Factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding in the first six months of life in Brazil: a systematic review

Authors

  • Cristiano Siqueira Boccolini Fundação Oswaldo Cruz; Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde; Laboratório de Informação em Saúde
  • Márcia Lazaro de Carvalho Fundação Oswaldo Cruz; Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública; Departamento de Epidemiologia e Métodos Quantitativos em Saúde
  • Maria Inês Couto de Oliveira Universidade Federal Fluminense; Instituto de Saúde Coletiva; Departamento de Epidemiologia e Bioestatística

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2015049005971

Keywords:

Breast Feeding, Maternal Behavior, Risk Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Review

Abstract

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To identify factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding in the first six months of life in Brazil. METHODS Systematic review of epidemiological studies conducted in Brazil with exclusive breastfeeding as outcome. Medline and LILACS databases were used. After the selection of articles, a hierarchical theoretical model was proposed according to the proximity of the variable to the outcome. RESULTS Of the 67 articles identified, we selected 20 cross-sectional studies and seven cohort studies, conducted between 1998 and 2010, comprising 77,866 children. We identified 36 factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding, being more often associated the distal factors: place of residence, maternal age and education, and the proximal factors: maternal labor, age of the child, use of a pacifier, and financing of primary health care. CONCLUSIONS The theoretical model developed may contribute to future research, and factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding may subsidize public policies on health and nutrition.

Published

2015-01-01

Issue

Section

Review

How to Cite

Boccolini, C. S., Carvalho, M. L. de, & Oliveira, M. I. C. de. (2015). Factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding in the first six months of life in Brazil: a systematic review. Revista De Saúde Pública, 49, 91. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2015049005971