Different remote realities: health and the use of territory in Brazilian rural municipalities

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2022056003914

Keywords:

Sociocultural Territory, Health policies, Rural Population Health, Health Care Models

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To characterize remote rural Brazilian municipalities according to their logic of insertion into socio-spatial dynamics, discussing the implications of these characteristics for health policies. METHODS Starting from the category of analysis – the use of the territory – a typology was elaborated, with the delimitation of six clusters. The clusters were compared using socioeconomic data and the distance in minutes to the metropolis, regional capital, and sub-regional center. Mean, standard error and standard deviation of the quantitative variables were calculated, and tests on mean differences were performed. RESULTS The six clusters identified bring together 97.2% of remote rural municipalities and were called: “Matopiba,” “Norte de Minas,” “Vetor Centro-Oeste,” “Semiárido,” “Norte Águas,” and “Norte Estradas.” Differences are observed between the clusters in the analyzed variables, indicating the existence of different realities. Remote rural municipalities of “Norte Águas” and “Norte Estradas” clusters are the most populous, the most extensive and are thousands of kilometers away from urban centers, while those in “Norte de Minas” and “Semiárido” clusters have smaller areas with a distance of about 200 km away from urban centers. The remote rural municipalities of the “Vetor Centro-Oeste” cluster, in turn, are distinguished by a dynamic economy, inserted into the world economic circuit due to the agribusiness. The Family Health Strategy is the predominant model in the organization of primary health care. CONCLUSION Remote rural municipalities are distinguished by their socio-spatial characteristics and insertion into the economic logic, demanding customized health policies. The strategy of building health regions, offering specialized regional services, tends to be more effective in remote rural municipalities closer to urban centers, as long as it is articulated with the health transportation policy. The use of information technology and expansion of the scope of telehealth activities is mandatory to face distances in such scenarios. Comprehensive primary health care with a strong cultural component is key to guaranteeing the right to health for citizens residing in such regions.

References

Brundisini F, Giacomini M, DeJean D, Vanstone M, Winsor S, Smith A. Chronic disease patients' experiences with accessing health care in rural and remote areas: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2013;13(15):1-33.

Scheil-Adlung X, editor. Global evidence on inequities in rural health protection: new data on rural deficits in health coverage for 174 countries. Geneva (CH): International Labour Office, Social Protection Department; 2015 [cited 2020 May 26]. (ESS document; nº 47). Available from: https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/RessourcePDF.pdf

Lehmann U, Dieleman M, Martineau T. Staffing remote rural areas in middle- and low-income countries: a literature review of attraction and retention. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-19

Travassos C, Viacava F. Acesso e uso de serviços de saúde em idosos residentes em áreas rurais, Brasil, 1998 e 2003. Cad Saude Publica. 2007;23(10):2490-502.https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2007001000023

Pessoa VM, Almeida MM, Carneiro FF. Como garantir o direito à saúde para as populações do campo, da floresta e das águas no Brasil? Saude Debate. 2018;42 Espec Nº 1:302-14. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-11042018s120

Santos M, Silveira ML. O Brasil: território e sociedade no início do século XXI. Rio de Janeiro: Record; 2001.

Hart JT. The inverse care law. Lancet. 1971;297(7696):405-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(71)92410-x

Arruda NM, Maia AG, ALVES LC. Desigualdade no acesso à saúde entre as áreas urbanas e rurais do Brasil: uma decomposição de fatores entre 1998 a 2008. Cad Saude Publica. 2018;34(6):e00213816. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00213816

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, Coordenação de Geografia. Classificação e caracterização dos espaços rurais e urbanos do Brasil: uma primeira aproximação. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2017.

Ministério da Saúde (BR). Portaria Nº 2.979, de 12 de novembro de 2019. Institui o Programa Previne Brasil, que estabelece novo modelo de financiamento de custeio da Atenção Primária à Saúde no âmbito do Sistema Único de Saúde, por meio da alteração da Portaria de Consolidação nº 6/GM/MS, de 28 de setembro de 2017. Diário Oficial da União. 13 nov 2019 [cited 2020 May 26];Seção 1:97. Available from: https://www.in.gov.br/en/web/dou/-/portaria-n-2.979-de-12-de-novembro-de-2019-227652180

Santos M. A natureza do espaço: técnica e tempo, razão e emoção. São Paulo: Hucitec; 1996.

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, Coordenação de Geografia. Cidades. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; c2017 [cited 2020 May 26]. Available from: https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/

OCDE, Directorate for Public Governance and Territorial Development. OECD regional typology. Paris (FR); 2011 [cited 2020 May 26]. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy/OECD_regional_typology_Nov2012.pdf

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, Coordenação de Geografia. Regiões de influência das cidades: 2018. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2020.

Miranda EE, Magalhães LA, Carvalho CA. Proposta de Delimitação Territorial do MATOPIBA. Campinas, SP: Embrapa, GITE; 2014 [cited 2020 May 26]. (Nota Técnica; nº 1]. Available from: https://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/infoteca/bitstream/doc/1037313/1/NT1DelimitacaoMatopiba.pdf

Sena A, Freitas CM, Barcellos C, Ramalho W, Corvalan C. Medindo o invisível: análise dos Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável em populações expostas à seca. Cienc Saude Coletiva. 2016;21(3):671-84. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232015213.21642015

Adams C, Murrieta R, Neves W, organizadores. Sociedades caboclas amazônicas; modernidade e invisibilidade. São Paulo: Annablume; 2006.

Thery H. Situações da Amazônia no Brasil e no continente. Estud Av. 2005;19(53):37-49. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142005000100003

Borma LS, Nobre CA, editores. Seca na Amazônia: causas e consequências. São Paulo: Oficina de Textos; 2013.

Bourke L, Humphreys JS, Wakerman J, Taylor J. Understanding rural and remote health: a framework for analysis in Australia. Health Place. 2012;18(3):496-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.02.009

Strasser R. Rural health around the world: challenges and solutions. Family Pract. 2003;20(4):457-63. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmg422

WONCA Working Party on Rural Practice. Política de qualidade e eficácia dos cuidados de saúde rural. Rev Bras Med Fam Comunidade. 2013;8 Supl 1:15-24. https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc8(1)728

Almeida PF, Giovanella L, Martins Filho MT, Lima LD. Redes regionalizadas e garantia de atenção especializada em saúde: a experiência do Ceará, Brasil. Cienc Saude Coletiva. 2019;24(12):4527-39. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320182412.25562019

Wolfe MK, McDonald NC, Holmes GM. Transportation barriers to health care in the United States: findings from the National Health Interview Survey, 1997-2017. Am J Public Health. 2020;110(6):815-22. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305579

Barbosa HHMM, Santos ALM, Cruz RAP, Borges RGL, Rodrigues Neto TS. Perfil dos pacientes atendidos pelo programa Tratamento Fora de Domicílio no Município de Belém, Estado do Pará, Brasil. Rev Pan Amaz Saude.2010;1(3):43-7.https://doi.org/10.5123/S2176-62232010000300006

Murphy P, Burge F, Wong ST. Measurement and rural primary health care: a scoping review. Rural Remote Health. 2019;19(3):4911. https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH4911

Giovanella L, Mendonça MHM, Fausto MCR, Almeida PF, Bousquat A, Lima JG, et al. A provisão emergencial de médicos pelo Programa Mais Médicos e a qualidade da estrutura das unidades básicas de saúde. Cienc Saude Coletiva. 2016;21(9):2697-708. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232015219.16052016

Moffatt JJ, Eley DS. The reported benefits of telehealth for rural Australians. Aust Health Rev. 2010;34(3):276-81. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH09794

Hitt WC, Low G, Bird TM, Ott R. Telemedical cervical cancer screening to bridge medicaid service care gap for rural women. Telemed E Health. 2013;19(5):403-8. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2012.0148.

Published

2022-08-08

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Bousquat, A. ., Fausto, M. C. R. ., Almeida, P. F. de, Lima, J. G., Seidl, H. ., Sousa, A. B. L., & Giovanella, L. (2022). Different remote realities: health and the use of territory in Brazilian rural municipalities. Revista De Saúde Pública, 56, 73. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2022056003914

Funding data