Heidelberg virulence genes, the amplicons’ molecular weight (in base pairs) and the corresponding references.
Genes Primers sequences (5’-3’) Base pair (bp) References
lpfC GCCCCGCCTGAAGCCTGTGTTGC AGGTCGCCGCTGTTTGAGGTTGGATA 641 26
spvB CTATCAGCCCCGCACGGAGAGCAGTTTTTA GGAGGAGGCGGTGGCGGTGGCATCATA 717 26
pefA GCGCCGCTCAGCCGAACCAG GCAGCAGAAGCCCAGGAAACAGTG 157 26
orgA CAGCGCTGGGGATTACCGTTTTG TTTTTGGCAATGCATCAGGGAACA 255 26
prgH GCCCGAGCAGCCTGAGAAGTTAGAAA TGAAATGAGCGCCCCTTGAGCCAGTC 756 26
spaN AAAAGCCGTGGAATCCGTTAGTGAAGT CAGCGCTGGGGATTACCGTTTTG 504 26
tolC TACCCAGGCGCAAAAAGAGGCTATC CCGCGTTATCCAGGTTGTTGC 161 26
sipB GGACGCCGCCCGGGAAAAACTCTC ACACTCCCGTCGCCGCCTTCACAA 875 26
sitC CAGTATATGCTCAACGCGATGTGGGTCTCC CGGGGCGAAAATAAAGGCTGTGATGAAC 768 26
pagC CGCCTTTTCCGTGGGGTATGC GAAGCCGTTTATTTTTGTAGAGGAGATGTT 454 26
msgA GCCAGGCGCACGCGAAATCATCC GCGACCAGCCACATATCAGCCTCTTCAAAC 189 26
spiA CCAGGGGTCGTTAGTGTATTGCGTGAGATG CGCGTAACAAAGAACCCGTAGTGATGGATT 550 26
iroN CCGCGTTATCCAGGTTGTTGC ACTGGCACGGCTCGCTGTCGCTCTAT 1205 26
sopB CGGACCGGCCAGCAACAAAACAAGAAGAAG TAGTGATGCCCGTTATGCGTGAGTGTATT 220 26
cdtB ACAACTGTCGCATCTCGCCCCGTCATT CAATTTGCGTGGGTTCTGTAGGTGCGAGT 268 26
sifA TTTGCCGAACGCGCCCCCACACG GTTGCCTTTTCTTGCGCTTTCCACCCATCT 449 26
lpfA CTTTCGCTGCTGAATCTGGT CAGTGTTAACAGAAACCAGT 250 29
csgA (agfA) TCCACAATGGGGCGGCGGCG CCTGACGCACCATTACGCTG 350 30
sefA GATACTGCTGAACGTAGAAGG GCGTAAATCAGCATCTGCAGTAGC 488 31
invA GTGAAATTATCGCCACGTTCGGGCAA TCATCGCACCGTCAAAGGAACC 284 31
hilA CTGCCGCAGTGTTAAGGATA CTGTCGCCTTAATCGCATGT 497 32
avrA GTTATGGACGGAACGACATCGG ATTCTGCTTCCCGCCGCC 385 33
sopE ACACACTTTCACCGAGGAAGCG GGATGCCTTCTGATGTTGACTGG 398 33
sivH CAGAATGCGAATCCTTCGCAC GTATGCGAACAAGCGTAACAC 763 34

RESULTS

The absolute and relative frequencies of the 24 investigated virulence-associated genes grouped according to their respective functions are shown in Table 2 . The 126 isolates of S. Heidelberg showed 56 different genotypic profiles based on the detection of genes associated with virulence and pathogenicity. It is worth noting that none of the isolates evaluated had all the 24 screened genes. However, the prevalence of these genes was high since the lowest number of genes detected in one isolate was 10/24. The lpfA and csgA (fimbriae), invA and sivH (type III secretion system) and msgA and tolC (intracellular survival) genes were present in 100% of the analyzed isolates ( Table 2 ).

Table 2:
Absolute and relative frequencies of 24 virulence genes screened by PCR in Salmonella Heidelberg isolates.
Gene Function   Gene Absolute frequencies (n=126) Relative frequencies (%)
Fimbriae   sefA 0 0
lpfA 126 100
lpfC 107 84.9
agfA 126 100
pefA 4 3.17
TTSS Structure sipB 91 72.2
invA 126 100
orgA 84 66.7
prgH 65 51.6
spaN 103 81.7
Effector protein avrA 124 98.4
sopE 112 88.9
sopB 123 97.6
sivH 126 100
sifA 108 85.7
Regulatory protein hilA 84 66,6
Survival inside cells (macrophages)   pagC 120 95.2
spiA 120 95.2
msgA 126 100
tolC 126 100
Plasmid   spvB 1 0.79
Iron metabolism   iroN 112 88.9
sitC 100 79.4
Toxins   cdtB 11 8.73

DISCUSSION

Virulence factors are encoded by a number of genes and may be located on the bacterium’s own chromosome. These molecules may be present in the so-called pathogenicity islands, or in mobile genetic elements12 , 13 . It is widely reported that when these genes are present and especially when gene expression is induced, they confer a number of advantages to bacteria.

Fimbrial virulence genes play an important role in bacterial pathogenicity since they promote bacterial binding to intestinal epithelial cells (enterocytes)17 . In the present study, the fimbrial genes sefA , lpfA , lpfC , csgA , and pefA were analyzed; 100% of the isolates had the lpfA and csgA genes ( Table 2 ). The lpfA gene encodes the major subunit of long polar fimbriae which promotes the adhesion of bacteria to the epithelial cells lining the Peyer’s patches of the intestine conferring cross-immunity between serotypes18 - 20 .

Fine aggregative fimbriae are essential to the synthesis of extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) which is involved in biofilm formation and environmental persistence. The csgA (formerly agfA) gene is one of the genes encoding the presence of these fimbriae which also have properties related to pathogenesis and auto-aggregation (increased survival), are pro-inflammatory and increase invasion of eukaryotic cells19 . The csgA gene is also associated with bacterial adhesion to various inert surfaces, including those used in food production. For this reason, it is also considered an important gene for the production of biofilms and the maintenance of the bacteria in the environment20 , 21 . Other researchers have reported a high detection frequency of the csgA gene in different serotypes of Salmonella spp.22 - 24 . Our findings corroborate theirs. Doran et al. 25 analyzed 604 strains of Salmonella belonging to different serotypes. These authors noted that 603 samples presented the csgA gene, suggesting that this gene is well conserved among serotypes.

No isolate had the sefA gene. The pefA gene was found in four isolates only ( Table 2 ). The pefA gene may be absent in some salmonellae due to the original localization of the gene, which is plasmidial. Plasmids are present in only a few serotypes of Salmonella spp.26 . It is worth mentioning that the sefA gene is considered one of the target genes for detecting and serotyping S. enteritidis 22 . The acquisition and loss of specific fimbrial operons may be one of the mechanisms by which different Salmonella serotypes have been able to adapt to an increasing number of hosts27 . Studies have shown that fimbriae have tropism by different cell types in distinct hosts. For this reason, it is possible that the absence of certain fimbriae could alter the virulence of the strain19 .

All SH (100%) presented the invA gene which is related to host recognition and internalization of the bacterium during invasion of epithelial cells. This gene is associated with the structure of TTSS (Type Three Secretion System) and is considered the main target gene for the detection of strains belonging to this genus by PCR22 , 28 . In this study, 66.6% of the SH isolates presented the hilA gene. This gene encodes the hyperinvasive protein hilA which is the main regulator of TTSS components and also encodes SPI-129 . This gene is related to the cell recognition and invasion process. Both the hilA gene and invA gene are considered target genes for the detection of the genus Salmonella 28 .

The orgA, sipB, prgH , and spaN genes are also related to the structure of these systems26 . In the SH isolates, the frequencies of the spaN gene (81.7%) and sipB (72.2%) were high, followed by other genes with lower frequencies. The spaN gene is one of the 12 genes that form a cluster associated with host invasion properties30 . Borges et al. 24 , reported the presence of orgA, sipB, prgH , and spaN genes in different Salmonella serotypes. These authors noted that the spaN gene is associated with strains isolated from poultry sources and is a potential epidemiological marker of Salmonella of avian origin.

Genes encoding the effector proteins secreted by TTSS, such as: sif A, avr A, sop E, sop B e and siv H were detected in the majority of tested SH strains ( Table 2 ). It is important to search for these genes because the detection of possible changes in the repertoire of the resulting proteins can mean changes in the ability of Salmonella serotypes to adapt to new hosts, allowing them to become emergent and may be related to the appearance of salmonellosis outbreaks31 .

In order to assess survival rate and inside cells, especially the ability to survive within macrophages, the following genes were investigated in our study: msgA, spiA, pagC, and tolC . We detected the msgA and tolC genes in 100% of the tested isolates (126 SH samples). The pagC and spiA genes were detected in 95.2% of the analyzed specimens ( Table 2 ). It is worth mentioning that the spiA gene is also related to the ability of the isolates to produce biofilms. Our findings corroborate those published by Borges et al. 24 who detected the presence of the msgA gene in 100% of the tested samples whereas the spiA and pagC genes showed a frequency of 93.8% in these samples. Rizzo et al. 23 detected the genes msgA, spiA, tolC and pagC in all of the Salmonella Gallinarum strains.

Only one SH isolate had the spvB gene (0.79%). This gene is of plasmid origin, is associated with the Salmonella virulence plasmid and is responsible for the maintenance and bacterial survival within the cell31 . The low frequency of this gene was expected among SH, since the presence of plasmids in Salmonella is closely related to the involved serotype. Its detection is more common in serotype Enteritidis32 , 33 . According to Rizzo et al .23 the spvB gene was expressed in 80% (12/15) of the serotype Gallinarum samples tested showing that this gene may also be common to other serotypes. DNA extraction by heat treatment could have interfered with the detection of this gene. However, the use of DNA samples extracted through commercial kits presented similar results (unpublished data).

In the present study, we investigated genes associated with iron metabolism, including the iroN gene and the sitC gene. Of the analyzed SH isolates, 88.9% presented the iroN gene whereas 79.4% had the sitC gene ( Table 2 ). Bacteria rely on a number of mechanisms and molecules to acquire iron for survival. The sitC gene encodes membrane proteins in bacterial cell which are associated with iron uptake. In contrast, iroN gene encodes proteins that function as receptors of siderophores26 , 34 . After cell invasion, Salmonella spp. finds an environment with restricted amount of iron, an essential element for their survival and growth within the host cell26 , 34 . Consequently, bacteria have developed a variety of iron procurement systems, which are generally redundant and are not simultaneously expressed. For this reason, the absence of these genes is unlikely to be a problem for the survival and multiplication of Salmonella within the host cell. The iroN gene is positively associated with the serotype Heidelberg24 . According to the study carried out by Borges et al .24 , in which different Salmonella serotypes were analyzed, the absence of the i roN gene and the presence of the spaN gene are associated with bacterial strains from poultry sources.

The cdtB gene is one of the genes encoding toxins that induce apoptosis of infected cells. Of the tested isolates, only 11 (8.7%) had this gene. The finding of a low frequency cdtB gene is in agreement with previous studies in which different serotypes of Salmonella spp. were analyzed23 , 24 . According to the published literature, this gene is possibly restricted to some serotypes of Salmonella spp26 .

Some results were unexpected, such as the low frequency of hilA, orgA and prgH genes, presenting differences in relation to the molecular profiles found in SH strains isolated in Brazil between 1996 and 200624 . Gene frequency variation and genetic profile may be influencing the survival and multiplication capacity of the strains over the years, subsequently leading to an increase in the frequency of this serotype isolated from poultry sources in Southern Brazil. Aravena et al. 27 analyzed SH strains isolated in Chile between 2006 and 2011 and did not observe these variations. However, Antony et al .14 detected the operon safABCD in strains isolated in USA between 2009 and 2017. This operon has been previously described as absent in this serotype14 . These results support the theory that modification in genetic profile of circulating SH strains are a possible reason for the increased detection of this particular serotype. Further studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis. A preliminary analysis performed by our laboratory (data not shown) demonstrated that strains isolated in Brazil in 2016 and 2017 presented a greater genetic variability when compared to those isolated until 200628 . In more recent isolates, two new ribotypes were identified. The emergence of two new ribotypes may indicate a trend in changing circulating clones, which could be one of the reasons for the increased frequency of this serotype isolation28 .

The knowledge on Salmonella serotypes and detection of genetic profiles of these bacterial pathogens can be used to determine different virulence patterns of isolates. These data allow a better understanding of the characteristics of each serotype and the establishment of criteria to predict the virulence of these microorganisms. The information generated in these studies would help and improve Salmonella control strategies in the food industry, as well as the control measures for the prevention of salmonellosis in humans.

In the present study, we noted that among the isolates of S. Heidelberg tested there are genotypic profile differences. This finding suggests the presence of a great diversity of S. Heidelberg isolates in poultry products. The fact that a single predominant profile was not found in our survey indicates that there are a variety of S. Heidelberg contamination sources in the food industry.

Acknowledgements

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors of this manuscript gratefully acknowledges Eduardo Cesar Tondo from the Institute of Food Science and Technology (ICTA) at UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil who kindly provided the Salmonella Heidelberg samples for this study.

REFERENCES

  1. , , , , , .. Aug 10-14.
  2. (). . 2017: relatório anual. http://abpa-br.com.br/storage/files/3678c_final_abpa_relatorio_anual_2016_portugues_web_reduzido.pdf
  3. , (). . . Paris: WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Salmonella. .
  4. (). . National Enteric Disease Surveillance: Salmonella annual report, 2013. https://www.cdc.gov/nationalsurveillance/pdfs/salmonella-annual-report-2013-508c.pdf
  5. , , (). Prevalência de sorovares de Salmonella isolados de aves no Brasil. Pesq Vet Bras 17, 55-62.
  6. (). . RASFF annual report 2016. https://ec.europa.eu/food/sites/food/files/safety/docs/rasff_annual_report_2016.pdf
  7. , , , , , (). Salmonellosis outcomes differ substantially by serotype. J Infect Dis 198, 109-114.
  8. , , , , , (). Ceftiofur resistance in Salmonella enterica serotype Heidelberg from chicken meat and humans, Canada. Emerg Infect Dis 16, 48-54.
  9. (). . Salmonella Heidelberg : ceftiofur-related resistance in human and retail chicken isolates. http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/cipars-picra/heidelberg/pdf/heidelberg_e.pdf
  10. , , (). Antimicrobial resistance and virulence: a successful or deleterious association in the bacterial world?. Clin Microbiol Rev 26, 185-230.
  11. , (). Pathogenicity islands: bacterial evolution in quantum leaps. Cell 87, 791-794.
  12. , , , (). Salmonella pathogenicity islands: big virulence in small packages. Microbes Infect (2)145-156.
  13. , (). Distribution of “classic” virulence factors among Salmonella spp. FEMS Immun Med Microbiol 44, 251-259.
  14. , , , , , (). Genome divergence and increased virulence of outbreak associated Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serotype Heidelberg. Gut Pathog 10
  15. , , , , , (). Spread of a major clone of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis in poultry and in salmonellosis outbreaks in Southern Brazil. J Food Prot 80, 158-163.
  16. , , , , , (). Phenotypic and molecular characterization of Salmonella Enteritidis SE86 isolated from poultry and salmonellosis outbreaks. Foodborne Pathog Dis 14, 742-754.
  17. , , , (). Multiple fimbrial adhesions are required for full virulence of Salmonella Typhimurium in mice. Infect Immun 66, 2803-2808.
  18. , (). Functional conservation among members of the Salmonella Typhimurium invA family of proteins. Infect Immun 63, 729-732.
  19. , (). Molecular basis of the interaction of Salmonella with the intestinal mucosa. Clin Microbiol Rev 12, 405-428.
  20. , , , (). AgfC and AgfE facilitate extracellular thin aggregative fimbriae synthesis in Salmonella enteritidis. Microbiology 153, 1131-1140.
  21. , , , (). Thin aggregative fimbriae enhance Salmonella enteritidis biofilm formation. FEMS Microbiol Lett 162, 295-301.
  22. , , , , , (). Detection of virulence-associated genes in Salmonella Enteritidis isolates from chicken in South of Brazil. Pesq Vet Bras 33, 1416-1422.
  23. , , , , , ..
  24. , , , , , (). Antimicrobial resistance and molecular characterization of Salmonella enterica serotypes isolated from poultry sources in Brazil. Braz J Poult Sci 21eRBCA-2019-0827
  25. , , , , , (). Diagnostic potential of sefA DNA probes to Salmonella enteritidis and certain other O-serogroup D1 Salmonella serotypes. Mol Cell Probes 10, 233-246.
  26. , , (). Virulence genotyping of Salmonella spp. with multiplex PCR. Avian Dis 50, 77-81.
  27. , , , , , (). Caracterización de cepas clínicas y ambientales de Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Heidelberg aisladas en Chile. Rev Med Chile 147, 24-33.
  28. , , , , , ..
  29. , (). Identification and sequence analysis of lpfABCDE, a putative fimbrial operon of Salmonella typhimurium. J Bacteriol 177, 2087-2097.
  30. , , , , , (). DNA-based diagnostic tests for Salmonella species targeting agfA, the structural gene for thin, aggregative fimbriae. J Clin Microbiol 31, 2263-2273.
  31. , , , , , (). Detection and identification of Salmonella from poultry-related samples by PCR. Vet Microbiol 87, 25-35.
  32. , , , (). PCR detection of Salmonella enterica serotype Montevideo in and on raw tomatoes using primers derived from hilA. Appl Environ Microbiol 66, 5248-5252.
  33. , , , , , (). Molecular properties of Salmonella enterica serotype paratyphi B distinguish between its systemic and its enteric pathovars. J Clin Microbiol 41, 4270-4278.
  34. , , , , , (). Molecular and phenotypic analysis of the CS54 island of Salmonella enterica serotype typhimurium: identification of intestinal colonization and persistence determinants. Infect Immun 71, 629-640.