In vitro susceptibility pattern of Rhodococcus equi isolated from patients to antimicrobials recommended exclusively to humans, to domestic animals and to both

Authors

  • Nícolas Garcia Ribeiro Fundação Educacional do Município de Assis, Faculdade de Medicina, Assis, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Paulo da Silva https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4647-5602
  • Patrick Júnior de Lima Paz Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Departamento de Produção Animal e Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5775-567X
  • Marcelo Fagali Arabe Filho Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Departamento de Produção Animal e Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2557-441X
  • Fernando Paganini Listoni Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Departamento de Produção Animal e Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Evandro Paganini Listoni Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Departamento de Produção Animal e Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Letícia Colin Panegossi Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Departamento de Produção Animal e Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Márcio Garcia Ribeiro Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Departamento de Produção Animal e Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2682-9389

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/

Keywords:

Human rhodococcosis, Multidrug-resistant bacteria, Molecular diagnosis, MALDI-TOF MS

Abstract

Rhodococcus equi is an opportunistic soil-borne bacterium that is eliminated in feces of multi-host animals. An increase in multidrug-resistant R. equi isolates has been reported in humans and domestic animals, and it has been hypothesized that the treatment of R. equi in foals could increase the selective pressure on multidrug-resistant isolates and favor human infections by resistant isolates. We investigated the in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility/resistance of 41 R. equi strains from humans, which were isolated from patients with pulmonary signs, using 19 antimicrobials from 10 distinct classes, recommended exclusively to humans, recommended exclusively to domestic animals and used in both. All isolates were subjected to mass spectrometry and identified as R. equi. Among the antimicrobials used exclusively in humans, tigecycline and vancomycin showed 100% efficacy. Amikacin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, imipenem, levofloxacin, clarithromycin, rifampin, ciprofloxacin, and gentamicin, used in both humans and animals, revealed high efficacy (97–100%). Conversely, a higher frequency of isolates was resistant to penicillin (87.8%) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (43.9%), which are used in both humans and animals. Among the antimicrobials used only in animals, isolates were resistant to florfenicol (46.4%), ceftiofur (17.1%), and enrofloxacin (2.5%). Multidrug resistance was observed in 34% of isolates. The identification of drug-resistant R. equi isolated from humans used exclusively in animals is circumstantial evidence of the pathogen transmission from domestic animals to humans. This study contributes to the molecular identification of Rhodococcus species from humans and to the epidemiological vigilance of the multidrug-resistant isolates.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-10

Issue

Section

Original Article

Funding data

How to Cite

Ribeiro, N. G., Silva, P. da, Paz, P. J. de L., Arabe Filho, M. F., Listoni, F. P., Listoni, E. P., Panegossi, L. C., & Ribeiro, M. G. (2025). In vitro susceptibility pattern of Rhodococcus equi isolated from patients to antimicrobials recommended exclusively to humans, to domestic animals and to both. Revista Do Instituto De Medicina Tropical De São Paulo, 67, e03. https://doi.org/10.1590/