Soil type spatial prediction from Random Forest

different training datasets, transferability, accuracy and uncertainty assessment

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-992x-2017-0300

Keywords:

digital soil mapping, soil survey, legacy data

Abstract

Different uses of soil legacy data such as training dataset as well as the selection of soil environmental covariables could drive the accuracy of machine learning techniques. Thus, this study evaluated the ability of the Random Forest algorithm to predict soil classes from different training datasets and extrapolate such information to a similar area. The following training datasets were extracted from legacy data: a) point data composed of 53 soil samples; b) 30 m buffer around the soil samples, and soil map polygons excluding: c) 20 m; and d) 30 m from the boundaries of polygons. These four datasets were submitted to principal component analysis (PCA) to reduce multidimensionality. Each dataset derived a new one. Different combinations of predictor variables were tested. A total of 52 models were evaluated by means of error of models, prediction uncertainty and external validation for overall accuracy and Kappa index. The best result was obtained by reducing the number of predictors with the PCA along with information from the buffer around the points. Although Random Forest has been considered a robust spatial predictor model, it was clear it is sensitive to different strategies of selecting training dataset. Effort was necessary to find the best training dataset for achieving a suitable level of accuracy of spatial prediction. To identify a specific dataset seems to be better than using a great number of variables or a large volume of training data. The efforts made allowed for the accurate acquisition of a mapped area 15.5 times larger than the reference area.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2019-04-16

How to Cite

Machado, D. F. T., Silva, S. H. G., Curi, N., & Menezes, M. D. de. (2019). Soil type spatial prediction from Random Forest: different training datasets, transferability, accuracy and uncertainty assessment. Scientia Agricola, 76(3), 243-254. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-992x-2017-0300

Issue

Section

Soils and Plant Nutrition