Deslocamentos transnacionais da soberania popular: Império e multidão como distinção pós-democrática?

Autores

  • Pablo Holmes Universidade de Brasília. Instituto de Ciência Política

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-207020150113

Resumo

No presente artigo, realizo uma reconstrução sociológica da semântica da soberania popular, relacionando-a, com base em uma abordagem de teoria dos sistemas, aos processos de diferenciação estrutural do sistema político moderno. Ao se apreciarem os processos de transnacionalização e a descrição proposta por Hardt e Negri, levanta-se a questão acerca de quais estruturas seriam descritas pelo par de conceitos império e multidão, e em que grau esses conceitos têm plausibilidade sociológica, seja como descrição adequada da política mundial pós-nacional, seja como suposto "manifesto democrático para o século XXI".

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Referências

Adorno, Theodor & Horkheimer, Max. (2000), Dialektik der Aufklärung. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.

Amstutz, Marc & Karavas, Vaio. (2009), “Weltrecht: Ein Derridarisches Monster”. In: Calliess, Gralf-Peter et al. (orgs). Soziologische Jurisprudenz, Festschrift für Gunther Teubner zum 65. Geburtstag. Berlim, De Gruyter.

Anker, Elisabeth. (2012), “Left melodrama”. Contemporary Political Theory, 11 (2):130-152.

Beck, Ulrich. (2009), Macht und Gegenmacht im globalen Zeitalter. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.

Benjamin, Walter. (1972), “Linke Melancholie: Zu Erich Kästners neuem Gedichtbuch”. In: Gesammelte Schriften iii. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.

Brunkhorst, Hauke. (2000), “The enlightenment of rationality: remarks on Horkheimer’s and Adorno’s Dialectics of Enlightenment”. Constellations, 7 (1):133-140.

Brunkhorst, Hauke. (2002), Solidarität. Von der Bürgerfreundschaft zur globalen Rechtsgenossenschaft. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.

______. (2009), “Machbarkeitsillusionen, feierliche Erklärungen und Gesänge: Zum Verhältnis von Evolution und Revolution im Recht”. In: Calliess, Gralf-Peter et al. (orgs). Soziologische Jurisprudenz, Festschrift für Gunther Teubner zum 65. Geburtstag. Berlim, De Gruyter.

______. (2012), Legitimationskrisen: Verfassungsprobleme der Weltgesellschaft. Baden-Baden, Nomos.

Carrol, William & Fenema, Meindert. (2002), “Is there a transnational business community?”. International Sociology, 17 (3): 393-419.

Crouch, Colin. (2004), Post-democracy. Cambridge, Polity.

______. (2011), The strange non-death of neoliberalism. Cambridge, Polity.

Djelic, Marie Laure. (2006), “Marketization: from intellectual agenda to global policy-making”. In: Djelic, Marie Laure & Sahlin-Anderson, Kerstin (orgs.). Transnational governance: institutional dynamics of regulation. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Djelic, Marie Laure & Sahlin-Anderson, Kerstin. (2006), “Introduction – A world of governance: the rise of transnational regulation”. In: Djelic, Marie Laure & Sahlin-Anderson, Kerstin (orgs.). Transnational governance: institutional dynamics of regulation. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Drori, Gili & Meyer, John W. (2006), “Scientization: making a world safe for organizing”. In: Djelic, Marie Laure & Sahlin-Anderson, Kerstin (orgs.). Transnational governance: institutional dynamics of regulation. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Fitzpatrick, Peter. (2002), “Laws of empire”. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 15: 253-271.

Goodale, Mark. (2005), “Empires of law: discipline and resistance within the transnational system”. Social & Legal Studies, 14 (4): 553-583.

Grimm, Dieter. (2001), “Die Bedingungen demokratischer Rechtssetzung”. In: Grimm, Dieter & Wingert, Lutz (orgs.). Die Öffentlichkeit der Vernunft und die Vernunft der Öffentlichkeit. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.

Hall, Rodney B. & Biersteker, Thomas J. (2004), “The emergence of private authority in the international system”. In: ______ (orgs.). The emergence of private authority in global governance. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Hardt, Michael & Negri, Antonio. (2001), Empire. Cambridge, ma, Harvard University Press.

______. (2004), Multitude: war and and democracy in the age of empire. Nova York, Penguin.

Holmes, Pablo. (2013), Verfassungsevolution in der Weltgesellschaft: Differenzierungsprobleme des Rechts und der Politik im Zeitalter der Global Governance. Baden-Baden, Nomos.

Honneth, Axel. (1989), Kritik der Macht: Reflexionstufen einer kritischen Gesellschaftstheorie. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.

Jessop, Bob. (1995),“The regulation approach, governance, and post-Fordism: alternative perspectives on economic and political change?”. Economy and Society, 24 (3): 307-333.

Kalyvas, Andreas. (2003), “Feet or clay? Reflections on Hardt’s and Negri’s Empire”. Constellations, 10 (2): 264-279.

Kantorowics, Ernst. (1997), “The king’s two bodies: a study in medieval political teology”. Princeton, nj, Princeton University Press.

Kastner, Fatima. (2007), “Luhmanns Souveränitätsparadox: Zum generativen Mechanismus des politischen Systems der Weltgesellschaft”. In: Neves, Marcelo & Voigt, Rüdiger (orgs.). Die Staaten der Weltgesellschaft. Niklas Luhmanns Staatsverständnis. Baden-Baden, Nomos.

Keohane, Robert O. (2002), “Governance in a partially globalized world”. Power and governance in a partially globalized world. Nova York, Palvrage.

Koskenniemi, Martti. (2007), “The fate of international public law: between technicque and politics”. The Modern Law Review, 70 (1): 1-30.

Lefort, Claude. (1988), “The Question of Democracy”. In: ______. Democracy and political theory. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Lindahl, Hans. (2010), “A-legality: postnationalism and the question of legal boundaries”. The Modern Law Review, 73 (1): 30-56.

Luhmann, Niklas. (1980), “Gesellschaftsstruktur und semantische Tradition”. Gesells chaftsstruktur und Semantik 1: Studien zur Wissenssoziologie der modernen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.

______. (1981). Politische Theorie im Wohlfahrtsstaat. Munique/Viena, Gunther Olzog.

______. (1989), “Individuum, Individualität, Individualismus”. Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik: Studien zur Wissenssoziologie der modernen Gesellschaft, Bd. 3. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.

______. (1990), “Verfassung als evolutionäre Errungenschaft”. Rechtshistorisches Journal, 9: 176-220.

______. (1993), Das Recht der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.

______. (2000), Die Politik der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.

______. (2004), “Sinn, Selbstreferenz und soziokulturelle Evolution”. In: Burkart, G. & Runkel, G. (orgs.). Luhmann und die Kulturtheorie. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.

Mieville, China. (2004), “The commodity-form theory of international law: an introduction“. Leiden Journal of International Law, 17: 271-302.

Negri, Antonio. (1999), Insurgencies, constituent power and the modern State. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.

Neves, Marcelo. (1998), Symbolische Konstitutionalisierung. Berlim, Dunker & Humblot.

______. (2006), Entre Têmis e Leviatã. São Paulo, Martins Fontes.

Noelke, Andreas. (2011), “Transnational economic order and national economic institutions: comparative capitalism meets international political economy”. Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung (mpifg) Working Paper. Disponível em mpi-fg-koeln.mpg.de, consultado em 18/4/2013.

Pashukanis, Evgeny. (2002), The general theory of law and marxism. New Brunswick, nj, Transaction Publishers.

Picciotto, Sol. (1997), “Networks in international economic integration: fragmented States and the dilemmas of neoliberalism”. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 17 (2-3): 1014-1056.

Ruggie, John G. (1998), “Globalization and the embedded liberalism compromise: the end of an era?” In: Streek, Wolfgang (org.). Internationale Wirtschaft, nationale Demokratie: Herausforderungen für die Demokratietheorie. Frankfurt, Campus.

Sand, Inger-Johanne. (2009), “Hybrid law: law in a global society of differentiation and change”. In: Calliess, Gralf-Peter et al. (orgs). Soziologische Jurisprudenz, Festschrift für Gunther Teubner zum 65. Geburtstag. Berlim, De Gruyter.

Scharpf, Fritz. (1997), “Globalisierung als Beschränkung der Handlungsmöglichkeiten nationalstaatlicher Politik”. Max Planck Discussion Paper 97/1. Disponível em mpi-fg-koeln.mpg.de, consultado em 18/4/2013.

Schuh, Franz. (2004), “Walter Benjamins Grausamkeit”. Disponível em http://www.

zeit.de/2004/39/WalterBenjaminsGrausamkeit, consultado em 21/10/2014.

Stäheli, Urs. (2000), Sinnzusammenbrüche, Eine dekonstruktive Lektüre der Systemtheorie Luhmanns. Weilerswist, Velbrück.

Stichweh, Rudolf. (2000a), “Systems theory as an alternative to action theory? The rise of communication as a theoretical option”. Acta Sociologica, 43 (5): 5-13.

______. (2000b), “Semantik und Sozialstruktur, Zur Logik einer systemtheoretischer Unterscheidung”. Soziale Systeme, 6 (2): 237-250.

Teubner, Gunther. (1987), “Juridification: concepts, aspects, limits, solutions”. In: ______ (org.). Juridification of social spheres: a comparative analysis in the areas of labor, corporate, antitrust and social welfare law. Berlim, De Gruyter.

______. (1996), “Globale Bukowina. Zur Emergenz eines transnationalen Rechtspluralismus”. Disponível em www.uni-frankfurt.de/fb/fb01/l_Personal /em_profs/teubner/dokumente/Bukowina_english.pdf, consultado em 6/12/2012.

Vesting, Thomas. (2009), “Politische Verfassung? Der moderne (liberale) Verfassungsbegriff und seine systemtheoretische Rekonstruktion”. In: Calliess, Gralf-Peter et al. (orgs). Soziologische Jurisprudenz, Festschrift für Gunther Teubner zum 65.

Geburtstag. Berlim, De Gruyter.

Schmitt, Carl. (2004), Politische Theologie. Vier Kapitel zur Lehre von der Souveränität. Berlim, Duncker & Humblot.

Tilly, Charles. (2004), Contention and democracy in Europe, 1650-2000. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Walker, Neil. (2008), “Taking constitutionalism beyond the State”. Political Studies, 56: 519-543.

Wiener, Jarrod. (1995), “The transnational political economy: a framework for analysis”. Kent Papers in Politics and International Relations, 4 (11).

Willke, Helmut. (2001), Atopia: Studien zur atopischen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.

______. (2003), Heterotopia: Studien zur Krisis der Ordnung moderner Gesellschaften. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.

Downloads

Publicado

2015-06-01

Edição

Seção

Artigos

Como Citar

Holmes, P. (2015). Deslocamentos transnacionais da soberania popular: Império e multidão como distinção pós-democrática?. Tempo Social, 27(1), 239-260. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-207020150113