Genetic variability for girth growth and rubber yield in Hevea brasiliensis

Authors

  • Paulo de Souza Gonçalves Apta; IAC; Programa Seringueira
  • Marcelo de Almeida Silva Apta; DDD; Pólo Regional Centro Oeste
  • Ligia Regina Lima Gouvêa Apta; IAC; Programa Seringueira
  • Erivaldo José Scaloppi Junior Apta; DDD; Pólo Regional Noroeste Paulista

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162006000300006

Keywords:

rubber tree, heritability, genetic correlations, genotype-environment interaction

Abstract

Basic knowledge of genetic characteristics of populations is necessary to conduct effective breeding and selection. The objective of this paper is describing the genetic variation of rubber yield and the correlation with other traits, and estimating the genetic parameters for girth growth and total number of latex vessels. Sixty seven clones of Hevea brasiliensis (Willd. ex Adr. de Juss.) Muell.-Arg. were tested at five sites during 10 years. Characters girth growth at panel opening and rubber yield, showed broad sense heritability on plot mean level, from 0.32 to 0.66 and 0.59 to 0.92, respectively. Predicted genetic gains equal to 0.73 cm and 0.79 g increase respectively on girth and yield in the opening panel and mature phases seems realistic, even with moderate selection intensities. Genetic correlations with rubber yield, bark thickness and total number of latex vessels were very large, and almost no genotype-environment interaction was present for girth growth. High genotype-environment interaction was present for rubber yield with genetic and phenotypic correlations across the sites, ranging from 0.64 to 0.92 (genetic) and 0.63 to 0.89 (phenotypic). Total number of latex vessels rings had a high heritability, ranging from 20.0% to 64.0% in the sites E and B, respectively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2006-06-01

Issue

Section

Genetics and Plant Breeding

How to Cite

Genetic variability for girth growth and rubber yield in Hevea brasiliensis . (2006). Scientia Agricola, 63(3), 246-254. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162006000300006