Planosol soil sample size for computerized tomography measurement of physical parameters

Authors

  • Alceu Pedrotti Universidade Federal de Sergipe; Departamento Engenharia Agronômica
  • Eloy Antonio Pauletto Universidade Federal de Pelotas; Departamento de Solos
  • Silvio Crestana Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária; Instrumentação Agropecuária
  • Paulo Estevão Cruvinel Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária; Instrumentação Agropecuária
  • Carlos Manoel Pedro Vaz Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária; Instrumentação Agropecuária
  • João de Mendonça Naime Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária; Instrumentação Agropecuária
  • Alvaro Macedo da Silva Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária; Instrumentação Agropecuária

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162003000400019

Keywords:

lowland, albaqualf, bulk density, compaction, soil moisture

Abstract

Computerized tomography (CT) is an important tool in Soil Science for noninvasive measurement of density and water content of soil samples. This work aims to describe the aspects of sample size adequacy for Planosol (Albaqualf) and to evaluate procedures for statistical analysis, using a CT scanner with a 241Am source. Density errors attributed to the equipment are 0.051 and 0.046 Mg m-3 for horizons A and B, respectively. The theoretical value for sample thickness for the Planosol, using this equipment, is 4.0 cm for the horizons A and B. The ideal thickness of samples is approximately 6.0 cm, being smaller for samples of the horizon B in relation to A. Alternatives for the improvement of the efficiency analysis and the reliability of the results obtained by CT are also discussed, and indicate good precision and adaptability of the application of this technology in Planosol (Albaqualf) studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2003-12-01

Issue

Section

Soils and Plant Nutrition

How to Cite

Planosol soil sample size for computerized tomography measurement of physical parameters . (2003). Scientia Agricola, 60(4), 735-740. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162003000400019