Research impact – How to deal with it? Editorial impact series part 3
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior [CAPES]. (2019). GT impacto e relevância econômica e social: Relatorio final de atividades, Brasília, DF: CAPES.
Derrick, G. E., & Samuel, G. N. (2016). The evaluation scale: Exploring decisions about societal impact in peer review panels. Minerva, 54(1), 75–97. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-016-9290-0.
Derrick, G., & Samuel, G. (2017). The future of societal impact assessment using peer review: preevaluation training, consensus building and inter-reviewer reliability. Palgrave Communications, 3(1), 1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2017.40.
Edwards, D. M., & Meagher, L. R. (2020). A framework to evaluate the impacts of research on policy and practice: a forestry pilot study. Forest Policy and Economics, 114, 101975 doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101975.
George, G., Howard-Grenville, J., Joshi, A., & Tihanyi, L. (2016). Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6), 1880–1895. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.4007.
Gunn, A., & Mintrom, M. (2017). Evaluating the non-academic impact of academic research: design considerations. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 39(1), 20–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2016.1254429.
Hourneaux Junior, F. (2020). Eight factors for desk-review rejection at RAUSP’s management journal. RAUSP Management Journal, 55(2), 123–125. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-04-2020-151.
Hourneaux Junior, F., & Sandes-Guimarães, L. (2020). Research impact – how to evaluate it? Editorial impact series part 2. RAUSP Management Journal, 55(4), 427–433. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-10-2020-227.
Hughes, T., Webber, D., & O’Regan, N. (2019). Achieving wider impact in business and management: Analysing the case studies from REF 2014. Studies in Higher Education, 44(4), 628 doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1393059.
Impact Scholar Community. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.impactscholarcommunity.com/
McKenna, H. P. (2021). Research impact: Guidance on advancement, achievement and assessment, Cham: Springer Nature. available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57028-6
Meagher, L., Lyall, C., & Nutley, S. (2008). Flows of knowledge, expertise and influence: a method for assessing policy and practice impacts from social science research. Research Evaluation, 17(3), 163–173. doi: https://doi.org/10.3152/095820208X331720.
Metricas.edu. (2020). Projeto de pesquisa em políticas públicas. Retrieved from https://metricas.usp.br/
Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações e Comunicações [MCTIC]. (2020). Portaria N° 1.122, de 19 de março de 2020, diario oficial da união, edição 57, seção 1, página 19.
Morgan Jones, M., Manville, C., & Chataway, J. (2017). Learning from the UK’s research impact assessment exercise: a case study of a retrospective impact assessment exercise and questions for the future. The Journal of Technology Transfer, doi: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9608-6.
Morton, S. (2015). Progressing research impact assessment: a “contributions” approach. Research Evaluation, 24(4), 405–419. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv016.
Penfield, T., Baker, M. J., Scoble, R., & Wykes, M. C. (2014). Assessment, evaluations, and definitions of research impact: a review. Research Evaluation, 23(1), 21–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvt021.
Reichard, B., Reed, M. S., Chubb, J., Hall, G., Jowett, L., Peart, A., & Whittle, A. (2020). Writing impact case studies: a comparative study of high-scoring and low-scoring case studies from REF2014. Palgrave Communications, 6(1), doi: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0394-7.
Editorial 7 Research Excellence Framework [REF]. (2014). About the REF. Retrieved from www.ref.ac.uk/2014/about/Research Excellence Framework [REF]. (2019). REF 2021: Panel criteria and working methods.Retrieved from www.ref.ac.uk/publications/panel-criteria-and-working-methods-201902/
Riley, B. L., Kernoghan, A., Stockton, L., Montague, S., Yessis, J., & Willis, C. D. (2018). Using contribution analysis to evaluate the impacts of research on policy: Getting to ‘good enough. ‘ Research Evaluation, 27(1), 16–27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvx037. Responsible Research for Business and Management [RRBM]. (2020). Principles of responsible science. Retrieved from www.rrbm.network/position-paper/principles-of-responsible-science/
Samuel, G. N., & Derrick, G. E. (2015). Societal impact evaluation: Exploring evaluator perceptions of the characterisation of impact under the REF2014. Research Evaluation, 24(3), 229–241. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv007.
Sandes-Guimarães, L., & Hourneaux Junior, F. (2020). Research impact – what is it, after all? Editorial impact series part 1. RAUSP Management Journal, 55(3), 283–288. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-07-2020-202.
Universities UK. (2020). Impact of universities. Retrieved from www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/facts-andstats/Pages/impact-of-higher-education.aspx
Copyright (c) 2021 Luisa Veras de Sandes-Guimarães, Flavio Hourneaux Junior
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Management Department of the School of Economics, Management and Accounting of the University of São Paulo.
The publication of article segments is allowed, subject to prior authorization and source identification.
Copyright is regulated under Licença Creative Commons Attribution