A systems approach to the sociology of law: Luhmann and Teubner

Authors

  • Marcelo Pereira de Mello Universidade Federal Fluminense

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-20702006000100018

Keywords:

Law, Sociological theory, Systems analysis, Subjectivism, Historicism, Autopoiesis

Abstract

This article proposes a critical analysis of the contributions of Niklas Luhmann and Gunther Teubner to the development of the Systems Theory of Law (STL). Its main hypothesis is that the authors in question converge towards a shared critique of the basic theses of classical sociological theories, which assert that law is an epiphenomenon of the social relations of a variety of agents and their distinct interests: individuals, classes, corporations, parties, and so on. In contrast, Systems Theory claims that law can be analyzed as a social subsystem which, based on the operation of its own code, imprints a meaning and content to the communications of the action's agents. This not only means that law is created by social relations between agents, but that law also creates realities that guide the actions of agents.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BOUCOCK, Cary. (2000), In the grip of freedom : law and Modernity in Max Weber. Toronto, University of Toronto Press.

CLASTRES, Pierre. (1988), A sociedade contra o Estado. Rio de Janeiro, Francisco Alves.

COTTERRELL, Roger. (2001), “Is there a logic of Legal Transplants?”. In: NELKEN, D. & FEEST, Johannes (eds.). Adapting legal cultures. Oxford/Portland, Oregon, Hart Publishing.

FREUND, Julien. (1987), Sociologia de Max Weber. Rio de Janeiro, Forense Universitária.

FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M. (1986), “Legal Culture and the Welfare State”. In: TEUBNER, Gunther (ed.). Dilemmas of law in the Welfare State. Berlim/Nova York, Walter de Gruyter.

HABERMAS, Jurgen. (1997), Direito e democracia. Rio de Janeiro, Tempo Brasileiro, v. I e II.

HUSSERL, Edmund. (1986), Ideas relativas a una fenomenología pura y una filosofía fenomenológica. México, Fondo de Cultura Económica.

LEMPERT, Richard. (1988), “The Autonomy of Law: Two Visions Compared”. In: TEUBNER, Gunther (ed.). Autopoietic law: a new approach to law and society. Berlim/Nova York, Walter de Gruyter.

LUHMANN, Niklas. (1983), Sociologia do direito. Rio de Janeiro, Edições Tempo Brasileiro, v. I e II.

LUHMANN, Niklas. (1986), “The self-reproduction of law and its limits”. In: TEUBNER, Gunther (ed.). Dilemmas of law in the Welfare State. Berlim/Nova York, Walter de Gruyter.

LUHMANN, Niklas. (1988), “The unity of legal sistem”. In: TEUBNER, Gunther (ed.). Autopoietic law: a new approach to law and society. Berlim/Nova York, Walter de Gruyter.

LUHMANN, Niklas. (1995), Social systems. Stanford, California, Stanford University Press.

LUHMANN, Niklas. (2001), Teoría política en el Estado de bienestar. Madrid, Alianza Editorial.

MARTINS, Maurício V. (2001), “É o direito um sistema autopoiético? Discutindo uma objeção oriunda do marxismo”. In: MELLO, Marcelo P. (org.). Justiça e sociedade: temas e perspectivas. São Paulo, LTr.

MATURANA, Humberto. (2001), Cognição, ciência e vida cotidiana. Belo Horizonte, Editora da UFMG.

MATURANA, Humberto & VARELA, Francisco J. (1980), Autopoiesis and cognition. Boston, Reidel.

MELLO, Marcelo P. (1995), “Welfare State: crise do sistema, crise do paradigma e perspectivas pós-industriais”. Archétypon, 4 (10), Rio de Janeiro.

MELLO, Marcelo P. (org.). (2001), Justiça e sociedade: temas e perspectivas. São Paulo, LTr.

NELKEN, David. (1988), “Changing paradigms in the sociology of law”. In: TEUBNER, Gunther (ed.). Autopoietic law: a new approach to law and society. Berlim/Nova York, Walter de Gruyter.

NELKEN, David & FEEST, Johannes (eds.). (2001), Adapting legal cultures. Oxford/Portland, Oregon, Hart Publishing.

NEVES, Marcelo da Costa Pinto. (1994), A constitucionalização simbólica. São Paulo, Editora Acadêmica.

NONET, Phillippe & SELZNICK, Philip. (2001 [1978]), Law and society in transition. New Brunswick, New Jersey, Transaction Publishers.

ROTH, Gerhard. (1987), Die Entwicklung kognitiver Selbstreferencialitat im menschlichen Gehirn. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.

SCHUTZ, Alfred & LUCKMAN, Thomas. (1977). Las estructuras del mundo de la vida. Buenos Aires, Amorrortu Editors.

TEUBNER, Gunther. (1986), Dilemmas of law in the Welfare State. Berlim/Nova York, Walter de Gruyter.

TEUBNER, Gunther. (ed.). (1988), Autopoietic law: a new approach to law and society. Berlim/Nova York, Walter de Gruyter.

TEUBNER, Gunther. (1989), O direito como sistema autopoiético. Lisboa, Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.

TEUBNER, Gunther. (1996), Droit et réflexivité : l’auto-référence en droit et dans l’organisation. Belgique, Bruyland.

Published

2006-06-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Mello, M. P. de. (2006). A systems approach to the sociology of law: Luhmann and Teubner . Tempo Social, 18(1), 351-373. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-20702006000100018