Paradox in drug policies: discursive clashes on news portals over Law 13.840/2019

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902021210064

Keywords:

Public policy, Drug and narcotic control, Mass media

Abstract

This study is based on the premise that drug policies are discursively constructed by the engagement of different social actors and their capacity to forge consensus. Considering that people tend not to seek information on policies by themselves, the journalistic discourse plays an important role in mediating the contact between readers and the reality of drug policies. Thus, this work aims to analyze the discourses around the Act 13.840 of 2019, published at mass media portals online. This is a documental study based on the three-dimensional model for critical discourse analysis developed by Fairclough. The portals G1, R7, Carta Capital, and The Intercept Brasil (chosen due to granting free access and having different ideological perspectives) were searched for articles approaching the Act. Our results indicate that the published articles demonstrate knowledge on policy making and reinforce the hegemonic prohibitionist discourse, despite some unclear objections about possible alternatives. The representations of the Act 13.840 differed according to the publishing portal, but, in general, the articles made few considerations about the impact of the Act on the Psychosocial Support Network.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2021-09-29

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Paradox in drug policies: discursive clashes on news portals over Law 13.840/2019. (2021). Saúde E Sociedade, 30(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902021210064