Trend in physical activity patterns of pregnant women living in Brazilian capitals

Authors

  • Ana Elisa Madalena Rinaldi Universidade Federal de Uberlândia. Faculdade de Medicina. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde. Uberlândia, MG, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0154-554X
  • Janaína Aparecida de Paula Universidade Federal de Uberlândia. Faculdade de Medicina. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde. Uberlândia, MG, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1034-4336
  • Maiara Aparecida Miálich Almeida Universidade Estadual Paulista. Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu. Departamento de Enfermagem. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem. Botucatu, SP, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0641-0743
  • José Eduardo Corrente Universidade Estadual Paulista. Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu. Escritório de Apoio à Pesquisa. Botucatu, SP, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5478-4996
  • Maria Antonieta Barros Leite Carvalhaes Universidade Estadual Paulista. Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu. Departamento de Enfermagem. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem. Botucatu, SP, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6695-0792

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2022056003300

Keywords:

Pregnant Women, Exercise, Leisure Activities, Socioeconomic Factors, Health Surveys

Abstract

OBJECTIVES To describe the trend of physical activity (PhA) in four domains performed by pregnant women living in Brazilian capitals and the Federal District (FD) and to verify the association between sociodemographic factors and the practice of leisure-time physical activity between 2007 and 2017. METHODS Time trend study carried out with data from the Surveillance System of Risk Factors for chronic diseases by telephone survey (Vigitel). A total of 3,730 pregnant women were interviewed in the period, considering sociodemographic variables (age, macro-region, work, marital status, schooling, skin color) and physical activity in the four domains (leisure-time, work, commuting, domestic – yes/no). For pregnant women who performed leisure-time physical activity, its duration was inquired, expressed in the variable PhA ≥ 150 minutes/week (yes/no). The time trend was evaluated by variance-weighted linear regression (average annual variation was expressed in percentage points – pp) and the association of sociodemographic factors with leisure-time physical activity by Poisson regression, with prevalence ratio (PR) estimation. RESULTS The prevalence of pregnant women with 12 years of schooling or more increased in the analyzed period (+1.37 pp/year), as well as the prevalence of pregnant women with more than 35 years of age (+1.11 pp/year) and those who work (+0.75 pp/year). The prevalence of leisure-time physical activity by pregnant women increased from 29.3% in 2007 to 37.6% in 2017 (+1.37 pp/year), and of PhA ≥ 150min/week from 2.3% to 20.6% (+2.33 pp/year), respectively, and there was a reduction in domestic physical activities from 63.9% to 38.9% (-1.65 pp/year). The prevalence of leisure-time physical activity was higher among pregnant women with more than 12 years of schooling (PR = 2.22; 95%CI: 1.73–2.84) as compared to those with less than 8 years of age, and lower among black/brown/indigenous pregnant women, compared to white/yellow ones (PR = 0.87; 95%CI: 0.78–0.97). The prevalence of PhA ≥ 150min/week increased according to years of schooling and age. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of leisure-time physical activity and its performance for ≥ 150 minutes/week increased in the analyzed period, and both were directly associated with greater schooling.

References

World Health Organization. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Geneva (CH): WHO; 2010 [citado 26 jun 2020]. Disponível em: https://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/factsheet_recommendations/en/

Physical Activity and Exercise During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 804. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(4):e178-88. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003772

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Physical activity guidelines for Americans. 2. ed. Washington, DC: DHHS; 2018 [citado 26 jun 2020]. Disponível em: https://health.gov/sites/default/files/2019-09/Physical_Activity_Guidelines_2nd_edition.pdf

Wang C, Wei Y, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Xu Q, Sun Y, et al. A randomized clinical trial of exercise during pregnancy to prevent gestational diabetes mellitus and improve pregnancy outcome in overweight and obese pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(4):340-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.037

Di Mascio D, Magro-Malosso ER, Saccone G, Marhefka GD, Berghella V. Exercise during pregnancy in normal-weight women and risk of preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(5):561-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.014

Magro-Malosso ER, Saccone G, Di Mascio D, Di Tommaso M, Berghella V. Exercise during pregnancy and risk of preterm birth in overweight and obese women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(3):263-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13087

Berghella V, Saccone G. Exercise in pregnancy! Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(4):335-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.023

Runge SB, Pedersen JK, Svendsen SW, Juhl M, Bonde JP, Andersen AMN. Occupational lifting of heavy loads and preterm birth: a study within the Danish National Birth Cohort. Occup Environ Med. 2013;70(11):782-8. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2012-101173

Waters TR, MacDonald LA, Hudock SD, Goddard DE. Provisional recommended weight limits for manual lifting during pregnancy. Hum Factors. 2014;56(1):203-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720813502223

Carvalhaes MABL, Martiniano ACA, Malta MB, Takito MY, Benício MHD. Atividade física em gestantes assistidas na atenção primária à saúde. Rev Saude Publica. 2013;47(5):958-67. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2013047004689

Domingues MR, Barros AJD. Leisure-time physical activity during pregnancy in the 2004 Pelotas Birth Cohort Study. Rev Saude Publica. 2007;41(2):173-80. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-89102007000200002

Nascimento SL, Surita FG, Godoy AC, Kasawara KT, Morais SS. Physical activity patterns and factors related to exercise during pregnancy: a cross sectional study. PloS One. 2015;10(6):e0128953. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128953

Ministério da Saúde (BR), Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde, Departamento de Atenção Básica. Atenção ao pré-natal de baixo risco. Brasília, DF: Editora do Ministério da Saúde; 2012. (Série A. Normas e Manuais Técnicos. Cadernos de Atenção Básica; n° 32).

Ministério da Saúde (BR), Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Política Nacional de Promoção da Saúde - PNaPS: revisão da Portaria MS/GM n° 687, de 30 de março de 2006. Brasília, DF; 2014.

Coll CVN, Domingues MR, Hallal PC, Silva ICM, Bassani DG, Matijasevich A, et al. Changes in leisure-time physical activity among Brazilian pregnant women: comparison between two birth cohort studies (2004–2015). BMC Public Health. 2017;17:119. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4036-y

Ministério da Saúde (BR), Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Departamento de Vigilância de Doenças e Agravos não Transmissíveis e Promoção da Saúde. Vigitel Brasil 2017: vigilância de fatores de risco e proteção para doenças crônicas por inquérito telefônico: estimativas sobre frequência e distribuição sociodemográfica de fatores de risco e proteção para doenças crônicas nas capitais dos 26 estados brasileiros e no Distrito Federal em 2017. Brasília, DF; 2018 [citado 26 jun 2020]. Disponível em: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/vigitel_brasil_2017_vigilancia_fatores_riscos.pdf

Ministério da Saúde (BR), Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Ponderação pelo método rake. Brasília, DF; [citado 26 jun 2020]. Disponível em: http://svs.aids.gov.br/bases_vigitel_viva/dic_var/vigitel/Ponderacao_Metodo-Rake.pdf

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Brasil em síntese: taxa de fecundidade total. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; c2021 [citado 26 jun 2020]. Disponível em: https://brasilemsintese.ibge.gov.br/populacao/taxas-de-fecundidade-total.html

Ministério da Saúde (BR), DATASUS. SINASC. Nascidos Vivos. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; [citado 26 jun 2020]. Disponível em: http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/deftohtm.exe?sinasc/cnv/nvbr.def

Caregnato CE, Oliven AC. Educação superior e políticas de ação afirmativa no Rio Grande do Sul: desigualdades e equidade. Educ Rev. 2017;(64):171-87. https://doi.org/10.1509/0104-4060.47764

Ainsworth B, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, et al. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(9 Suppl):S498-516. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200009001-00009

Takito MY, Benício MHD, Neri LCL. Atividade física de gestantes e desfechos ao recém-nascido: revisão sistemática. Rev Saude Publica. 2009;43(6):1059-69. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102009005000074

Waerden J, Nakamura A, Pryor L, Charles MA, El-Khoury F, Dargent-Molina P, et al. Domain-specific physical activity and sedentary behavior during pregnancy and postpartum depression risk in the French EDEN and ELFE cohorts. Prev Med. 2019;121:33-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.02.012

Ha AVV, Zhao Y, Pham NM, Nguyen CL, Nguyen PTH, Chu TK, et al. Physical activity and sedentary behaviour during pregnancy are associated with gestational weight gain in Vietnamese women. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2020;29(1):136-43. https://doi.org/10.6133/apjcn.202003_29(1).0018

Todorovic J, Terzic-Supic Z, Bjegovic-Mikanovic V, Piperac P, Dugalic S, Gojnic-Dugalic M. Factors associated with the leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) during the first trimester of the pregnancy: the cross-sectional study among pregnant women in Serbia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(4):1366. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041366

Coll CVN, Domingues MR, Gonçalves H, Bertoldi AD. Perceived barriers to leisure-time physical activity during pregnancy: a literature review of quantitative and qualitative evidence. J Sci Med Sport. 2017;20(1):17-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2016.06.007

Mudd LM, Nechuta S, Pivarnik JM, Paneth N; Michigan Alliance for National Children’s Study. Factors associated with women’s perceptions of physical activity safety during pregnancy. Prev Med. 2009;49(2-3):194-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.06.004

Lynch KE, Landsbaugh JR, Whitcomb BW, Pekow P, Markenson G, Chasan-Taber L. Physical activity of pregnant Hispanic women. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(4):434-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.06.020

Gaston A, Vamos CA. Leisure-time physical activity patterns and correlates among pregnant women in Ontario, Canada. Matern Child Health J. 2013;17(3):477-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-012-1021-z

Gaston A, Cramp A. Exercise during pregnancy: a review of patterns and determinants. J Sci Med Sport. 2011;14(4):299-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2011.02.006

Published

2022-05-27

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Rinaldi, A. E. M., Paula, J. A. de, Almeida, M. A. M., Corrente, J. E., & Carvalhaes, M. A. B. L. (2022). Trend in physical activity patterns of pregnant women living in Brazilian capitals. Revista De Saúde Pública, 56, 42. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2022056003300