Evolution of care during pregnancy and childbirth in the extreme south of Brazil

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055003128

Keywords:

Prenatal Care, trends, Maternal-Child Health Services, Reproductive Health Services, Birthing Centers, methods, Program Evaluation

Abstract

OBJECTIVES To describe the evolution of care during pregnancy and childbirth among postpartum women living in the municipality of Rio Grande, Southern Brazil, using data from surveys carried out every three years between 2007 and 2019. METHODS Within 48 hours after delivery, a single, standardized questionnaire was applied to all mothers who had children in local hospitals and met the inclusion criteria. Demographic and reproductive characteristics, lifestyle habits, socioeconomic level of the family, and care received during pregnancy and childbirth were investigated. In the analysis, the chi-square test for linear trend was used to assess the distribution of indicators per survey. RESULTS A total of 12,645 parturients were interviewed (98% of the women eligible to participate in the surveys). In the period evaluated, the proportion of births fell 35% among adolescents and increased 25% among women aged 35 years and over. Mothers gained, on average, two years of schooling, and their families experienced an important economic improvement, followed by loss of income in the last survey. Maternal smoking, before and during pregnancy, fell by half. The rate of mothers who started prenatal care in the first trimester and the number of consultations and laboratory tests increased. Almost 60% of prenatal consultations and 80% of births took place in the Brazilian Unified Health System. In 2019, vaginal delivery was once again the most common. The rates of low birth weight (9%) and prematurity (17%) virtually remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS We found an important change in the reproductive profile and increased coverage of various prenatal care and delivery services. Children continue to be born well, but low birth weight and prematurity remain endemic.

References

World Health Organization. WHO Recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Geneva (CH): WHO; 2016. [ Links ]

Ministério da Saúde (BR), Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde, Departamento de Atenção Básica. Atenção ao pré-natal de baixo risco. Brasília, DF; 2012. (Série A. Normas e Manuais Técnicos); (Cadernos de Atenção Básica; Nº 32). [ Links ]

Leal MC, Szwarcwald CL, Almeida PVB, Aquino EML, Barreto ML, Barros FC, et al. Reproductive, maternal, neonatal and child health in the 30 years since the creation of the Unified Health System (SUS). Cienc Saude Coletiva. 2018;23(6):1915-28. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018236.03942018 [ Links ]

Leal MC, Esteves-Pereira AP, Viellas EF, Domingues RMSM, Gama SGN. Prenatal care in the Brazilian public sector. Rev Saude Publica. 2020;54:8. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001458 [ Links ]

Mario DN, Rigo L, Boclin KLS, Malvestio LMM, Anziliero D, Horta BL, et al. Quality of prenatal care in Brazil: National Health Research 2013. Cienc Saude Coletiva. 2019;24(3):1223-32. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018243.13122017 [ Links ]

Barros AJD, Victora CG, Horta BL, Wehrmeister FC, Bassani D, Silveira MF, et al. Antenatal care and cesarean sections: trends and inequalities in four population- based birth cohorts in Pelotas, Brazil, 1982–2015. Int J Epidemiol. 2019;48 Suppl1:i37-i45. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyy211 [ Links ]

Silva AAM, Batista RFL, Simões VMF, Thomaz EBAF, Ribeiro CCC, Lamy Filho F, et al. Changes in perinatal health in two birth cohorts (1997/1998 and 2010) in São Luís, Maranhão State, Brazil. Cad Saude Publica. 2015;31(7):1437-50. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00100314 [ Links ]

Bernardes ACFB, Silva RA, Coimbra LC, Alves MTSSB, Queiroz RCS, Batista RFL, Bettiol H, et al. Inadequate prenatal care utilization and associated factors in São Luís, Brazil. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:266. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-266 [ Links ]

Victora CG, Aquino EML, Leal MC, Monteiro CA, Barros FC, Szarcwald CL, et al. Maternal and child health in Brazil: progress and challenges. Lancet. 2011;377(9780):1863-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60138-4 [ Links ]

Secretaria de Estado da Saúde do Rio Grande do Sul, Departamento de Gestão da Tecnologia da Informação. Sistema de Informação sobre Mortalidade (SIM)/Sistema de Informação sobre Nascidos Vivos (Sinasc). Porto Alegre, RS; 2020 [cited 2020 Jun 2]. Available from: http://bipublico.saude.rs.gov.br. [ Links ]

Lauritsen JM, editor. EpiData data entry, data management and basic Statistical Analysis System. Odense (DK): EpiData Association; 2000–2008 [cited 2017 Oct 20]. Available from: http://www.epidata.dk [ Links ]

Dean A, Arner T, Sunki G, Friedman R, Lantinga M, Sangam S, et al. Epi InfoTM, a database and statistics program for public health professionals. Atlanta, GA: CDC; 2011. [ Links ]

Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research Electronic data capture (REDCap): a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 [ Links ]

Stata Corp. Stata statistical software: release 11.2. College Station (TX): Stata Corporation; 2011. [ Links ]

The Lancet Adolescent Health Commission. Preventing teenage pregnancies in Brazil [editorial]. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):468. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30352-4 [ Links ]

Sociedade Civil Bem-EstarFamiliar no Brasil. Pesquisa Nacional sobre Demografia e Saúde: 1996. Rio de Janeiro: BEMFAM; 1997. [ Links ]

Tomasi E, Fernandes PAA, Fischer T, Siqueira FCV, Silveira DS, Thumé E, et al. Qualidade da atenção pré-natal na rede básica de saúde do Brasil: indicadores e desigualdades sociais. Cad Saude Publica. 2017;33(3):e00195815. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00195815 [ Links ]

Barros AJD, Victora CG, Wehrmeister FC. Desigualdades em saúde materno-infantil no Brasil: 20 anos de progresso. Pelotas, RS: Editora UFPel; 2019. [ Links ]

D’Avila APF, Bridi MA. Indústria naval brasileira e a crise recente: o caso do Polo Naval e Offshore de Rio Grande (RS). Cad Metropole. 2017;19(38):249-68. https://doi.org/10.1590/2236-9996.2017-3810 [ Links ]

Paim J, Travassos C, Almeida C, Bahia L, Macinko J. The Brazilian health system: history, advances, and challenges. Lancet. 2011;377(9779):1778-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60054-8 [ Links ]

Castro MC, Massuda A, Almeida G, Menezes-Filho NA, Andrade MV, Noronha KVMS, et al. Brazil’s unified health system: the first 30 years and prospects for the future. Lancet. 2019;394(10195):345-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31243-7 [ Links ]

World Health Organization, Division of Family Health, Maternal Health and Safe Motherhood Unit. Care in normal birth: a practical guide: report of a technical working group. Geneva (CH): WHO; 1996. [ Links ]

Leal MC, Pereira APE, Domingues RMSM, Theme Filha MM, Dias MAB, Nakamura-Pereira M, et al. Intervenções obstétricas durante o trabalho de parto e parto em mulheres brasileiras de risco habitual. Cad Saude Publica. 2014;30 Supl 1:S17-32. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00151513 [ Links ]

Ismail KMK, editor. Perineal trauma at childbirth. Cham (CH): Springer International; 2016. [ Links ]

Cunha CMP, Katz L, Lemos A, Amorim MM. Conhecimento, atitude e prática dos obstetras brasileiros em relação à episiotomia. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2019;41(11):636-46. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-3400314 [ Links ]

Silveira MF, Victora CG, Horta BL, Silva BGC, Matijasevich A, Barros FC. Low birthweight and preterm birth: trends and inequalities in four population-based birth cohorts in Pelotas, Brazil, 1982-2015. Int J Epidemiol. 2019;48 Suppl1:i46-i53. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyy106 [ Links ]

Loret de Mola C, Cardoso VC, Batista R, Gonçalves H, Saraiva MCP, Menezes AMB, et al. Maternal pregnancy smoking in three Brazilian cities: trends and differences according to education, income, and age. Int J Public Health. 2020;65(2):207-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-019-01328-8 [ Links ]

Silveira MF, Matijasevich A, Menezes AMB, Horta BL, Santos IS, Barros AJD, et al. Secular trends in smoking during pregnancy according to income and ethnic group: four population-based perinatal surveys in a Brazilian city. BMJ Open. 2016;6(2):e010127. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010127 [ Links ]

Malta DC, Stopa SR, Santos MAS, Andrade SSCA, Oliveira TP, Cristo EB et al. Evolução de indicadores do tabagismo segundo inquéritos de telefone, 2006–2014. Cad Saude Publica. 2017;33 Supl 3:e00134915. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00134915 [ Links ]

Barros FC, Bhutta ZA, Batra M, Hansen TN, Victora CG, Rubens CE; The GAPPS Review Group. Global report on preterm birth and stillbirth (3 of 7): evidence for effectiveness of interventions. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10 Suppl 1:S3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-10-S1-S3 [ Links ]

Gonzalez TN, Cesar JA. Posse e preenchimento da Caderneta da Gestante em quatro inquéritos de base populacional. Rev Bras Saude Mater Infant. 2019;19:375-82. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-93042019000200007 [ Links ]

Published

2021-08-13

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Cesar, J. A., Mendoza-Sassi, R. A. ., & Marmitt, L. P. . (2021). Evolution of care during pregnancy and childbirth in the extreme south of Brazil. Revista De Saúde Pública, 55, 50. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055003128