Repertory Grid Technique and Honey’s Content Analysis: gathering and processing qualitative data
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1108/rausp-11-2022-0249Keywords:
Repertory grid technique, Honey’s content analysis, Structured interview, Case study, Interorganizational governance mechanismsAbstract
PurposeThis study aims to demonstrate a rigorous approach to applying the Repertory Grid Technique (RGT) and Honey’s Content Analysis (HCA) to obtain and process qualitative data through structured interviews.
Design/methodology/approachAn illustrative case study using the OpenRepGrid package from the open-source software R facilitates a deeper understanding of these techniques. The study subjects were employees of a corporate charter company.
FindingsThe RGT enables the identification of key attributes as perceived by interviewees regarding the phenomenon, whereas HCA clarifies how these attributes impact the desired analysis outcome. The presented case study identified constructs related to the client–supplier relationship and their impact on service performance from the provider’s perspective.
Research limitations/implicationsThis study illustrates the use of qualitative methods based on an interpretative naturalistic approach to rigorously and systematically capture interviewees’ perspectives.
Practical implicationsThe combination of RGT and HCA can be a valuable tool for management studies by allowing controlled researcher interference in empirical investigations. In addition, the data-driven selection of constructs by interviewees can lead to the emergence of novel theories.
Social implicationsUsing diverse methodologies enables researchers to address complex managerial challenges that often surpass the capabilities of conventional analysis methods.
Originality/valueThe proposed methodology offers a robust understanding of phenomena from the interviewees’ perspectives. Consequently, this study highlights the potential of these techniques for theoretical and empirical research in the field of administration.
Downloads
References
Aiman-Smith, L., Scullen, S. E., & Barr, S. H. (2002). Conducting studies of decision making in organizational contexts: A tutorial for policy-capturing and other regression-based techniques. Organizational Research Methods, 5(4), 388–414, 10.1177/109442802237117.
Alexander, P., Van Loggerenberg, J., Lotriet, H., & Phahlamohlaka, J. (2010). The use of the repertory grid for collaboration and reflection in a research context. Group Decision and Negotiation, 19(5), 479–504, 10.1007/s10726-008-9132-z.
Allard-Poesi, F. (2005). The paradox of sensemaking in organizational analysis. Organization, 12(2), 169–196, 10.1177/1350508405051187.
Alvim, B. (1984). Análise do Desempenho do Transporte Coletivo por Ônibus Fretado. (Master’s dissertation). Military Institute of Engineering, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Creswell, J., & Poth, C. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches, SAGE Publications.
Croux, C., & Dehon, C. (2010). Influence functions of the Spearman and Kendall correlation measures. Statistical Methods & Applications, 19(4), 497–515, 10.1007/s10260-010-0142-z.
Easterby‐Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Holman, D. (1996). Using repertory grids in management. Journal of European Industrial Training, 20(3), 3–30, 10.1108/03090599610114138.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32, 10.5465/amj.2007.24160888.
Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research, 4th ed., Sage Publications.
Gephart, R. P., Jr, (2004). Qualitative research and the academy of management journal. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 454–462, 10.5465/amj.2004.14438580.
Gil, A. (2002). Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa, Atlas Publications.
Gioia, D., Corley, K., Eisenhardt, K., Feldman, M., Langley, A., Lê, J., & Welch, C. (2022). A curated debate: on using “templates” in qualitative research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 31(3), 231–252, 10.1177/10564926221098955.
Goffin, K., Raja, J. Z., Claes, B., Szwejczewski, M., & Martinez, V. (2012). Rigor in qualitative supply chain management research: Lessons from applying repertory grid technique. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 42(8/9), 804–827, 10.1108/09600031211269767.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1982). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. ECTJ, 30(4), 233–252. 10.1007/BF02765185.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research., in N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln, (Eds), Handbook of qualitative research, Sage Publications, 105–117.
Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (1997). The new language of qualitative method, Oxford University Press.
Harley, B., & Cornelissen, J. (2020). Rigor with or without templates? The pursuit of methodological rigor in qualitative research. Organizational Research Methods, 25(2), 1094428120937786, 10.1177/1094428120937786.
Honey, P. (1979). The repertory grid in action: How to use it to conduct an attitude survey. Industrial and Commercial Training, 11(11), 452–459, 10.1108/eb003756.
Huo, B., Flynn, B., & Zhao, X. (2017). Supply chain power configurations and their relationship with performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 53(2), 88–111, 10.1111/jscm.12139.
Jankowicz, D. (2001). Why does subjectivity make us nervous? Making the tacit explicit. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(1), 61–73, 10.1108/14691930110380509.
Jankowicz, D. (2004). The easy guide to repertory grids, Wiley.
Jarzabkowski, P., & Wilson, D. C. (2006). Actionable strategy knowledge. European Management Journal, 24(5), 348–367, 10.1016/j.emj.2006.05.009.
Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs, Vol. 1, London: Norton.
Kelly, G. A. (1969). Ontological acceleration (1966), in B. Maher, (Ed.), Clinical psychology and personality: Selected papers of george kellym, John Wiley, New York, NY, 7–45.
Mees-Buss, J., Welch, C., & Piekkari, R. (2020). From templates to heuristics: How and why to move beyond the gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 25(2), 10.1177/1094428120967716.
Nokes, K., & Hodgkinson, G. P. (2017). Policy-capturing: An ingenious technique for exploring the cognitive bases of work-related decisions. In Galavan, R. J., Sund, K. J., & Hodgkinson, G. P. (Eds), Methodological challenges and advances in managerial and organizational cognition, 2, 95–121, Emerald Publishing, 10.1108/S2397-52102017005.
Pratt, M. (2009). For the lack of a boilerplate: tips on writing up (and reviewing) qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal, 52(5), 856–862, 10.5465/amj.2009.44632557.
Raja, J. Z., Bourne, D., Goffin, K., Çakkol, M., & Martinez, V. (2013). Achieving customer satisfaction through integrated products and services: An exploratory study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(6), 1128–1144.
Riege, A. (2003). Validity and reliability tests in case study research: A literature review with ‘hands-on’ applications for each research phase. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 6(2), 75–86, 10.1108/13522750310470055.
Rogers, B., & Ryals, L. (2007). Using the repertory grid to access the underlying realities in key account relationships. International Journal of Market Research, 49(5), 595–612, 10.1177/147078530704900506.
Rojon, C., McDowall, A., & Saunders, M. N. K. (2018). A novel use of honey’s aggregation approach to the analysis of repertory grids. Field Methods, 31(2), 150–166, 10.1177/1525822x18806259.
Savall, H., Zardet, V., Bonnet, M., & Peron, M. (2008). The emergence of implicit criteria actually used by the reviewers of qualitative research articles: the case of a European journal. Organizational Research Methods, 11(3), 10.1177/1094428107308855.
Smith, M. (1980). An analysis of three managerial jobs using repertory grids. Journal of Management Studies, 17(2), 205–213, 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1980.tb00084.x.
Symon, G., Cassell, C., & Johnson, P. (2018). Evaluative practices in qualitative management research: A critical review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 134–154, 10.1111/ijmr.12120.
Um, K., & Oh, J. (2020). The interplay of governance mechanisms in supply chain collaboration and performance in buyer–supplier dyads: Substitutes or complements. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 40(4), 415–438, 10.1108/IJOPM-07-2019-0507.
Wright, R. P. (2016). Organizational paradoxes: When opposites cease to be opposites. In D. Winter & N., Reed, (Eds), Wiley-Blackwell handbook of personal construct psychology (chap, Vol. 25, Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex, 306–319, 10.1002/9781118508275.ch25.
Wright, R. P. (2017). Re-examining what we “anticipate” in a constructed world. In R. J. Galavan, K. J. Sund & G. P. Hodgkinson, (Eds), New horizons in managerial and organizational cognition, Vol. 2, Emerald Publishing, 219–240, 10.1108/S2397-52102017009.
Yin, R. (2001). Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos, Bookman.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Marina Bastos Carvalhais Barroso Barroso, Ricardo Silveira Martins, Jonathan Simões Freitas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Management Department of the School of Economics, Management and Accounting of the University of São Paulo.
The publication of article segments is allowed, subject to prior authorization and source identification.
Copyright is regulated under Licença Creative Commons Attribution
