Contributions from anthropology to medicine: a bibliographic review in Brazil

Authors

  • Marcos de Souza Queiroz Universidade Estadual de Campinas; Núcleo de Estudos de Políticas Públicas; Núcleo Interdisciplinar de Estudos em Saúde
  • Ana Maria Canesqui Universidade Estadual de Campinas; Núcleo de Estudos de Políticas Públicas; Núcleo Interdisciplinar de Estudos de Políticas Públicas; Departamento de Medicina Preventiva e Social

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89101986000200005

Keywords:

Anthropology, medical, Medicine, traditional, Brazil

Abstract

An analysis was made of the most representative literature both on health and illness representations and on practices of cure in Brazil from an anthropological point of view. Firsttly, there was in this litterature the concern of collecting the folk traditions from the rural world, expressing a great variety of viewpoints. In general, "popular medicine" was seen as a set of rude and imitative ideas and practices stemming from both the erudite medicine of the past and Brazilian ethnic traditions. Secondly, social sciences have had a great influence on this kind of study. After the 30's, particularly from the 40's to the 70's, a number of important studies, influenced by academic postures such as functionalism, acculturation theory and development theories took place in this field of study. During the 70's, this field reached maturity with a great amount of research carried out under diverse theoretical influences. However, the structuralist and functional-structuralist theories (which range from abstract formalism to substantivism) had a more consistent weight in that decade. Three important recent studies were also analysed and the main new theoretical trends in this field, particularly as regards Marxist theories, were also discussed.

Published

1986-04-01

Issue

Section

Current Comments

How to Cite

Queiroz, M. de S., & Canesqui, A. M. (1986). Contributions from anthropology to medicine: a bibliographic review in Brazil . Revista De Saúde Pública, 20(2), 141-151. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89101986000200005