Prelabor cesarean section: the role of advanced maternal age and associated factors




Cesarean Section, Maternal and Child Health, Maternal Age, Pregnancy Complications


OBJECTIVE to evaluate whether advanced maternal age (AMA) is associated with prelabor cesarean section and to identify the factors associated with prelabor cesarean section in AMA women, according to the mode of type of labor financing (private or public). METHODS Based on the Birth in Brazil survey, the research was conducted on representative sample of mothers for the country (Brazil), regions, type of hospital and location (capital or not), in 2011/2012. This study included 15,071 women from two age groups: 20–29 years and ≥ 35 years. The information was collected from interviews with puerperal woman, prenatal cards, and medical records of mothers and newborns. Multiple logistic regression modelling was used to verify the association between prelabor cesarean section and maternal, prenatal and childbirth characteristics, according to the mode of financing. RESULTS Our results showed a higher use of prelabor cesarean section for AMA (≥ 35 years) women in the public service (OR = 1.63; 95%CI 1.38–1.94) and in the private service (OR = 1.44; 95%CI 1.13–1.83), compared with women aged 20–29 years. In the adjusted model, we recorded three factors associated with the prelabor cesarean section in AMA women in both, public and private sectors: the same professional in prenatal care and childbirth (OR = 4.97 and OR = 4.66); nulliparity (OR = 6.17 and OR = 10.08), and multiparity with previous cesarean section (from OR = 5.73 to OR = 32.29). The presence of obstetric risk (OR = 1.94; 95%CI .44–2.62) also contributed to the occurrence of prelabor cesarean section in women who gave birth in the public service. CONCLUSIONS AMA was an independent risk factor for prelabor cesarean in public and private services. In the public, prelabor cesarean in AMA was more influenced by clinical criteria. Higher chance of prelabor cesarean section in nulliparous women increases the chance of cesarean section in multiparous women, as we showed in this study, which increases the risk of anomalous placental implantation.


Oakley L, Penn N, Pipi M, Oteng-Ntim E, Doyle P. Risk of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes by maternal age: quantifying individual and population level risk using routine UK maternity data. PLoS One. 2016;11(10):e0164462. [ Links ]

Claramonte Nieto M, Meler Barrabes E, Garcia Martínez S, Gutiérrez Prat M, Serra Zantop B. Impact of aging on obstetric outcomes: defining advanced maternal age in Barcelona. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):342. [ Links ]

Ludford I, Scheil W, Tucker G, Grivell R. Pregnancy outcomes for nulliparous women of advanced maternal age in South Australia, 1998-2008. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;52(3):235-41. [ Links ]

Laopaiboon M, Lumbiganon P, Intarut N, Mori R, Ganchimeg T, Vogel JP, et al. Advanced maternal age and pregnancy outcomes: a multicountry assessment. BJOG. 2014;121 Suppl 1:49-56. [ Links ]

Ministério da Saúde (BR), Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Departamento de Análise de Situação de Saúde. Sistema de Informação de Nascidos Vivos. Datasus. Brasília, DF 2018 [cited 2019 Dec 28]. Available from: [ Links ]

Wu Y, Chen Y, Shen M, Guo Y, Wen SW, Lanes A, et al. Adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes among singleton pregnancies in women of very advanced maternal age: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):3. [ Links ]

Martinelli KG, Garcia EM, Santos Neto ET, Gama SGN. Advanced maternal age and its association with placenta praevia and placental abruption: a meta-analysis. Cad Saude Publica. 2018;34(2):e00206116. [ Links ]

Rydahl E, Declercq E, Juhl M, Maimburg RD. Cesarean section on a rise -- Does advanced maternal age explain the increase? A population register-based study. PLoS One. 2019;14(1):e0210655. [ Links ]

Herstad L, Klungsoyr K, Skjaerven R, Tanbo T, Forsén L, Abyholm T, et al. Maternal age and emergency operative deliveries at term: a population-based registry study among low-risk primiparous women. BJOG. 2015;122(12):1642-51. [ Links ]

Waldenström U, Ekéus C. Risk of labor dystocia increases with maternal age irrespective of parity: a population-based register study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(9):1063-9. [ Links ]

Souza J, Gülmezoglu A, Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Carroli G, Fawole B, et al; WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health Research Group. Cesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: the 2004-2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health. BMC Med. 2010;8:71. [ Links ]

Leal MC, Esteves-Pereira AP, Nakamura-Pereira M, Domingues RMSM, Dias MAB, Moreira ME, et al. Burden of early-term birth on adverse infant outcomes: a population-based cohort study in Brazil. BMJ Open. 2017;7(12):e017789. [ Links ]

Mariani GL, Vain NE. The rising incidence and impact of non-medically indicated pre-labour cesarean section in Latin America. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;24(1):11-7. [ Links ]

Betrán AP, Temmerman M, Kingdon C, Mohiddin A, Opiyo N, Torloni MR, et al. Interventions to reduce unnecessary cesarean sections in healthy women and babies. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1358-68. [ Links ]

Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, Barros AJD, Barros FC, Juan L, et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in cesarean sections. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1341-8. [ Links ]

Vasconcellos MTL, Silva PLN, Pereira APE, Schilithz AOC, Souza Junior PRB, Szwarcwald CL. Desenho da amostra Nascer no Brasil: Pesquisa Nacional sobre Parto e Nascimento. Cad Saude Publica. 2014;30 Supl 1:S49-58. [ Links ]

Leal MC, Bittencourt SA, Esteves-Pereira AP, Ayres BVS, Silva LBRAA, Thomaz EBAF, et al. Avanços na assistência ao parto no Brasil: resultados preliminares de dois estudos avaliativos. Cad Saude Publica. 2019;35(7):e00223018. [ Links ]

Ministério da Saúde (BR), Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Departamento de Análise de Situação de Saúde. Sistema de Informação sobre Mortalidade. Datasus. Brasília, DF; 2018 [cited 2018 Nov 20]. Available from: [ Links ]

Liu X, Zhang W. Effect of maternal age on pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study. Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127(12): 2241-6. [ Links ]

Domingues RMSM, Viellas EF, Dias MAB, Torres JA, Theme-Filha MM, Gama SGN, et al. Adequação da assistência pré-natal segundo as características maternas no Brasil. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2015;37(3):140-7. [ Links ]

Leal MC, Pereira APE, Domingues RMSM, Theme Filha MM, Dias MAB, Nakamura-Pereira M, et al. Intervenções obstétricas durante o trabalho de parto e parto em mulheres brasileiras de risco habitual. Cad Saude Publica. 2014;30 Supl 1:S17-32. [ Links ]

Ayala-Peralta F, Guevara-Rios E, Rodriguez-Herrera MA, Ayala-Palomino R, Quiñones-Vásquez LA, Luna-Figueroa A, et al. Edad materna avanzada y morbilidad obstétrica. Rev Peru Investig Materno Perinat. 2016;5(2):9-15. [ Links ]

Wang Y, Tanbo T, Åbyholm T, Henriksen T. The impact of advanced maternal age and parity on obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton gestations. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;284(1):31-7. [ Links ]

Nakamura-Pereira M, Leal MC, Esteves-Pereira AP, Domingues RMSM, Torres JA, Dias MAB, et al. Use of Robson classification to assess cesarean section rate in Brazil: the role of source of payment for childbirth. Reprod Health. 2016;13 Suppl 3:128. [ Links ]

Carolan M, Frankowska D. Advanced maternal age and adverse perinatal outcome: a review of the evidence. Midwifery. 2011;27(6):793-801. [ Links ]

Einarsdóttir K, Bogadóttir HÝ, Bjarnadóttir RI, Steingrímsdóttir Þ. The effect of maternal age on obstetric interventions in a low-risk population. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018;63(5):526-31. [ Links ]

Bayrampour H, Heaman M. Comparison of demographic and obstetric characteristics of Canadian primiparous women of advanced maternal age and younger age. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011;33(8):820-9. [ Links ]

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 205 Summary: vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(2):393-5. [ Links ]

Nakamura-Pereira M, Esteves-Pereira AP, Gama SGN, Leal M. Elective repeat cesarean delivery in women eligible for trial of labor in Brazil. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2018;143(3):351-9. [ Links ]

Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang JJ, Gülmezoglu AM; WHO Working Group on Cesarean Section. WHO Statement on Cesarean Section Rates. BJOG. 2016;123(5):667-70. [ Links ]




How to Cite

Martinelli, K. G. ., Gama, S. G. N. da ., Almeida, A. H. do V. de, Nakamura-Pereira, M., & Santos Neto, E. T. dos. (2021). Prelabor cesarean section: the role of advanced maternal age and associated factors. Revista De Saúde Pública, 55, 9.



Original Articles

Funding data