Plant response to mechanical resistance and air-filled porosity of soils under conventional and no-tillage system
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162004000400016Keywords:
plant growth, plant height, soil physical properties, tillage systemAbstract
Roots may respond to restrictive soil physical conditions and send signals to shoots to control plant growth. Soil mechanical resistance and aeration can be managed to improve the soil physical conditions for plant growth by using different tillage systems. The objective of this study was to quantify the influence of no-tillage and conventional-tillage systems on plant response to soil mechanical resistance and aeration. The study was carried out on a farm, cultivated with corn, with a side-by-side comparison of no-tillage and conventional-tillage systems. Thirty-two paired sampling sites were located along two transects, located one in each treatment. Soil water content, bulk density, and plant growth were measured in each treatment. Based on the soil water and bulk density measurements, the air-filled porosity values were computed for each treatment. Soil water contents and bulk density values were converted to soil mechanical resistance by using the soil resistance curve. Plant growth varied positively with soil air-filled porosity, and negatively with soil mechanical resistance in both tillage systems. However, the decrease rates/increase rates were dependent on the tillage system. The no-tillage system somehow improved the soil physical conditions for the plants, especially when they were more restrictive, allowing them to attain greater values of growth.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2004-01-01
Issue
Section
Soils and Plant Nutrition
License
All content of the journal, except where identified, is licensed under a Creative Common attribution-type BY-NC.How to Cite
Plant response to mechanical resistance and air-filled porosity of soils under conventional and no-tillage system . (2004). Scientia Agricola, 61(4), 451-456. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162004000400016