Papanicolaou test in Brazil: analysis of the National Health Survey of 2013 and 2019

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057004798

Keywords:

Cervix Uteri, Neoplasms, Health Services Accessibility, Mass Screening

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the coverage of cervical cancer screening in Brazil in 2013 and 2019, investigating the factors associated with having the test performed and the reasons given for not doing it. Additionally, a comparison is made concerning the time taken to receive the test result in SUS (Sistema Único de Saúde) and in the private health services. METHODS: Using data from the National Health Survey (Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde - PNS), prevalence rates and corresponding confidence intervals were calculated to determine the frequency of recent cervical cancer screenings among women aged between 25 and 64 years old in Brazil, for both 2013 and 2019. Poisson regression models were employed to compare the prevalence of the outcome according to sociodemographic characteristics. The reasons for not having the test and the time between performing and receiving the result were also analyzed. RESULTS: The findings revealed an increase in the coverage of preventive cervical cancer exams in Brazil from 78.7% in 2013 to 81.3% in 2019. Additionally, there was a decline in the proportion of women who had never undergone the exam, from 9.7% to 6.1%. Prevalence of test uptake was higher among white women, those with higher levels of education and income, and those residing in the South and Southeast regions of the country. The most commonly cited reasons for not taking the test were the impression it was unnecessary (45% in both 2013 and 2019) and never having been asked to undergo the test (20.6% in 2013 and 14.8% in 2019). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the high coverage of screening achieved in the country, there is great inequality in access to the test, and a non-negligible number of women are at greater risk of dying from a preventable disease. Efforts must be made to structure an organized screening program that identifies and captures the most vulnerable women.

References

Bosch FX, Lorincz A, Muñoz N, Meijer CJLM, Shah KV. The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. J Clin Pathol. 2002 Apr;55(4):244-65. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.55.4.244

World Health Organization. Global strategy to accelerate the elimination of cervical cancer as a public health problem. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020 [citado 18 fev 2022]. Disponível em: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240014107

Vaccarella S, Lortet-Tieulent J, Plummer M, Franceschi S, Bray F. Worldwide trends in cervical cancer incidence: impact of screening against changes in disease risk factors. Eur J Cancer. 2013 Oct;49(15):3262-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2013.04.024

Ministério da Saúde (BR). Diretrizes brasileiras para o rastreamento do câncer do colo do útero. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Nacional de Cancêr José Alencar Gomes da Silva; 2016, [citado 9 abr 2022]. Disponível em: https://www.inca.gov.br/sites/ufu.sti.inca.local/files/media/document/diretrizesparaorastreamentodocancerdocolodoutero_2016_corrigido.pdf

Theme Filha MM, Leal MD, Oliveira EF, Esteves-Pereira AP, Gama SG. Regional and social inequalities in the performance of Pap test and screening mammography and their correlation with lifestyle: Brazilian National Health Survey, 2013. Int J Equity Health. 2016 Nov;15(1):136. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0430-9

Oliveira MM, Andrade SS, Oliveira PP, Silva GA, Silva MM, Malta DC. Pap-test coverage in women aged 25 to 64 years old, according to the National Health Survey and the Surveillance System for Risk and Protective Factors for Chronic Diseases by Telephone Survey, 2013. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2018 Aug;21:e180014. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-549720180014

Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492

Vaccarella S, Franceschi S, Engholm G, Lönnberg S, Khan S, Bray F. 50 years of screening in the Nordic countries: quantifying the effects on cervical cancer incidence. Br J Cancer. 2014 Aug;111(5):965-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.362

Girianelli VR, Gamarra CJ, Azevedo e Silva G. Disparities in cervical and breast cancer mortality in Brazil. Rev Saude Publica. 2014 Jun;48(3):459-67. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048005214

Barbosa IR, Souza DL, Bernal MM, Costa IC. [Regional inequalities in cervical cancer mortality in Brazil: trends and projections through to 2030]. Cien Saude Colet. 2016 Jan;21(1):253-62. Portuguese. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232015211.03662015

Silva GA, Jardim BC, Ferreira VM, Junger WL, Girianelli VR. Cancer mortality in the Capitals and in the interior of Brazil: a four-decade analysis. Rev Saude Publica. 2020;54:126. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054002255

Quinn M, Babb P, Jones J, Allen E. Effect of screening on incidence of and mortality from cancer of cervix in England: evaluation based on routinely collected statistics. BMJ. 1999 Apr;318(7188):904-8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7188.904

Claro IB, Lima LD, Almeida PF. Cervical cancer guidelines, prevention and screening strategies: experiences from Brazil and Chile. Cien Saude Colet. 2021 Oct;26(10):4497-509. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320212610.11352021

Devarapalli P, Labani S, Nagarjuna N, Panchal P, Asthana S. Barriers affecting uptake of cervical cancer screening in low and middle income countries: a systematic review. Indian J Cancer. 2018;55(4):318-26. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijc.IJC_253_18

Stuart G, D’Lima D. Perceived barriers and facilitators to attendance for cervical cancer screening in EU member states: a systematic review and synthesis using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Psychol Health. 2021;13:1-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2021.1918690

Rollet Q, Tron L, De Mil R, Launoy G, Guillaume E. Contextual factors associated with cancer screening uptake: A systematic review of observational studies. Prev Med. 2021 Sep;150:106692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106692

Dias MB, Tomazelli JG, Assis M. Cervix cancer screening in Brazil: analysis of Siscolo data from 2002 to 2006. Epidemiol. Serv. Saúde. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2010;19(3):293-306. https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742010000300011

Martínez-Mesa J, Werutsky G, Campani RB, Wehrmeister FC, Barrios CH. Inequalities in Pap smear screening for cervical cancer in Brazil. Prev Med. 2013 Oct;57(4):366-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.06.026

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Diretoria de Pesquisas. Coordenação de Trabalho e Rendimento. Sistema Integrado de Pesquisas Domiciliares – SIPD. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2007 [citado 20 abr 2022]. Disponível em: http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/indicadores/sipd/texto_discussao_24.pdf

Souza-Júnior PR, Freitas MP, Antonaci GD, Szwarcwald CL. Sampling design for the National Health Survey, 2013. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2015;24(2):207-16. https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742015000200003

Stopa SR, Szwarcwald CL, Oliveira MM, Gouvea EC, Vieira ML, Freitas MP, et al. National Health Survey 2019: history, methods and perspectives. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2020 Oct;29(5):e2020315. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1679-49742020000500004

StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station (TX): StataCorp LP; 2015.

Jolidon V, De Prez V, Willems B, Bracke P, Cullati S, Burton-Jeangros C. Never and under cervical cancer screening in Switzerland and Belgium: trends and inequalities. BMC Public Health. 2020 Oct;20(1):1517. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09619-z

Chen HY, Kessler CL, Mori N, Chauhan SP. Cervical cancer screening in the United States, 1993-2010: characteristics of women who are never screened. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2012 Nov;21(11):1132-8. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2011.3418

Madalena Ribeiro C, Silva IS, Eluf Neto J, Cury LCPB, Silva GA. Follow-up of women screened for cervical cancer in São Paulo, Brazil: an analysis of the times to diagnostic investigation and treatment. Cancer Epidemiol. 2021 Jun;72:101940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2021.101940

Ministério da Saúde (BR). Manual de gestão da qualidade dos laboratórios de Citopatologia. 2. ed. rev. ampl. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Nacional de Cancêr José Alencar Gomes da Silva; 2016 [citado 9 abr 2022]. Disponível em: https://www.inca.gov.br/sites/ufu.sti.inca.local/files//media/document//livro_completo_manual_citopatologia-2016.pdf

Farias AC, Barbieri AR. Seguimento do câncer de colo de útero: estudo da continuidade da assistência à paciente em uma região de saúde. Esc Anna Nery. 2016;20(4):e20160096. https://doi.org/10.5935/1414-8145.20160096

Teixeira JC, Vale DB, Campos CS, Bragança JF, Discacciati MG, Zeferino LC. Organization of cervical cancer screening with DNA-HPV testing impact on early-stage cancer detection: a population-based demonstration study in a Brazilian city. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2021 Oct;5:100084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2021.100084

Poljak M, Seme K, Maver PJ, Kocjan BJ, Cuschieri KS, Rogovskaya SI, et al. Human papillomavirus prevalence and type-distribution, cervical cancer screening practices and current status of vaccination implementation in Central and Eastern Europe. Vaccine. 2013 Dec;31 Suppl 7:H59-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.03.029

Walsh B, Silles M, O’Neill C. The importance of socio-economic variables in cancer screening participation: a comparison between population-based and opportunistic screening in the EU-15. Health Policy. 2011 Aug;101(3):269-76.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.02.001

Benard VB, Royalty J, Saraiya M, Rockwell T, Helsel W. The effectiveness of targeting never or rarely screened women in a national cervical cancer screening program for underserved women. Cancer Causes Control. 2015 May;26(5):713-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-015-0542-3

Szwarcwald CL, Malta DC, Pereira CA, Vieira ML, Conde WL, Souza Júnior PR, et al. Pesquisa nacional de saúde no Brasil: concepção e metodologia de aplicação. Cien Saude Coletiva 2014; 19(2): 333-42.

https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232014192.14072012

Lotufo PA, Santos RD, Sposito AC, Bertolami M. RochaFaria Neto J, Izar MC, et al. Prevalência de diagnóstico médico de colesterol alto autorreferido na população brasileira: análise da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde, 2013. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2019; 108(5): 411-416. https://doi.org/10.1590/SS2237-9622202200002.especial

Published

2023-09-14

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Azevedo e Silva, G., Damacena, G. N., Ribeiro, C. M., Alcantara, L. L. de M., Souza Júnior, P. R. B. de, & Szwarcwald, C. L. (2023). Papanicolaou test in Brazil: analysis of the National Health Survey of 2013 and 2019. Revista De Saúde Pública, 57(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057004798

Funding data